Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
How are you going to judge the results? I assume that from a whole
swag of test
kits, the results will vary from no tracks / cm^2 to perhaps 100 or
more / cm^2.
If you get no tracks, you did the etching wrong. When you do it right
there are always some tracks from
At 08:24 PM 9/8/2009, Mike Carrell wrote:
Several investigators have tried IR cameras, including the SPARWARS
group. The video is posted on several siites, but I don't have the
URLs at hand. The video is of codeposition on a nickel screen and is
fascinating to watch, but I'm not sure what it
I should add that the etchant is toxic, like the electrolyte. You
don't want unsupervised kids working with it.
For that matter, I have doubts about the wisdom of letting certain
70-year-old electrochemists work with this stuff. Mizuno I watched
Ohmori work with boiling electrolyte in a
2009/9/8 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
At 09:08 AM 9/8/2009, you wrote:
Yes indeed, codeposition + looking for tracks in CR-39 are the keys to
low cost (very low material cost, very low equipment cost), the
question is, as I asked recently in another thread where I got no
answer,
Michel Jullian wrote:
That a chemical attack of the CR-39 occurs in those cells is not
debatable, see . . .
However, this problem was fixed by putting plastic film between the
CR-39 and the electrolyte.
I find it unfortunate that the most recent /less verified CF
experiments always seem
An unfolding story- and elegant and convincing demo (of something) :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T0d7o8X2-E
Rotatable Michelson-Morley Interferometer experiment.
Possible implications:
1) An optical gravitometer?
2) the mirrors and/or the beamsplitter experience a torque
3)
isnt designing and refining experiments, removing uncontrolled
variables, and then repeating hte hell out of something until you stop
getting new data, a major part of science?
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Jed Rothwelljedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Michel Jullian wrote:
That a chemical attack
I should add as possible implications:
1)An optical gravitometer?
.. one that may detect virtual photons (i.e. as an indicator of gravitons).
If the mainstream is correct on gravitons, then detection of individual
gravitons, although not prohibited by any fundamental law, would be
[Snip] 4) A 4th dimension interface is measureable perpendicular
to gravity vector?
[Reply] The research by Di Fiore et all proposes opposite to gravity
vector not perpendicular. An equivalent acceleration first considered by
Italian researchers Di Fiore et all in a 2002 paper Vacuum
I decided to clean up and improve the EPRI NSF conference
proceedings. I asked Ed if he has a better photo of some equipment
shown on p. 13-14, an automated sample changer. He said you might
find something like that in a museum. That brought to mind a story
about our late friend Chris Tinsley
At 12:04 AM 9/9/2009, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:58:43 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
How are you going to judge the results? I assume that from a whole
swag of test
kits, the results will vary from no tracks / cm^2 to perhaps 100 or
more /
And that reminds me of yet another story! Along similar lines . . .
The Smithsonian museum of History and Technology opened in 1964 and
not long after my father took me there. We went straight for the
section with trains and ships, which has both models and actual steam
locomotives and the
At 09:22 PM 9/8/2009, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Consider a clear piece of CR-39 on the flat bottom of a glass cell.
The CR-39 has distinctive marks on the bottom. On top of it is a
coiled-up gold wire, resting on it. Co-deposition. Underneath the
cell, looking up, is a
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I have no idea what the results will look like.
They will look like a Rorschach test. And people will interpret them
along similar lines.
I'm not interested in whether or not there is a CF reaction.
Then I see no point to this project. The only reason to an
nice video.
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
2)the mirrors and/or the beamsplitter experience a torque
If that is the cause wouldn't you expect the fringe shift to occur four
times in a revolution rather than the two shifts observed?
harry
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Incidentally, the Smithsonian gets the story of the first computer bug
right, unlike many sources. The term long predates computers. See:]
There was a bug in the fantastic movie Pi:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0138704/
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Underneath the cell, looking up, is a microscope, focused, through
the CR-39, on the wire. The assembly is in a light-tight box. What
will the microscope camera see while the cell is operating? Nothing?
