If I understand Jed's requirements, he is asking for image-over-text, which 
means the image file is
what one sees, but that there is text associated with each image that allows 
one to do full text
searches.  Thus, there is NO reason for Dr. Schwartz's concern about 'editing', 
since the original
page images will be what people see... 

I still haven't seen an approval by Dr. Schwartz posted here on Vortex-l... And 
it's pretty much
already written as I've seen at least two posts that suggested the verbiage!  
Wouldn't take him more
than a minute or two to post it and clear all this up.

-Mark


-----Original Message-----
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:47 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rothwell and Bad Science

At 10:00 AM 10/4/2009, you wrote:
>Mitchell's refusal of any rewriting of his work seems understandable to 
>me. Would image pdf with underlying text for searchability satisfy both 
>belligerents and put an end to this lengthy dispute?

No "rewriting" has been proposed. File translation has been proposed. 
When you send in a paper for publication, that's what you normally get. In the 
translation, it is
possible that some error might occur, it is possible that it might not be 
noticed. However, this can
happen with all publication. Image with text is possible, I'm sure, but there 
is also a bandwidth
issue. A simple solution has already been proposed, that Mitchell give Jed 
permission to copy the
papers as hosted on newenergytimes.com. Now, if that is image with text, it 
might still be some
problem for Jed.

If Jed wants the library to be more complete, he might bend a little. 
If Mitchell wants his papers to be somewhat more available, he might bend a 
little. And if neither
will bend, well, the rest of us will survive. I noticed that Jed retracted the 
"extortion racket" 
hyperbole. That was appropriate. And I also noticed that Mitchell stopped 
making the accusations
that Jed was lying. That was also helpful.  

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.420 / Virus Database: 270.14.3/2415 - Release Date: 10/05/09 
06:19:00

Reply via email to