Re: [Vo]:OT Global Warming

Sunspots do reduce the solar input and during peak sunspot activity it can be as high as 15% more or less. Think about it. Sunspots are dark; Dark spots emit less light. So more sunspots, less light. Less light, less Solar input. Less solar input should mean less average global temperature ri

Re: [Vo]:OT Global Warming

On 02/06/2013 12:27 AM, Chuck Sites wrote: > Haha. Yeah I saw that story, It's just bait for the deniers > (or contrarians), or just weird science to normal folks. For that > matter, mushrooms exhale CO2.Trust me, worms are not the cause of > global warming. > > I want to reply to Craig's

Re: [Vo]:OT Global Warming

Haha. Yeah I saw that story, It's just bait for the deniers (or contrarians), or just weird science to normal folks. For that matter, mushrooms exhale CO2.Trust me, worms are not the cause of global warming. I want to reply to Craig's comments and to argue scientifically against his denial

[Vo]:It's Alive!

This paper that you can find from one of the links gives more details than I have seen before. http://aromapress.com/~defkalio/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ICCF-17-Hadjichristos-Technical-Characteristics-Paper.pdf Seems they claim they can get a COP of 22

Re: [Vo]:OT Global Warming

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Brad Lowe wrote: It isn't just AGW we need to worry about... > EAGW Earthworm-Accellerated Global Warming is the new hot topic in Climate > Change Research. > > > http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2013/02/global-worming-are-earthworms-accelerating-climate-change > Th

Re: [Vo]:OT Global Warming

It isn't just AGW we need to worry about... EAGW Earthworm-Accellerated Global Warming is the new hot topic in Climate Change Research. http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2013/02/global-worming-are-earthworms-accelerating-climate-change This is peer-reviewed hard science, so please refrain from mocki

Re: [Vo]:Near miss - hopefully

You have to wait in line for that job. NASA or whoever builds the gun might be able to sell the rights. The only downside is that you have to take aim without a telescope since that gives the asteroid a fair chance. The federal department of game and fishery establishes the rules for hunting

Re: [Vo]:Near miss - hopefully

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Terry Blanton wrote: > >> >> Paintball railgun. > > > From Earth, you mean?!? Wow! We gotta make one of them. Splat the moon! I want to shoot it!

Re: [Vo]:Near miss - hopefully

Terry Blanton wrote: > Paintball railgun. > >From Earth, you mean?!? Wow! We gotta make one of them. Splat the moon! I recall that in the early 1950s someone planning a moon rocket thought about loading it with flower or white powder so that when it impacted on the moon they would be able to l

Re: [Vo]:It's Alive!

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Harry Veeder wrote: > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: >> Harry Veeder wrote: >> >>> >>> http://aromapress.com/~defkalio/technology/ >> >> >> Nothing at this URL. >> >> - Jed > > > Hmmm it was working when I first posted it to vortex-l. > > Harr

Re: [Vo]:It's Alive!

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Harry Veeder wrote: > >> >> http://aromapress.com/~defkalio/technology/ > > > Nothing at this URL. > > - Jed Hmmm it was working when I first posted it to vortex-l. Harry

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

Hi, On 5-2-2013 23:49, Jed Rothwell wrote: Alan Fletcher mailto:a...@well.com>> wrote: In Great Britain they say: my garden is smaller that England, but bigger than a stamp. OOOkay. Does anyone want to hazard a guess as to what that might mean? Found a similar quote on this page (

Re: [Vo]:Near miss - hopefully

Paintball railgun.

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

Alan Fletcher wrote: > In Great Britain they say: my garden is smaller that England, but bigger > than a stamp. > OOOkay. Does anyone want to hazard a guess as to what that might mean? In Japan they say "fools and caterpillars like to climb up things." I just learned that yesterday. Not sure

[Vo]:MFMP : The Genius of Celani

Hi Vortex, The MFMP has just released an interesting update on their experiments to replicate the Celani's effect. There is also a contribution from the new protocol used by Celani. http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

> From: "Alan Fletcher" > Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2013 11:43:10 AM > > Don't hold your breath . > Andrea Rossi February 5th, 2013 at 2:42 PM Dear Koen Vandewalle: The scientists are still working and I have no idea of what they are thinking. I do not think we will know what they know an

Re: [Vo]:Near miss - hopefully

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 5 Feb 2013 09:48:08 -0500: Hi, Upon thinking further about this, painting it may not actually make much difference at all, because some of the photons are already reflected, and most of those absorbed are radiated again more or less straight away, roughl

