For formal submission to: Max Planck Institute-- m...@mpe.mpg.de
r...@mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de vortex-l@eskimo.com -- From Jack
O'Suileabhain(eng.O'Sullivan) aka Jack 'Harbach' O'Sullivan
Planck's Constant Revised ***
* * * Postulated necessary
At 10:00 AM 10/4/2009, you wrote:
Mitchell's refusal of any rewriting of his work seems understandable
to me. Would image pdf with underlying text for searchability satisfy
both belligerents and put an end to this lengthy dispute?
No rewriting has been proposed. File translation has been
Hi Mauro,
Please call me Fran - It is how I distinguish bill collectors from good
people, Yes you pretty much have my argument with only a couple misplaced
assumptions, Yes I do have a twin hydrogen that somehow communicates with me
that he is much older not younger -not going into a
At 12:37 AM 10/5/2009, Horace Heffner wrote:
Supporting this is not my aim. I did not join your list. In fact, I
may mount a competing operation at some point if a good experiment
emerges. I suggested a similar effort about a year ago on another
list, with the difference being that I suggested
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
wrote:
Have you noticed
United Nuclear? Seems like a nice company I'm tempted to buy some of
their toys.
Did you know it was run by Bob Lazar? Yes, he is the same one who
allegedly worked in section S4 of Area 51.
If I understand Jed's requirements, he is asking for image-over-text, which
means the image file is
what one sees, but that there is text associated with each image that allows
one to do full text
searches. Thus, there is NO reason for Dr. Schwartz's concern about 'editing',
since the original
Mark Iverson wrote:
If I understand Jed's requirements, he is asking for image-over-text, which
means the image file is
what one sees, but that there is text associated with each image that
allows one to do full text
searches.
Actually, I would call that image over text. I prefer an
On Oct 5, 2009, at 5:46 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I've purchased some LR-115; I will cut it up, I plan to serialize
the chips, and I'll be selling them in small packages. If you want
to give some away, you could either subsidize what I'm doing, or
you could buy your own material
2009/10/5 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net:
On Oct 5, 2009, at 5:46 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
...
Well, not in the cell, and I
won't be using it on cells where I want to observe the cathode with a
microscope during the experiment. Unless it's on the opposite side, a
possibility,
For $1 per mile. Saves a fortune and people love it.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,559780,00.html
At 06:19 PM 10/5/2009, Michel Jullian wrote:
2009/10/5 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net:
I wish you success in your research.
So do I, Abd. I wish I had more time to contribute to your project,
but you seem to be progressing impressively swiftly in spite of the
very limited help you've
- Original Message -
From: Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net
Date: Monday, October 5, 2009 11:33 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rothwell and Bad Science
I still haven't seen an approval by Dr. Schwartz posted here on
Vortex-l... And it's pretty much
already written as I've seen at least two
Hey, SSE just published a new magazine on alt-science, edited by Patrick
Huyghe of The Anomalist.(I'm buying the paper version, so they'll
actually earn a few dollars.) http://www.scientificexploration.org/edgescience/
---
EdgeScience Magazine
New from SSE!
Why EdgeScience? Because,
13 matches
Mail list logo
