2010/3/26 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Are there any published works showing nuclear phenomena such as excess
heat, correlated with deuterium percentage? I'm starting with 99.9% D2O
(atom percent D). What would be the difference I should expect with 98%
Just so I understand what all the fuss is about.. Is it because he is
pushing neutron capture when he is supposed to be unbiased? I watched the
Youtube presentation and frankly I liked it. How often does neutron capture
occur normally? Does neutron capture get accelerated by catalytic action?
2010/3/27 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
At 07:39 AM 3/26/2010, Michel Jullian wrote:
No wonder, the cold fusion experimenters say my cell makes excess
heat but they won't let skeptics see it with their own calorimeter.
I intend to fix that, you know.
Good. Obviously, common
Michel Jullian wrote:
Storms
says that with electrolysis the Pd preferentially absorbs the H atoms so
the
concentration of H in the lattice is soon higher than in the starting
liquid.
Interesting. If this is true, it must be a purely electrochemical
effect, probably related to the
I never quit! I was temporarily locked out for a short time due to a
misunderstanding.
As I have said several times, I quit CMNS only because I am lazy about
keeping track of information, and I don't want to upset anyone there.
Francis X Roarty wrote:
Just so I understand what all the fuss is
At 06:30 PM 3/26/2010, Michel Jullian wrote:
2010/3/26 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Michel Jullian wrote:
So, you would not believe the Wright brothers unless they let you fly
their
airplane?
A better analogy is that I would not believe them unless I saw them
flying it with my
At 04:07 PM 3/26/2010, Peter Gluck wrote:
Dear Abd,
I am starting the weekend rush to write my great editorial for the
issue no 396 of my wekly newsletter Info Kappa ( I am working for an
American Romanian ISP UPC Romania)
The subject is primitive and I will use much of the book Caveman
Logic
At 07:37 PM 3/26/2010, Michel Jullian wrote:
I am just stating a fact, not judging the validity of anybody's
claims.There would be no airplanes today if the Wright brothers hadn't
allowed skeptics to judge their claims with their own instruments
(=own eyes in their case). Luckily, they were not
Dear Abd,
Thank you!
I will quote Birtukan as soon as I am writing about some positive concept-
not as now.
I perfectly understand your love and happiness given by your daughters. It
is wonderful to help them and to see how brave and nice they are.
I had a very tragical history with my son Robert
Finally read the blog comments for Buzz Skyline's rant. You said it
all, Jed, clearly and cogently, and if Riordan had been listening,
he'd have heard it. He's not willing to do any work, because he
already thinks he knows the answer. At that point, once that has been
established, it's a waste
See:
http://nextbigfuture.com/2010/03/george-h-miley-presentation-on-nuclear.html
George sure has some imagination! I wish Arthur Clarke could have seen this.
I *love* ambitious stuff like this!
- Jed
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Anyone want to share the booth? It could be difficult for me to fund this
myself, though it makes good business sense for me to go.
Don't get ahead of yourself! First make the co-dep thing work.
Confer with Miles about co-dep procedures. He is a top-notch
Jones wrote on 3-27-10:
... there is no need for a liquid if we can dispense
with electrolysis.
IMHO this is probably a significant way in which
LENR is maturing ... -- gas phase. Why not? There is
little advantage to electrolysis as it actually hinders
loading. The ~4:1 loading ratio of Arata
At 04:34 PM 3/26/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I doubt that James Riordon will generate a lot of angry mail to
Bernstein. I hope not.
I could hope so, in fact, because it could cost Riordon his job. I
don't actually think that way, though. Let's say that it might be a
good thing if Riordan is
At 04:42 PM 3/26/2010, Horace Heffner wrote:
We should not shrink from looking in the mirror! We have only begun
to scratch the surface of a very large parameter space.
Huge, truly enormous parameter space. Scary parameter space, compared
to the much simpler space of plasma fusion. Messy,
At 11:34 PM 3/26/2010, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
Something ate our friend. If the professional is still alive in the
belly of the whale, he'll be back. Maybe even a new, improved version.
Meanwhile, those who are close to him can still communicate with him
where he sits, in his
On Mar 27, 2010, at 11:25 AM, Taylor J. Smith wrote:
Is it possible to have room temperature and low pressure
plasma cold fusion reactions?
If the results of Claytor et al. are considered cold fusion, then the
answer is probably yes. Claytor used a low pressure gas regime,
involving
At 01:53 PM 3/26/2010, Peter Gluck wrote:
First of all- thank you! I also think that somewhere we have to get
rid of palladium and replace it with something cheaper and more abundent,
And is a provocative and/or nasty assertion that now we still do not
understnd the science?
We don't
It was recently opined here that it is not the job of a reporter to
challenge dogma. This was followed up with another opinion: That the job of
a reporter is to find and present facts - that science reporters should find
and present scientific fact.
Personally, I think challenging dogma IS one
At 05:10 AM 3/27/2010, Michel Jullian wrote:
2010/3/27 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
I intend to fix that, you know.
Good. Obviously, common sense starts at IQ 159 in CF researchers ;-)
Geez, I mention the result of one test told to me in the 1950s, and
it keeps bouncing back.
At 05:55 AM 3/27/2010, Francis X Roarty wrote:
Just so I understand what all the fuss is about.. Is it because he
is pushing neutron capture when he is supposed to be unbiased? I
watched the Youtube presentation and frankly I liked it. How often
does neutron capture occur normally? Does
Abd,
Thanks- I kind of figured there was more to it than I was processing. I
asked about the normal rate of neutron capture because I thought it might
change with fractional hydrogen. Always the optimist I find myself looking
for the mechanism by which it could work. I really feel we already
At 02:07 PM 3/27/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Anyone want to share the booth? It could be difficult for me to fund
this myself, though it makes good business sense for me to go.
Don't get ahead of yourself! First make the co-dep thing work.
Yeah, I get it. The APS
23 matches
Mail list logo
