I rode my electric bike today. I looked at various brands, Izuma, and ebike.
They cost about $2K with a lithium ion battery. I purchased for the 1KW Magic
Pie kit. It was about $400 for the motor and about $400 for the LiPo 36 volt
10 amp hr. battery. It runs well but it will never compete
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:14 PM, wrote:
> How about +1/2 + -1/2 = 0?
Is negative spin spatial orientation?
Its a great car. My lease is ~$230 a month, 36 months, but we traded a car
in and ended up with a $2500 rebate. So the math is a bit fuzzy.. Better to
try to get a quote for a no-money down lease. For a while you could get
the lease to under $200/mo if you didn't want the 440VAC charge capability
Brad Lowe wrote:
My 2 cents on electric cars... One, I don't think we have to wait for
> "quick charging" to be invented for electric cars to be a good value as a
> second car. I've been driving a Nissan Leaf for about 3 months. My wife
> uses it to go to work and I use it when I can.
>
I am je
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:43:43 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>Well this is obviously above my pay scale. How is spin conserved when the
>particle is formed from the collision of 2 protons?
>
>Silly me, I forgot that 1/2 plus 1/2 equals zero when you can throw 9 zero$
>at it.
>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
>
> are not known with a great deal of imprecision
double negative
Harry
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Harry Veeder
>
>>> Astronomers refined the star's age down to about 14.5 billion years
> (which
>>> is still older than the universe), from the original data showing 16
> billion
>>> years old. In either event
Well this is obviously above my pay scale. How is spin conserved when the
particle is formed from the collision of 2 protons?
Silly me, I forgot that 1/2 plus 1/2 equals zero when you can throw 9 zero$
at it.
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
> Well, since it is a boson, in Vegas
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
>> Well, since it is a boson, in Vegas the smart money sez it is an integer
>> which excludes 0.
>
> But, grasshopper, to be Higgs, it's mass, color and spin must all be zero:
>
> http://en
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Well, since it is a boson, in Vegas the smart money sez it is an integer
> which excludes 0.
But, grasshopper, to be Higgs, it's mass, color and spin must all be zero:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson
Well, since it is a boson, in Vegas the smart money sez it is an integer
which excludes 0.
Seriously, all elementary particles which are thought of as carrying forces
are said to be spin-1. Is there any reason to suspect otherwise?
An interesting question is - if a particle exists in all dimensio
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder
>> Astronomers refined the star's age down to about 14.5 billion years
(which
>> is still older than the universe), from the original data showing 16
billion
>> years old. In either event it is way older then the Milky Way - yet there
it
>> is - not t
Chris Zell wrote:
>
> but let's see the practical implementaion of LENR before we get too
> visionary. This thing is getting too long in the tooth already.
>
Yup.
>
> I wanna see a whole practical demo as a TED lecture which ends with Monty
> Python style taunts addressed to the oil companie
why doesn't anyone ask about the origin of energy?
Harry
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Let’s say the historic “value” is/was abound 125 GeV.
I'm glad you find value in their value; but, there are two values
involved (although some might say spin zero is a non value.) They
have not yet determined the spin of the particle whose
A cynic would say that there has been a "value" floating around, almost as a
meme. maybe for 30 years, and this value keeps coming up in models, and is
hinted at in beam-line data from time to time, and its getting more and more
precise over time - but it is a high value and the means to "see it" h
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
>> Astronomers refined the star's age down to about 14.5 billion years (which
>> is still older than the universe), from the original data showing 16 billion
>> years old. In either event it is way older then the Milky Way - yet there it
>> is
The Higgs is getting ahead of the horse. Just because a particle within this
mass range has been discovered does not prove that it is a special one.
Perhaps someone should show that the discovery actually performs a function
before they jump too high and far. I have to be skeptical in this ca
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Hmm ... don't be so quick to write Puthoff off wrt Higgs. It may not have
> been a "former requirement" but things change.
Well, we don't yet have a five sigma horse to put before the cart yet.
The alleged Higgs might have a different spin
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com in reply to Terry Blanton's message:
>>> The idea is that the ZPE is the provider of *all* mass to all things.
>> Is this an elaboration of or a replacement for the Higgs field?
> I don't think Higgs is a requirement for the Puthoff theory.
Co
A bit LERN bypassed story.
Have look at this for a better reason to divest in Oil:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/12/05/usa-energy-independence-renewable/1749073/
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Chris Zell wrote:
> **
> Yeah, LENR could make depolymerization cheap eventually..
Yeah, LENR could make depolymerization cheap eventually...but let's see the
practical implementaion of LENR before we get too visionary. This thing is
getting too long in the tooth already.
I wanna see a whole practical demo as a TED lecture which ends with Monty
Python style taunts addres
I don't remember an anecdote, but the prime piece of "basic" physics
information for understanding a catalyst effect is the EM near-field.
Many profs do not understand this very well either, since it is
multi-disciplinary. The profs who are not polymaths are often relegating to
teaching undergrad
I wrote:
> I predict that eventually this process will produce oil more cheaply than
> digging it out of the ground and shipping it long distances. It will also
> be safer.
>
I do not mean right away, or even 10 years after cold fusion becomes
common. I suppose it will be gradual. After decades
Chris Zell wrote:
**
> If LENR became practical, I think oil would sink to a level of value
> consistent with the need for lubricants and petrochemicals such as plastic.
>
The value of oil would sink lower than than. I think people would soon find
ways to synthesize lubricants and petrochemicals
If LENR became practical, I think oil would sink to a level of value consistent
with the need for lubricants and petrochemicals such as plastic.
Hi Keng,
I am trying to locate an Anecdote regarding the current state
of catalytic theory in physics with a little help from vortex, I will
forward it to you if someone finds the link. I can understand NTSB use of
the term short circuit but I agree it is misleading.
Regards
F
I recall reading an Anecdote about 2 professors arguing over catalytic
action and how to teach it to 3rd years when they suddenly realize they are
unable to teach even a simple basic theory that freshman could
understand.does anyone recall having read same or possibly have a link to
it?
Fran
28 matches
Mail list logo
