[Vo]:4 recent long slide shows re many lines of nanoscale research relevant to Widom-Larsen LENR theory: Rich Murray 2011.05.29

4 recent long slide shows re many lines of nanoscale research relevant to Widom-Larsen LENR theory: Rich Murray 2011.05.29 This is my first exploration of the extremely complex and fertile realm of Widom-Larsen low energy nuclear reaction theory, which often involves 10E11 ev/m electric fields [

Re: [Vo]:Rossi on Gamma

Let's suppose that 100% of what Rossi tells is 105% true. 100% of the time. Then what about this: " My process has nothing to do with the process of Piantelli,” Rossi wrote. “The proof is that I am making operating reactors; he is not.” (New Energy Times) In this case it is an error to use the da

Re: [Vo]:Rossi on Gamma

Here is “Evidence of electromagnetic radiation from Ni-H Systems” http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/FocardiSevidenceof.pdf Emissions derived from undefined nuclear reactions were detected in three successive experiments in a temperature range between 350 and 750 K. On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:

Re: [Vo]:in Rossi reactor demos, electric input power boils away some of the cooling water: Rich Murray 2011.05.26

http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/05/06/nasa-working-on-lenr-replication-and-theory-confirmation/#comments NASA Working on LENR Replication and Theory ConfirmationPosted on May 6, 2011 by Steven B. Krivit Dr Dennis Bushnell, chief scientist at NASA’s Langley research center told New Energy Time

Re: [Vo]:in Rossi reactor demos, electric input power boils away some of the cooling water: Rich Murray 2011.05.26

At 07:01 PM 5/29/2011, Rich Murray wrote: Hi Abd, I notice also since Jan 14, 4 months later, that AFAIK, no one else has set up and run and reported any kind of HNi gas cells that show any level of anomalies -- maybe there are teams that you know about that aren't publicly disclosing interestin

Re: [Vo]:The Summer of ECat

At 06:39 PM 5/29/2011, Rich Murray wrote: Is setting up a tinier Pt wire anode for your DPd codeposition going to delay your first attempt to try out your kit cell -- I am keenly interested in what turns up -- will you have a simultaneous control cell? I originally planned to have a hydrogen co

Re: [Vo]: Why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular?

I know the calculations exist, but that is not my forte. What can we detect from the magnetic component of an EM wave? What we detect is the electric force it places of charges, this force is orthogonal to the magnetic field and is identical to the electric component. In other words the only way

Re: [Vo]: Why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular?

On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote: > The > fact > that you have an explanation, and that it seems to coincide with my ideas > about both, the electric and magnetic fields, > and the aether, does not mean that that explanation is accepted and > mainstream. You might consider studyi

Re: [Vo]: Why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular?

Sorry, I was away during the weekend. I think the same as you about the electric and magnetic fields(they both are aspects of the same thing). And I have stated it clearly in other mails, by the way. I just wanted to hear, and was trying to understand, the standard explanation. If you think tha

Re: [Vo]:in Rossi reactor demos, electric input power boils away some of the cooling water: Rich Murray 2011.05.26

Hi Abd, I notice also since Jan 14, 4 months later, that AFAIK, no one else has set up and run and reported any kind of HNi gas cells that show any level of anomalies -- maybe there are teams that you know about that aren't publicly disclosing interesting results -- can you confirm or discomfirm a

[Vo]:ZHydrogen.com

Jeff Driscoll has put up a website that introduces himself to alternative energy enthusiasts - and helps the layperson understand Randell Mills' CQM theory. http://zhydrogen.com/ The goal of the website is to find funding for both initial experiments and eventually to start a company and licen

Re: [Vo]:The Summer of ECat

In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Sun, 29 May 2011 18:23:51 -0400: Hi, [snip] >>If the Mills effect is nuclear, then it also has to function in a gas/plasma >>(see some of Mills' early experiments with e.g. Sr, Ar.) > >Aw, geez, folks. No, CF doesn't function in a plasma. Period. My po

