2009/10/3, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
One of the interesting SPAWAR
results is IR imaging of the cathode, showing that the cathode
temperature is substantially higher than that of the electrolyte.
I don't think this proves anything, I doubt IR imaging can distinguish
between
Hi Frank
I pretty much understand what you're trying to do. And I'm trying to
show you that it's absurd. You're trying to use descriptive geometrical
tools(reference frames) to try to model physical reality. You're putting
a microscopic reference frame inside a Casimir cavity, and then trying
to
At 02:35 AM 10/4/2009, Michel Jullian wrote:
2009/10/3, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
One of the interesting SPAWAR
results is IR imaging of the cathode, showing that the cathode
temperature is substantially higher than that of the electrolyte.
I don't think this proves
At 09:11 PM 10/3/2009, Horace Heffner wrote:
What has been lacking is testing a (3rd particle) seeding concept as
an augmentation to a protocol that has already been shown to work for
CF fairly reliably, such as SPAWAR's codeposition methods.
Making this easy is part of what I'm trying to do.
On Oct 3, 2009, at 5:06 PM, Frank wrote:
The spatial confinement combined with the equivalence boundary
suggests the 10E-14 newtons of acceleration calculated by DiFiore
et all is
a vector wholly on the time axis -no trig portions of the spatial
axis, the
force was ignored as
Mitchell's refusal of any rewriting of his work seems understandable
to me. Would image pdf with underlying text for searchability satisfy
both belligerents and put an end to this lengthy dispute?
Jed? Mitchell?
Michel
2009/10/1, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Horrace,
I have no issue with your math and understood perfectly how little
force anything raised to the -E14 represents. The issue is that any force is
there at all. It represents a tiny crack in the isotropy of gravity. I agree
that it is an inconsequential force between two plates.
I can support Michel's point. In my observation of Mitch's work, his 'style'
is his own, and uses acronyms and concepts which are precise but peraps not
'mainstream'. Jed has, at times, publicly said he doesn't understand terms
Mitch uses. So there may be a mistrust that Jed in the action of
On Oct 4, 2009, at 7:37 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 09:11 PM 10/3/2009, Horace Heffner wrote:
What has been lacking is testing a (3rd particle) seeding concept as
an augmentation to a protocol that has already been shown to work for
CF fairly reliably, such as SPAWAR's codeposition
9 matches
Mail list logo
