Knuke Huffman wrote:
Another key to whether or not the two atoms stay together has to do with the distance traveled for them to reunite. As the two atoms approach each other, they are accelerating due to Casimir forces. With each successive attempt to reunite, a portion of the impact
Summing up the MAHG parameters:
300 K fill pressure 80 Torr
Filament: 2.5E-4 meters dia x 0.1 meters long
~0.1 ohms @ 300 K ~1.13 ohms @ 2000 K
Filament Power Aprox. 127 watts @ 2000 K (12 Volts D.C.)
Filament Power Aprox 6.4 watts @ 5% duty cycle. Temp 2000 K?
Aprox. MAHG volume 500 cm^3
Summing up the MAHG parameters:
300 K fill pressure 80 Torr
Filament: 2.5E-4 meters dia x 0.1 meters long
~0.1 ohms @ 300 K ~1.13 ohms @ 2000 K
Filament Power Aprox. 127 watts @ 2000 K (12 Volts D.C.)
Filament Power Aprox 6.4 watts @ 5% duty cycle. Temp 2000 K?
Aprox. MAHG volume 500 cm^3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can somebody offer a reasonable explanation as to why atomic hydrogen when it
recombines doesn't blow itself apart in the act?
Since the molecule ends up in a lower energy state than the two separate
atoms were in, taken together, and since the whole package
Fred,
The main problem which is still lingering is the lack of direct
confirmation about the low power input, and the lack of a
schematic. This could relate to being 'holiday' season in Europe.
But when you look at the test reports, when JLN runs the device on
full DC power, he is able to
FYI,
http://www.theday.com/eng/web/news/re.aspx?re=2582C7CF-6F58-468E-B7BD-D662698BAB9D
http://tinyurl.com/b7cm8
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
Ken Shoulder has some new papers out on his site, focusing on
fluidized electrons:
http://www.svn.net/krscfs/Electromagnetic%20Pulse%20Source%20Using%20Fluidized%20Electrons.pdf
Some observers might opine that the military overtones of this
research are alarming.
Not really. Realistically,
Jones,
But when you look at the test reports, when JLN runs the device on
full DC power, he is able to input 1324 watts, which seemingly
couldn't happen if this power was all going to a filament with a
resistance higher than an ohm.
1324 watts on continuous D.C. would require ~ 47
A phishing spam came through the Earthlink spamblocker and fell into my
junk bin. The return address is: bill (at sign) earthlink-billing.net I
usually dump these things without checking them, but this caught my eye.
The message begins:
Your Earthlink billing information is invalid or
All,
Perhaps comparing Naudin's tube with an EIMAC 3CW2A power
triode may be instructive. Frolov/Moller probably obtained the Russian
equivalent from St. Petersburg, where he lives, from Svetlana (also in
St. Pete's). See http://www.g8wrb.org/data/Svetlana/pdf/3CW2A7.pdf.
cheers -
As a 6 year Earthlink subscriber I've seen that one about
twice a year, Jed.
Look at all the identity theft info they ask for.
Scary.
Frederick
[Original Message]
From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Date: 7/13/05 10:04:22 AM
Subject: [OFF TOPIC] Altogether too
From: George Hathaway
All,
Perhaps comparing Naudin's tube with an EIMAC
3CW2A power triode may be instructive. Frolov/Moller
probably obtained the Russian equivalent from St.
Petersburg, where he lives, from Svetlana (also in
St. Pete's). See
Yes, we figured out the Svetlana connection a couple of weeks ago
on the atomic hydrgogen forum:
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
but it doesn't help much, since a modified hydrogen filled-tube
was ordered from the factory for this experiment.
This filament is thoriated as well whereas the MAHG is not
No conspiracy, OK - only the story now has "major important" changes? What else are we not being told, or are we not to ask questions anymore?
Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jones Bëene wrote
But when you look at the test reports, when JLN runs the device on
full DC power, he is able to input 1324 watts, which seemingly
couldn't happen if this power was all going to a filament with a
resistance higher than an ohm.
Plus even then (full DC) he is
Terry Blanton wrote:
Has anyone heard of any large ICEs being fueled by hydrogen?