Re: [Vo]:The Summer of ECat

Is setting up a tinier Pt wire anode for your DPd codeposition going to delay your first attempt to try out your kit cell -- I am keenly interested in what turns up -- will you have a simultaneous control cell? -- there is a minute possibility that the cell could interact with neutral dark matter p

Re: [Vo]:Rossi on Gamma

At 12:12 AM 5/29/2011, Terry Blanton wrote: That's one heck of a frequency conversion! No, it simply requires that the gammas be absorbed by the apparatus. That, I believe, places an upper limit on the gamma energies, but I'm not about to calculate it, and this would also depend on the shiel

Re: [Vo]:The Summer of ECat

At 06:33 PM 5/28/2011, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 27 May 2011 20:59:34 -0400: Hi, [snip] >Not being a mills expert, how do we know the Mills effect is not nuclear? >No radiation and/or transmustation? If the Mills effect is nuclear, then it also has to fu

Re: [Vo]:The Summer of ECat

At 06:29 PM 5/28/2011, you wrote: Perhaps more important is the fact that a working E-cat means confirmation of a new source of energy. Once that is accepted many more people will start working on improving the output, as Jed has often said. The interesting thing to me is that this argument

RE: [Vo]:Blondlot on observing N-rays with the naked eye.

At 02:16 PM 5/28/2011, Mark Iverson wrote: It is widely known that the 'rod' cells in the retina, which are responsible for seeing in low light levels, are more concentrated just outside the center of focus, and the 'cone' cells primarily responsible for color vision, are more concentrated in t

Re: [Vo]:in Rossi reactor demos, electric input power boils away some of the cooling water: Rich Murray 2011.05.26

Rich Murray: Clearly, the simple evidence so far made available shows that the input electric heater power is enough to raise the water flow to boiling. The Rossi reactor is a scam. I congratulate Joshua Cude on his outstanding clarity and attention to significant details. It remains to be

RE: [Vo]:The Summer of ECat

At 08:53 PM 5/27/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote: At 04:52 PM 5/27/2011, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: Cost to refuel is crucial. $5000 for 4800 hours run time is $1.04 per hour, or $0.41 per kWh, compared to $0.15 from my local power company. Is Defkalion losing money on every E-Cat but making up for

Re: [Vo]:Joshua Cude at it

At 05:18 AM 5/29/2011, Joshua Cude wrote: 1. First and foremost, the device must be completely and obviously standalone. So, disconnect the hydrogen bottle, and the mains power input. - The hydrogen bottle should be easy because they claim so little hydrogen is consumed, and in some experimen

Re: [Vo]:Joshua Cude at it

At 04:52 AM 5/29/2011, Joshua Cude wrote: It occurred to me that the Fukushima disaster occurred partly *because* it depended on external power for cooling in the event of an unintentional shut-down. Modern reactors have passive emergency cooling systems that do not depend on power of any kind.

Re: [Vo]: Why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular?

At 04:31 AM 5/29/2011, Joshua Cude wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: Lomax>The world is so complex that math can be useless, unless simplifying assumptions are made. It is certain simplifying assumptions tha

RE: [Vo]: Why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular?

So you are postulating that: "What mainstream calls a magnetic field is really a 'relativistically distorted electric field'." Okay, that's a good start... But then you say, "...ignoring the fact that I have already essentially proven that magnetic fields are non-existant..." I'm afraid that

RE: [Vo]: Why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular?

John: I think you will find that many regular contributors on this list are of the same mind, in that they consider as a real possibility the existence of some kind of aether. There are numerous alternative aether-based hypotheses, but the mainstream scientific community doesn't have much inter

Re: [Vo]:Joshua Cude at it

At 04:29 AM 5/29/2011, Joshua Cude wrote: Lomax> As Rothwell said. Cude is simply repeating a common myth. That mainstream science regards CF as a mistake is a fact you have admitted. Not a myth. Cude's understanding of what I say is shallow and biased. There is no "mainstream science," so

Re: [Vo]:Joshua Cude at it

At 04:00 AM 5/29/2011, Joshua Cude wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: Lomax> That work was done before the turn of the century. The source is the conversion of deuterium to helium. The mechanism for this is

Re: [Vo]:Joshua Cude at it

At 03:54 AM 5/29/2011, Joshua Cude wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: Cude>> You find it so hard to believe that a few hundred cold fusion researchers can all be wrong, but if cold fusion is real, then far fa

RE: [Vo]: Why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular?

