the difference is that it needed no instrument to be observed (levitation),
and that physicist have replicated it, and not only chemist...
The tragedy of LENr is that is chemistry experiment, indirectly measured
through invisible characteristic needing confidence in instruments and
computation
The man difference:
HTSC was discovered too early in the good place.;
CF was discovered also too early but in the worst place
wet electrochemical system- where it is inherently unmanageable
irreproducible and can not grow up. A scientific tragedy.
Peter
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Alain
There could be something in torsion as a factor in gravitation. It seems
that spin can effect gravitation, specifically rotating magnetic fields.
Spin gives rise to torsion. Maybe the effects of torsion on gravitation are
not as small as Einstein thought.
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Kevin
There is a pre-theory of formative hypothesis which explains some of the
mechanism of HTSC from physical observations.
Joe Eck, who is the Jed Rothwell of HTSC - has this theory listed on his site
as “PWD theory”.
http://www.superconductors.org/pwtheory.htm
Notably - the
Evans is a narcissistic crackpot. He makes elementary conceptual mistakes.
---
I write a little. I erase a lot. - Chopin
From: Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday,
Such a theory is reducible. Reducible theories are always wrong.
It is sometimes said that the Einstein-Cartan theory is the same as GR, but it
is not. Every new theory provides a new context which is a permanent addition
to physics. For GR, it is the idea of background independence, that the
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0607186
---
I write a little. I erase a lot. - Chopin
From: Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 11:47 PM
Subject:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Joe Eck, who is the Jed Rothwell of HTSC - has this theory listed on his
site as “PWD theory”.
http://www.superconductors.org/pwtheory.htm
I suspect he's not the Jed Rothwell of HTSC, but instead perhaps the John
Rohner
Yes, a major difference was that LENR was discovered when there was an
established, entrenched group which stood to lose out of their public
feeding trough if it were true. That was not the case with HTSC. No one
lost their funding or ruined their career when they investigated HTSC.
On Sun,
It is impossible to resist the intuition that HTSC and LENR are closely
related. In both cases a mechanism that makes bosons from fermion pairs remains
to be theoretically explained. It is very thrilling, because the existing model
of matter has been exhausted of explanatory power.
One of the results of ECE theory as noted in a summary of the theory at
http://www.aias.us/index.php?goto=showPageByTitlepageTitle=Overview_of_ECE_Theory
is the following relative tospin coupling:
“ Paper 121 gives the conservation theorems of ECE and paper 116 the continuity
theorems. The
It's not Lorentz invariant even as a limit of a wider transformation group.
Evans made an elementary error. Forget about it.
-drl
--
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 7:41 PM CDT Bob Cook wrote:
One of the results of ECE theory as noted in a summary of the theory at
Shipov's vid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyyENvwJ4L8
There is a paper- First Principles study of Electronic structure,
structural Properties and superconductivity of Nickel Hydride with the
following relevant information:
Our result conclude, a non occurrence of superconductivity in NiH. But, due
to the addition of hydrogen atom we observe
14 matches
Mail list logo