Re: [Vo]:Near miss - hopefully

Painting asteroids is a messy job. The paint drys out fast in empty space. And, by the time you deliver enough paint to do the job, you have spent your national budget on rockets. There has got to be a better way to divert these things. I hope that we will be able to put this job off for at

Re: [Vo]:Near miss - hopefully

In reply to David Roberson's message of Tue, 5 Feb 2013 00:27:20 -0500 (EST): Hi, [snip] >Have you ever tried to paint an asteroid? :-) Have you ever tried to paint half an asteroid? :) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

Don't hold your breath . Broenink February 5th, 2013 at 12:17 PM Daar Mr. Rossi, With the verification of your technology being imminent can you please tell us who financed the independent research and the report which will be published shorty? Andrea Rossi February 5th, 2013 at 1:19 PM

Re: [Vo]:Re: [nVo] Cold fusion, Joshua Cude

[image: schrodingercat] On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Rich Murray wrote: > You may see, real is hopping up and down, communicating with a few > self-selected somewhat more intrepid minds: > > "Dream! Nothing but dream! > > causeless, inexplicable, event surges that are not predictable, > und

[Vo]:Re: [nVo] Cold fusion, Joshua Cude

You may see, real is hopping up and down, communicating with a few self-selected somewhat more intrepid minds: "Dream! Nothing but dream! causeless, inexplicable, event surges that are not predictable, understandable, controllable, measurable, never replicated, yet of apparent immense theoretica

Re: [Vo]:It's Alive!

Harry Veeder wrote: > http://aromapress.com/~defkalio/technology/ Nothing at this URL. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:It's Alive!

> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Terry Blanton > wrote: > > Defkalion's site, that is: > > > > http://defkalion-energy.com/ > > > > and it kinda makes me think that Tesla really was responsible for > > Tunguska. No forum, though. My old link took me to a 404 : http://www.defkalion-energy.com/fo

Re: [Vo]:It's Alive!

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: > Defkalion's site, that is: > > http://defkalion-energy.com/ > > and it kinda makes me think that Tesla really was responsible for Tunguska. > http://aromapress.com/~defkalio/technology/ quote <> unquote If this "internationl scientific c

Re: [Vo]:It's Alive!

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/04/world/europe/oil-tax-forces-greeks-to-fight-winter-with-fire.html?hp http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2013/01/30/whats-been-burning-in-greece/ http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-radio-and-tv-19289566 On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: > D

Re: [Vo]:It's Alive!

The numbers are in line with what we have been expecting. I just hope that they will be willing to allow a qualified group to test one and put this issue to bed once and for all. What can we do to expedite the process? Dave -Original Message- From: ChemE Stewart To: vortex-l Se

Re: [Vo]:It's Alive!

I think each kernel is supposedly 5 MW x 9 in a reactor block On Tuesday, February 5, 2013, Daniel Rocha wrote: > No, what I mean, the energy density of the box is way bigger than I > thought. > > > 2013/2/5 ChemE Stewart 'cheme...@gmail.com');>> > >> Have you seen one ? >> >> >> On Tuesday,

Re: [Vo]:It's Alive!

No, what I mean, the energy density of the box is way bigger than I thought. 2013/2/5 ChemE Stewart > Have you seen one ? > > > On Tuesday, February 5, 2013, Daniel Rocha wrote: > >> (45 kW of thermal energy in a self-contained 45x45x45cm box fully >> automated with internal software and he

Re: [Vo]:Near miss - hopefully

wrote: > True, however I don't see the sense in painting only one side white. Why > not the > whole thing? > That's what I meant. I did not mean to give it a spin. I meant sunlight will push it the way it pushes a Crooks radiometer, although there is some question whether that works in a high v

Re: [Vo]:It's Alive!

Have you seen one ? On Tuesday, February 5, 2013, Daniel Rocha wrote: > (45 kW of thermal energy in a self-contained 45x45x45cm box fully > automated with internal software and heat management system). > > I didn't know it was THAT POWEFUL! > > > 2013/2/5 Terry Blanton 'hohlr...@gmail.com');

[Vo]:It's Alive!

Defkalion's site, that is: http://defkalion-energy.com/ and it kinda makes me think that Tesla really was responsible for Tunguska.

Re: [Vo]:OT - Global Warming

I'm more conservative tha many on tha subject. ther is no doubt that a pile of stupidiy, of scientific errors, of biased data and interpretation, exist on both side. It is surprising tha having suffered in LENr about pathologic consensu, funding propelled corruption of scientific method, ego-prope