Have a look at
http://www.cumminswestport.com/
although they only list Hythane (hydrogen enriched natural gas) in their
alternative fuels for hydrogen, rumour has it that they are hydrogen ready
and this is
From: John Harris
Have a look at
http://www.cumminswestport.com/
although they only list Hythane (hydrogen enriched natural gas) in their
alternative fuels for hydrogen, rumour has it that they are hydrogen ready
and this is certainly their aim, unlike some other promises on the net they
On Slashdot today:
http://politics.slashdot.org/politics/05/07/12/2054216.shtml?tid=160tid=219
For decades, people have dreamed about building colonies at the
five LaGrange points, intersections in space where gravitational
and centrifugal forces balance out to provide orbital stability.
Chris,
I dont' follow you...help me out...
only the story now has major important changes?
s
I uploaded the paper that I mentioned here a few weeks ago. I still wonder
whether it has anything to do with cold fusion, but anyway, I added it to
the library. See:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/VysotskiiVthespatial.pdf
- Jed
See:
http://www.reason.com/hod/tb033105.shtml
In this interview, Rutan says many things that I wish cold fusion
developers would realize, such as the following quotes:
. . . [T]he big one was June 21st for the first manned private space flight
where we invited the world's press and we had
Jones Beene wrote:
The official magazine of the U.S. Space Command advocates seizing control
of the LaGrange points before other nations do it. From the article: 'We
face the need to control the chokepoints of the solar system.'
That is the stupidest comment I have read in a long time. How
Jones Beene wrote:
On Slashdot today:
http://politics.slashdot.org/politics/05/07/12/2054216.shtml?tid=160tid=219
For decades, people have dreamed about building colonies at the five
LaGrange points, intersections in space where gravitational and
centrifugal forces balance out to
All,
Yes, notice the filament specs;
http://www.g8wrb.org/data/Svetlana/pdf/3CW2A7.pdf.
Filament: Thoriated-tungsten mesh
Voltage: 7.50
Current @ 7.50V: 100A
How does this fit the JLN published data? Fred and Jones musings?
Regards,
Vince Cockeram
- Original Message -
Assuming that Naudin's Svetlana tubes are modified we need
to know what mods have been applied to the std. Svetlana
tube.
I believe the Moller specs say that the tube wall has a 1
mm sputtered W coating ... pretty thick for sputtering! I
wonder if Fred Jones idea of using Pd, Rh, or Ru in
From: Ron Wormus
I believe the Moller specs say that the tube wall has a 1
mm sputtered W coating ... pretty thick for sputtering!
0.5 mm via plasma spraying according to Moller's project logbook.
In any case, I don't think we are even sure if it is wired
as a grid or a filament so I
From: Terry Blanton
But there is one more, the gap between the cathode and anode is 9.5 mm whose
resonant frequency (full wave) would be 3.16 GHz.
And why, you might ask, is that significant? It's the clock rate for the Intel
Xeon MP processor. ;-)
Am I mistaken? The original story had Eugene being shot to death by one man, now they say he was beaten to death and possibly by two people. Will the story change again and how is what I am leading up to?
Chris
Steven Krivit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,I dont' follow you...help me out...only
- Original Message -
From: Ron Wormus
Assuming that Naudin's Svetlana tubes are modified we need to
know what mods have been applied to the std. Svetlana tube.
Ron,
I'm preparing a list of detailed questions to present to Nicholas
Moller. He seems to be responsive to inquiries and
Vince Cockeram wrote:
All,
Yes, notice the filament specs;
http://www.g8wrb.org/data/Svetlana/pdf/3CW2A7.pdf.
Filament: Thoriated-tungsten mesh
Voltage: 7.50
Current @ 7.50V: 100A
How does this fit the JLN published data? Fred and Jones musings?
I noticed that before on JLN's
Frederick,
Although the JNL specs show otherwise, would you guess that his
cathode is thoriated ? Even if it was, it would not have shown up
in the radiation tests, most likely.
BTW, if anyone has one large as the gangstas like to say, not to
be confused with the reverse wording, then eBay
Speaking of surfing eBay for your next OU project ...
If you are a geek experimenter who likes to fantasize about
building a cheap earth-shaking experiment (something a little more
profound than flubber, Fred), then check out this hydrogen
thyratron - bid now is only 50 bucks or so.
Purdue findings support earlier nuclear fusion experiments
WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. Researchers at Purdue University have new evidence
supporting earlier findings by other scientists who designed an inexpensive
"tabletop" device that uses sound waves to produce nuclear fusion reactions.
The
droool.
it must be mine
On 7/13/05, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of surfing eBay for your next OU project ...
If you are a geek experimenter who likes to fantasize about
building a cheap earth-shaking experiment (something a little more
profound than flubber, Fred),
34 matches
Mail list logo
