Fine!
What would it take to build a sensor based on this physics
http://www.habmigern2003.info/future_trends/infrared_analyser/ndir/IR-Absorption-GB.html
?
One IR-LED and maybe 4 photo diodes, or a prism combined with a linear CCD?
Some slow ADCs in a cheap MCU.
It seems possible to do this
this is nice, I have waited this long time and data is finally here. Planck
satellite data can make cosmology finally a real empirical science, not just
playground for speculators.
My predictions are that the flat geometry is confirmed and there are no
positive evidences for inflation
Un-particle? Are they suggesting hole current not balanced by electron
current?
From: Ron Kita [mailto:chiralex.k...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:31 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Superconductors= No Electron Conduction
Greetings Vortex,
Hi Ron,
This is surprisingly amateurish abstract, to be coming from phys.org. but I
guess they do not have an inclination to be more precise in a what amounts
to a PR writeup for an article they sell for more than Amazon charges for a
novel.
EEs have long suspected that some physicists
Jouni - for what it is worth, Iagree and also think it is flat and that
Dirac's large number hypothesis (with slight modification) is correct - i.e.
there is a time variation in the gravitational constant so not all the red
shift is from expansion but some from larger G in the past. It is
Gravitational balance might be countered in local areas by condensation of the
matter nearby. Gravity attraction is a non linear function and would not
remain constant with time as matter is affected. I once modeled a simple
system with several equally spaced units in a line connected by
So far the microwave background is still best explained by standard
cosomology. That doesn't mean big bang cosmology is right (since a
flat universe obviously counts against it). The claim to fame of big
bang cosomology is still the cosmic microwave background. No other
cosmology predicted it.
The unparticle will give guys like Ed Storms who believes in rigorous
enforcement of the conservation laws a nervous breakdown because in a metal
lattice, electron like particles seem to spring into existence out of the
vacuum when the environment becomes just right.
There is reference in
not exactly true. There are theories like integrated starlight and
thermalization-- if the universe is infinite. The Big Bang has problems with
the horizon problem and the anisotropy of the background and polarization of
the background if it started from a single point. It also has
Yes, and there's one other inconvenient problem for the Big Bang. You might
recall a few years ago when infrared telescopes were revealing previously
invisible galaxies in the range of 8 to 11 billion light years away. The
galaxies didn't look anywhere near as young as they ought. This is one
Don’t forget the inconvenient problem of the Methuselah star - and also nothing
more exotic than general relativity, which has the interaction of gravitational
fields producing a repulsive force at cosmological distances, see: Jefimenko's
Last Word by Jeffery Kooistra.
There is no doubt about big bang cosmology. We know with very good accuracy
that the universe is exactly 13.772 ± 0.059 gigayears old. For example the
dating of second generation star HD 140283 supports well this age estimate.
There are several other dating methods also.
The problem is that
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.comwrote:
There is no doubt about big bang cosmology.
An assumption that I think would be good to further examine is that the
speed of light has remained constant. If it varied over time, conclusions
about rate of expansion of
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2007/jun/18/the-hunt-for-unparticles-is-on
What are unparticles? Here is the explanation.
The first paper published on unparticles:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0703260v3.pdf
Superconductivity and Unparticlescitation near bottom of the website:
http://phys.org/news/2013-03-electrons-cuprate-superconductors-defy-convention.html
Ron Kita
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Axil Axil
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2007/jun/18/the-hunt-for-unparticles-is-on
What are unparticles? Here is the explanation.
quote All particles exist in a state with a certain energy, momentum
and mass. In most of
16 matches
Mail list logo
