I wrote:
I personally am not qualified to judge whether what Ron is saying is
> nonsense. I gather from his interactions with others on
> physics.stackexchange.com, which has some pretty smart people on it, and
> his overall reputation there, that he knows at least the basics of what
> he's talk
Hi Ed. Again sorry for the delayed response and right now all I can give
is a quick response.
Kim's theory is interesting as it's been refined more and more towards
effects at the nano-scale and he's also incorporating proton descriptions
that may allow his theory to describe H in Ni. Kim's work
I have just posted a reference (Plasmons on a patterned surface can
enhance the production of bright electron beams) that describes how a
properly configured patterned surface of cavities and mounds can convert
the heat in the form of plasmons present in a lattice into electrons
localized on that
Hi David, sorry for this late response. Experimentally I know of nothing
that has show fusion in the near absolute zero. It's pretty hard to
achieve a BEC in first place, and specifically one that exposes a nuclear
potential in its wave function. BECs will show superfluity when
it's neutral and s
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Edmund Storms wrote:
In either case, the deuteron does not move. The energy goes into the
> electron that is ejected well away from the atom. When it returns, a 20 keV
> photon is emitted. This process only involves the electron. The process is
> well known and n
http://ecatreport.com/ecat-plant/rossi-only-1mw-plants-available-at-this-time
Eric, there seems to be confusion about how energy is measured and how
it is applied. Let's say that the electron identified as a k shell is
removed by adding 20 keV. The source of this energy is not important.
I assumed it resulted from electron bombardment and you assume it
comes from ph
Axil,
Nicely said but to pick one nit regarding syntax -when you said [snip] These
reactions must be catalyzed by chemical reactions where changes that strictly
involve the motion of electrons in the forming and breaking of chemical
bonds.[/snip] It isn't clear what you are saying is the underl
> The Maimon theory ignores several facts.
>
I'm trying to gather as much feedback on Ron's theory as I can, so that I
can get his comments. If you see anything, please mention it; I'll include
the objections in a followup blog post.
> He proposes that the energy applied to remove an electron f
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:00 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> Kevin, I think that what Dr. Storms is stating about the dangerous
> radiation emission is valid. In your scenario, the balloon is surrounded
> by many others that absorb the high energy emissions. How does it account
> for balloons that
On Feb 11, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Edmund Storms
wrote:
In the case of cold fusion, the process does not produce energetic
products and the final product is an intact helium nucleus.
Nevertheless, the nuclear energy appears as heat. Of
Stewart, I read the article carefully and it does not go into enough detail for
anyone to determine how much energy is involved in the Bosenova release. There
is no mention of any radiation effects either. I suspect that what they are
speaking of is far too small of an energy release to be of
Kevin, I think that what Dr. Storms is stating about the dangerous radiation
emission is valid. In your scenario, the balloon is surrounded by many others
that absorb the high energy emissions. How does it account for balloons that
are very near to the edge of the bundle? If high level energy
You offer an excellent explanation as to where the problems arise in ICE
development. The 6 stroke engines represent a good application of invention.
I do worry about the complications and possibly extra weight that would be
required to make these practical. With a little luck we will see LEN
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Edmund Storms wrote:
In the case of cold fusion, the process does not produce energetic products
and the final product is an intact helium nucleus. Nevertheless, the
nuclear energy appears as heat. Of course, radiation is produced and some
is detected outside of t
The video is of Swartz giving the course.
- Jed
I am both pleased and privileged at your interest in my correct perceptions
of LENR processes. There are so many widely varied instances of these LENR
processes, there must be more than one cause.
There are instances where significant transmutation of elements and
isotopic shifts occurs without th
From: David Roberson
I am a bit confused about your statement that the gasoline engine has a
Carnot efficiency of 65%. If that calculation is just based upon the
maximum temperature of the hot gas within the cylinder as compared to the
cooler exhaust gas, then I would have to seek a reason
No, I did not know that. Bayard protested the injustice by posing as a
drowned man and photographing himself. This helped him to recover from
the treacherous treatment and he continued to practice photography and
it sounds like he was well known while he was alive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hi
I viewed the video and found it quite interesting. There seems to be no end to
the unusual processes that are possible and I suppose that is one of the great
aspects of physics. Science will become quite boring once everything is
understood and there are no new horizons to explore. Fortunatel
Ishida, T., /Study of the anomalous nuclear effects in solid deuterium
systems/. 1992, Tokyo University. p. 131.
http://inspirehep.net/record/337964
Abstract:
"By applying the Kamiokande nucleon decay/neutrino detector to neutron
measurement, we have achieved the unprecedented detection prope
Michael Foster wrote:
As with any significant and potentially profitable new technology, there is
> a storm of treachery, theft, false claims and injustice surrounding it. The
> Daguerreotype is a prime example. . . .
>
Yup. There is usually a storm of treachery, theft and so on.
> Arago did
As with any significant and potentially profitable new technology, there is a
storm of treachery, theft, false claims and injustice surrounding it. The
Daguerreotype is a prime example. Francois Arago, president of the French
Academy of Science, convinced Hyppolyte Bayard to delay publishing his
Axil, your description does not fit what is observed or even what is
generally accepted.
I'm trying to get you to understand the basic difference between cold
fusion and hot fusion. It would help if you read papers that describe
what is observed rather than speculate based on imagination.
On Feb 10, 2013, at 9:47 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Edmund Storms
wrote:
On Feb 10, 2013, at 8:20 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Edmund Storms
wrote:
Storms: NO!!! That is not the issue Cold fusion produces He4
witho
David,
The paper mentioned by Lou is excellent for further consideration on this
forum, despite its title. It represents the best way to achieve OU without
an energy sink, or without nuclear energy. This is on the horizon actually
but on a small scale (watt level).
Perhaps 'Information technology
See:
http://www.buildtheenterprise.org/cold-fusion-explained-at-mit
27 matches
Mail list logo