Jones ,
I am ok with negating the sealed heat engine but since we aren't talking
about combustion but rather what you referred to once as a cold engine I remain
open to a possible sealed cold engine based on changes in isotropy where
reversible chemical reactions runaway when compression
They will open for registration on March 15. See:
http://iccf18.research.missouri.edu/index.php
- Jed
http://ecee.colorado.edu/~moddel/QEL/Papers/DmitriyevaModdel12.pdf
It says Dmitriyeva Haisch, Cantwell and McConnell also worked on this.
The usual suspects!
- Jed
Surprising they didn't test with hydrogen but this approach based on Lamb pinch
and noble gases is at a much lower scale for both geometry and therefore
energy but it may be a better way to ferret out the initial energy source of
LENR... if the ZPE - Casimir hypothesis is correct his approach
Predicted Atomic Collapse phenomenon observed:
http://www.rdmag.com/news/2013/03/long-predicted-atomic-collapse-state-observed-graphene
Why Are the Big Financial Institutions Selling Oil BIG?
http://oilprice.com/Finance/investing-and-trading-reports/Why-Are-the-Big-Financial-Institutions-Selling-Oil-BIG.html
I believe it has nothing to do with LENR and everything to do with
attempting to control inflation because of all of the European and US
money printing (QE).
You see the same large companies doing the same to commodities - As he
mentioned it is being done by JP Morgan and crew but most likely
80% of what the press gives us are false correlations.
This is a good example, actually the impact of the E-cat
is zero and its minstream credibility inexistent. The author probably has a
strong sense of humor
Peter
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Joe Hughes jhughe...@comcast.net wrote:
I
Peter Gluck wrote:
80% of what the press gives us are false correlations.
This is a good example, actually the impact of the E-cat
is zero and its minstream credibility inexistent.
I agree. (You mean nonexistent.)
- Jed
At 12:05 PM 3/8/2013, you wrote:
I believe it has nothing to do
with LENR and everything to do with attempting to control inflation
because of all of the European and US money printing (QE).
You see the same large companies doing the same to commodities - As he
mentioned it is being done by JP
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:52 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Why Are the Big Financial Institutions Selling Oil BIG?
I posted earlier that the US will not support LENR. We are on the
verge of becoming an oil exporter.
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
I posted earlier that the US will not support LENR. We are on the
verge of becoming an oil exporter.
What part of the U.S.? Exxon Mobil? The DoE? General Electric? Ordinary
people, who will save thousands of dollars a year with LENR?
I expect
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I expect opinions will be divided.
I agree. They already are! :-)
actually negative. this can change, in principle.
It is not figuring in such dictionaries:
*Glossary of bullshit business terms*
http://culturaloffering.com/2013/03/08/glossary--.aspx
but, for example:we agree, in principle actually means
no.not,but we will not tell you this just now
The E-cat is
LENR is nowhere close to influencing oil prices, and how can you control
inflation by shorting Big Oil ?
The sell-off could be technology related, however. But it is old and not
green. Curiously - it is Nazi technology, so at least they gave us something
of value. You can call it Messerschmitt
This article from Oilprice.com is a really good bullshit. It will take ages
before LENR will have an impact on oil prices, and therefore on energy
prices. Big banks, and big oil companies will have (or already have) a
strong fight against LENR. But surely it will not be like it's explained in
the
They may be pricing in economic decline in Europe and Japan, together with
China slowing down. In addition, there are reports of an oil find in Australia
that is gonzo freakin' huge. Like tens of trillions of dollars in reserves.
Europe is taking note of the shale boom, too. Better than coal,
You're one minor and one major industrial revolution behind in this
analysis:
Minor: The emergence of the east Asian giants has already fundamentally
changed the political economics of technology deployment. They are much
less encumbered than is the West and much more motivated to apply their
From: Roarty, Francis X
I am ok with negating the sealed heat engine but since we aren't talking
about combustion but rather what you referred to once as a cold engine I
remain open to a possible sealed cold engine based on changes in isotropy
where reversible chemical reactions runaway
Ex nihilo: Dynamical Casimir effect in metamaterial converts vacuum
fluctuations into real photons
March 8, 2013 by Stuart Mason Dambrot
Copyright © PNAS, doi:10.1073/pnas.1212705110 (Phys.org)
—In the strange world of quantum mechanics, the vacuum state (sometimes
referred to as the quantum
Don't know why the subject didn't show up.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Ex nihilo: Dynamical Casimir effect in metamaterial converts vacuum
fluctuations into real photons
March 8, 2013 by Stuart Mason Dambrot
Copyright © PNAS,
I don't understand what you exactly mean here? I'm aware of the new
robotization revolution (Baxter robot, and the same arm multi purposes
robots ...), but anyway, you can't change the all economy in a few winks.
Moreover, in the beginning, there will have a huge fight against LENR by
lobbyists
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 8 Mar 2013 13:12:54 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
http://money.cnn.com/2013/01/14/news/economy/california-oil-boom/index.html
Note that it follows the San Andreas Fault.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
You didn't click through the link and watch the presentation by Anderson.
Do so.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Arnaud Kodeck arnaud.kod...@lakoco.bewrote:
I don't understand what you exactly mean here? I'm aware of the new
robotization revolution (Baxter robot, and the same arm multi
I did! Thank you for it. Nothing special I'm aware of.
Do you belief than LENR will change the energy market in less than 3 years?
_
From: James Bowery [mailto:jabow...@gmail.com]
Sent: samedi 9 mars 2013 01:01
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Speculation on Rossi from
Ah, I only read as far as your phrase will take ages where you called
bullshit. 3 to 4 years out (not exactly ages ), you're right: the
futures contracts are unlikely to be significantly altered by the
announcement of fully functional Hot-CAT from Rossi or similar announcement.
On the other hand
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
On the other hand the market cap of oil company shares take into account
the value of resources in the ground and those quite possibly could be
affected significantly within 3 to 4 years of such an announcement.
A close friend of mine is an economist.
It would be interesting to look at the surface of the inflation-adjusted
price of triode vacuum tubes vs volume shipped through time from 1947.
The same surface, substituting total market cap of vacuum tube companies
for triod vacuum tube price would be an interesting comparison.
On Fri, Mar 8,
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
In other words, it is not just the commodity value in 4 years that matters.
In this situation the oil companies would be like companies manufacturing
vacuum tubes in 1952, after transistors were announced. Even though
Erratum: surface - parametric curve
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:44 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be interesting to look at the surface of the inflation-adjusted
price of triode vacuum tubes vs volume shipped through time from 1947.
The same surface, substituting total
31 matches
Mail list logo