It will see nothing. The CR-39 has to be removed from the cell
You mentioned a cure for cancer that worked in your case. I think you should
elaborate on this. Much as I like abduction stories, I think cures for dread
disease get the priority.
Thanks
I miss Chris and Soo. :(
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:10:58 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
nice video.
Indeed. Typical German gründlichkeit. It's one of the best short science
videos I have ever seen, and I find it very convincing.
Analogous to the discovery that the electric and magnetic fields are
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
If it were easy, everyone would have done it years ago and we would have
cold fusion powered cars by now. The political opposition could not have
stalled it this long if it were easy to reproduce.
Has there been any
You can still chat with Soo. I have run across her online recently.
NT
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:48 PM, albedo5 albe...@gmail.com wrote:
I miss Chris and Soo. :(
I have always considered mass to be an aether sink. This experiment
needs to be performed on the space station.
Terry
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
An unfolding story- and elegant and convincing demo (of something) :
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:23:11 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
A chip outside the cell, as I said. This is a crucial issue. Another
difficulty is ensuring that you etch both the control and the sample
with the same procedures and concentration of etchant. The
concentration
Terry Blanton wrote:
Has there been any progress on the Matthey Pd?
As far as I know they stopped working on it after the IMRA project in
France collapsed. The collapse was mainly caused by a fight over who
would control the intellectual property rights to the palladium. I
have no idea
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
Surely both control and sample can be etched concurrently in the
same solution?
That would remove any difference in processing.
That is the usual procedure.
I believe problems arise when they do one blank and multiple readings
in the cell.
Another issue arises
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
Has there been any progress on the Matthey Pd?
As far as I know they stopped working on it after the IMRA project in France
collapsed.
Considering Abd's goals, this gives us a lot to think about.
MM expected the ether to be standing still relative to the earth orbiting
around the sun hence their horizontal experiment but if this new vertical
experiment is validated then what? Could we consider this a 90 degree shift
like current through a coil that expands a magnetic field at 90 degrees to
Pd is FCC at 389 pm. Pd atom radius is 137 pm (interesting number
:-). This leaves 115 pm which allows the 102 pm NH3 molecule ideal
for structuring but is challenging for the 188 pm Ar.
I'm gonna sleep on this.
BTW, what is the Van der Waals radius of deuterium? (too lazy to look
it up now.)
I would bet, if you could grow single crystal Pd ( in a NH3
atmosphere), it would load quickly. And if you modulate it with a 26
Mhz signal (lambda = unit cell length), you could have controlled CF.
Or not.
Terry
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Pd is
Let me add a post-script. Since 2000, the ENEA researchers have put a lot of
effort into understanding and fabricating palladium. They have done a good
job. I have not made a rigorous comparison, but I think their material now
rivals the best J-M material from the IMRA program. It puts out about
Please elabourate.
What differences do you expect?
Harry
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2009 6:06 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Michelson-Morley Interferometer experiment finally
done correctly?
I have always considered mass to be an
At 09:56 AM 9/9/2009, Michel Jullian wrote:
I also recall an old SPAWAR codeposition experiment claiming to
produce tritium, which they mentioned in a recent review of their
work. If that was not bogus, tritium being very easy to detect
unmistakably, what else is needed to prove CF is
At 02:54 PM 9/9/2009, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I have no idea what the results will look like.
They will look like a Rorschach test. And people will interpret them
along similar lines.
Great. The kids will learn a lot about science.
I'm not interested in whether or
At 03:45 PM 9/9/2009, you wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Underneath the cell, looking up, is a microscope, focused, through
the CR-39, on the wire. The assembly is in a light-tight box. What
will the microscope camera see while the cell is operating? Nothing?
It will see nothing. The
At 06:15 PM 9/9/2009, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Surely both control and sample can be etched concurrently in the
same solution?
That would remove any difference in processing.
My concept is that we would etch many chips at the same time, not
only for uniformity, but also for efficiency.
36 matches
Mail list logo
