Kyle Mcallister wrote:
A few days ago, I attempted to post a message. It was rejected with
the following message:
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
|flist vortex-l
(reason: Cannot open input)
(expanded from: vortex-l@eskimo.com)
I had the very same
Horace Heffner wrote:
The journal name abbreviations are from an approved list that Ed
Storms copied from Los Alamos years ago. I found an on-line version
at U. British Columbia:
http://www.library.ubc.ca/scieng/coden.htmlhttp://www.library.ubc.ca/scieng/coden.html
[snip]
Indian J.
Good ideas all. I was playing that song with my left hand on the piano,
right hand on the organ,
and feet on the drum and symbol.
Can you believe it, I never had a music lesson.
I could use a singer. Jed, can you sing?
Frank
From Don W.:
http://www.bloomenergy.com/
http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/411/
http://green.venturebeat.com/2010/02/19/fuel-cell-maker-bloom-energy-finally-sheds-cloak-of-mystery-this-sunday/
Google the following:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
bloom energy fuel cell
- - - - - -
Here-here: Yes indeed this is the 'classic' picture. However; because we are
a relatively 'low-density' energy 'bubble/universe' within a
Hyper-density/hyper-speed/hyper-fluidic(thusly HYPER-GRAVIONIC) DarkEnergy
Carrier wave AEXO-COSMOS;-- the BIG-CRUNCH 'classic' theory is fundamentally
Scott:
THE EASY ADJUSTMENT: per John Wheeler would be:-- BAE-Constant @ 1E= {5.6 *
10^94 g / cm^3} and then 'work-up' from there.-Jack-
From: scott...@hotmail.com
To: alset9te...@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: ZPE GRAVITY is 'GRAVION WAVE'=The TACHYON-WAVE
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:26:54
Attention Bill, I figured you'd find this interesting.
http://www.dump.com/2010/02/13/smoke-ring-collision/
Its two vortex rings of different colored smoke hitting each other
head on. Very cool.
California Institute of Technology (Caltech) researchers have demonstrated
flexible solar cells that absorb up to 96 percent of incident light, by growing
arrays of silicon wires in a polymer substrate.
That's astounding! Who would have though it would be so symmetrical.
It must be perfectly still air inside the test box.
- Jed
http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/411/
I think Bloom Energy is looking to install 100 Kilowatt power units
in everyone's houses. These will be flex-fuel, but likely running
mostly on natural gas. They will also probably produce heat, and
cooling, as well as power, making the devices roughly 85%
Don't forget the electric car in the garage.
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 9:12 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The BLOOM BOX
http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/411/
I think Bloom Energy is looking to
Terry Blanton wrote:
http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/411/
I think Bloom Energy is looking to install 100 Kilowatt power units
in everyone's houses. These will be flex-fuel, but likely running
mostly on natural gas. They will also probably produce heat, and
cooling, as well as power, making
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Rick Monteverde r...@highsurf.com wrote:
Don't forget the electric car in the garage.
Nope. That's where I put the blooming Bloombox.
The car needs about 20 hp to take me to work. That's about 30 kWh
both ways. Considering I sleep with the lights off, I
My friend who lives in the St. Ives Country Club has a 50 kW diesel.
His house is about 8,000 ft^2.
100 kW is just ridiculous. You have to supply fuel still.
Buy the 10 kW unit and one my my fine load management centers I am
presently designing. :-)
T
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Jed
From Terry:
http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/411/
I think Bloom Energy is looking to install 100 Kilowatt power units
in everyone's houses. These will be flex-fuel, but likely running
mostly on natural gas. They will also probably produce heat, and
cooling, as well as power, making the
The thing's huge! And add the fuel tank too. Not practical for a car.
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 9:41 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The BLOOM BOX
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Rick Monteverde
Numerous claims of anomalous heat between atomic hydrogen and catalysts
supports the [url=http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0507193v2]relativistic;
hydrogen theory of Jan Naudts[/url]. Naudts theory resolved the controversy
regarding fractional hydrogen but introduced relativistic hydrogen inside a
I was wondering if all the little rings persisted. I also wondered what would
happen if both rigns were emitted from the same side but took different paths
so that one ring could come up behind the other ring.
Scott
Hey Guys!
(This could really be significant. I smell a Nobel Prize cooking here!!!)
If this relativistic cavity thing is true, then the nuclear reactions will be
accelerated! This opens up the Cold-Fusion thing, the Z-PEC concept, not to
mention, this experiment might release
Storms responds, Krivit responds:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/blog/?p=126#comment-7388
That's a splendid little video, and an elegant demonstration of spin
conservation. I urge people to see it.
The air particles and spin both rotate 90 degrees as a result of the
collision. Fascinating!
It would be interesting to see how this works in a low pressure cell, close
to vacuum. I wonder
I have the print edition. I don't know why I keep giving these jerks my
money . . . Anyway, see:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=fusions-false-dawn
Fusion's False Dawn ( Preview )
Scientists have long dreamed of harnessing nuclear fusion—the power plant
of the stars—for a safe,
From: Jed Rothwell
* That's a splendid little video, and an elegant demonstration of spin
conservation. I urge people to see it.
. if it is authentic, it is splendid indeed.
* The air particles and spin both rotate 90 degrees as a result of the
collision. Fascinating!
. that is
better quality video here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJk8ijAUCiI
harry
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, February 22, 2010 8:13:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Smoke ring collisions
That's a splendid little video, and an elegant demonstration of spin
On 02/22/2010 04:56 PM, Steven Krivit wrote:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/blog/
The article begins:
According to an Oct. 5, 2009, press release on the Lyndon LaRouche
Political Action Committee Web site,
Say ... what??
On 02/22/2010 08:38 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
*From:* Jed Rothwell
Ø That's a splendid little video, and an elegant demonstration of spin
conservation. I urge people to see it.
… if it is authentic, it is splendid indeed.
It looks authentic enough -- but it's *NOT* smoke rings.
It's dye
http://serve.me.nus.edu.sg/limtt/
the creators
FLUID MECHANICS GROUP
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
National University of Singapore
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Jed Rothwell
Ø That's a splendid little video, and an elegant
-Original Message-
From: Stephen A. Lawrence
It looks authentic enough -- but it's *NOT* smoke rings... It's dye in
water.
That is more likely, but unless the speed has been altered, water viscosity
would likely not permit that kind of apparent speed.
I suspect that if it is not
Extraordinary Error -- no electric field exists inside a conducting liquid
in an insulated box with two external charged metal plates, re work by
SPAWAR on cold fusion since 2002 -- also hot spots from H and O
microbubbles: Rich Murray 2010.02.22
29 matches
Mail list logo