Jones said: "Maybe I can make this clearer with a bit more contemplation ..." Contemplation and a Brain Enhancing ElixiR should do the trick! Or is it too early... :-) -Mark <>

RE: [Vo]: Why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular?

Very thoughtful answer ... ... in fact the part about shear strain density seems to have relevance to what I was trying to verbalize wrt the interplay between temperature, electrical conductivity and mechanical strain in a few alloys: especially constantan and similar strain gauge alloys. Hope t

Re: [Vo]: Why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular?

On 5/25/2011 1:12 AM, Mark Iverson wrote: Just wanted to throw out a question to the Vort Collective... In an EM wave, why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular to each other? The answer to the question is really quite simple and it comes from our definition of what these fields ar

Re: [Vo]:Joshua Cude at it

Joshua- this will need some discussions but I think eventually we can establish a Perfect Experience Protocol for Indiviual E-Cats- that is satisfactory both from the points of view of engineering and of the sane bureaucracy of standardization. i am opting for fully quantitative and not for "common

Re: [Vo]: Why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular?

Ok, as you might guess from my email address I very much disagree that the aether was proven false, nothing of the sort. Only a static Aether was found to have evidence against it. Secondly if you still want to know why Electric and Magnetic fields are perpendicular in an EM wave etc... then you

Re: [Vo]:Joshua Cude at it

On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Peter Gluck wrote: > Dear Joshua, > > in case your approach to the New Energy is constructive > and not destructive would you contribute seriously to: > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/05/call-for-perfect-e-cat-experiment.html > ? > > what experiment, what

Re: [Vo]:Joshua Cude at it

On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > But, Joshua, what about Fukashima? Do you think that the reactor there needed to be "plugged in" -- for safety -- meant that the energy produced was doubtful? It occurred to me that the Fukushima disaster occurred partly *because* it

Re: [Vo]:Joshua Cude at it

Dear Joshua, in case your approach to the New Energy is constructive and not destructive would you contribute seriously to: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/05/call-for-perfect-e-cat-experiment.html ? what experiment, what results will convince you that the device is producing useful energy

Re: [Vo]: Why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular?

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Mark Iverson wrote: >Don't you get any enjoyment from creative, out-of-the-box thinking? You're right. I shouldn't have weighed in on this subject, but I couldn't resist when you said: "With all the sophistication and accuracy to umpteen decimal places in atomi

Re: [Vo]: Why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular?

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: Lomax>The world is so complex that math can be useless, unless simplifying assumptions are made. It is certain simplifying assumptions that led to the conclusion that QM predicts that LENR is impossible. This was already a problematic as

Re: [Vo]:Joshua Cude at it

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: Cude>>To the extent they believe cold fusion is real based on existing measurements, then in the opinion of mainstream science, they are mistaken. Every last one of them. Lomax> As Rothwell said. Cude is simply repeating a common myth.

Re: [Vo]:Joshua Cude at it

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Cude>> To the extent they believe cold fusion is real based on existing measurements, then in the opinion of mainstream science, they are mistaken. Every last one of them. Rothwell> That is incorrect. Mainstream scientists have not published

Re: [Vo]:Joshua Cude at it

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > The mainstream started shifting sometime around 2005, What is your evidence for this? The fact that NW published a few papers on CF? In 2000 the J of Electroanal. Chem. stopped publishing (positive) papers on CF. It has not restarted

Re: [Vo]:Joshua Cude at it

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: Lomax> That work was done before the turn of the century. The source is the conversion of deuterium to helium. The mechanism for this is unknown, but the conversion would have a characteristic energy of 23.8 MeV/He-4, regardless of mecha

Re: [Vo]:Joshua Cude at it

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: Cude>> You find it so hard to believe that a few hundred cold fusion researchers can all be wrong, but if cold fusion is real, then far far more researchers would have to be wrong. Lomax> This is the core of Cude's religious position: