Re: [Vo]:questions on McKubre cells and AC component

2014-10-24 Thread H Veeder
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > H Veeder wrote: > > >> Ok so you can design a calorimeter to detect this particular endothermic >>> reaction, however, if you don't know a-priori what type of endothermic >>> reaction or what energy source is involved a "standard" calorimet

Re: [Vo]:questions on McKubre cells and AC component

2014-10-24 Thread Foks0904 .
Thanks for the clarification Jed. Easy to misunderstand the 3%. On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Foks0904 . wrote: > > If this is purely in reference to the 3% gain chronicled by McKubre years >> ago in the old [EPRI] report, we already know that might be an ambiguous >> r

Re: [Vo]:questions on McKubre cells and AC component

2014-10-24 Thread Jed Rothwell
H Veeder wrote: > Ok so you can design a calorimeter to detect this particular endothermic >> reaction, however, if you don't know a-priori what type of endothermic >> reaction or what energy source is involved a "standard" calorimeter might >> fail to detect it. >> >> Harry >> >> > ​Another pot

[Vo]:Protons Hog the Momentum in Neutron-Rich Nuclei

2014-10-24 Thread H Veeder
Protons Hog the Momentum in Neutron-Rich Nuclei https://www.jlab.org/news/releases/protons-hog-momentum-neutron-rich-nuclei ​quote <<...the researchers compared the momenta of protons versus neutrons in these nuclei. According to the Pauli exclusion principle, certain like particles can't have th

Re: [Vo]:questions on McKubre cells and AC component

2014-10-24 Thread H Veeder
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 7:48 PM, H Veeder wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Jed Rothwell > wrote: > >> H Veeder wrote: >> >> >>> ​Photosynthesis is an endothermic reaction but instead of absorbing heat >>> energy it absorbs light energy. >>> I doubt a calorimeter would detect that.

Re: [Vo]:MFMP interviews spokesman from WILLIAMSON

2014-10-24 Thread Robert Dorr
If you measured at 2.5u you would be dealing with IR directly emitted from the interior of the hot cat because at that wavelength the alumina would be somewhat transparent to IR. Measuring at the wavelengths they did the IR cameras were only reading the surface temperature because of alumina

Re: [Vo]:MFMP interviews spokesman from WILLIAMSON

2014-10-24 Thread Alan Fletcher
Worth listening to, but they were talking at cross-purposes at times. 3-way complication between reflectance, emission and transmission. Said that wires could cause shadows. (But not, by my analysis from a diffuse source. unless the wire is very close to the surface). Their system can be used

Re: [Vo]:questions on McKubre cells and AC component

2014-10-24 Thread H Veeder
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > H Veeder wrote: > > >> ​Photosynthesis is an endothermic reaction but instead of absorbing heat >> energy it absorbs light energy. >> I doubt a calorimeter would detect that. >> > > The light source would have to be inside the calorimeter to

[Vo]:OT: Fire From Ice

2014-10-24 Thread H Veeder
"...you can see it is getting very optically clear..." Ice Fire Pt 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owF15LQT78o "...and there you have it, fire from ice!" Ice Fire Pt 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rL8Nt73gpY Harry

Re: [Vo]:questions on McKubre cells and AC component

2014-10-24 Thread Jed Rothwell
H Veeder wrote: > ​Photosynthesis is an endothermic reaction but instead of absorbing heat > energy it absorbs light energy. > I doubt a calorimeter would detect that. > The light source would have to be inside the calorimeter to affect the process, so yes, it would detect the energy from the l

Re: [Vo]:questions on McKubre cells and AC component

2014-10-24 Thread H Veeder
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Foks0904 . wrote: > > If this is purely in reference to the 3% gain chronicled by McKubre years >> ago in the old [EPRI] report, we already know that might be an ambiguous >> result . . . >> > > McKubre never reported a 3% gain. Even with hi

[Vo]:MFMP interviews spokesman from WILLIAMSON

2014-10-24 Thread H Veeder
MFMP interviews a spokesman for the company Williamson which specializes in non-contact temperature measurement. They discuss the problem of measuring the temperature of Alumina at higher temperatures. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3O3bSu6N7vwcDJUWGl1Y0pmTWs/edit?pli=1 (15 min. audio only must

Re: [Vo]:questions on McKubre cells and AC component

2014-10-24 Thread Jed Rothwell
Foks0904 . wrote: If this is purely in reference to the 3% gain chronicled by McKubre years > ago in the old [EPRI] report, we already know that might be an ambiguous > result . . . > McKubre never reported a 3% gain. Even with his calorimeter that would be in the margin of error at the bottom o

Re: [Vo]:questions on McKubre cells and AC component

2014-10-24 Thread Ruby
This guy is spamming lots of our Youtube's. I let him post the same exact tome on two or three of our videos, but after that, I deleted his comments. Ruby On 10/24/14, 7:46 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote: Barry Kort on Dr bob blog reported challenging critiques of McKubre experiments http://www.drb

Re: [Vo]:questions on McKubre cells and AC component

2014-10-24 Thread Foks0904 .
*Correction: Not ELFORSK, EPRI On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Foks0904 . wrote: > If this is purely in reference to the 3% gain chronicled by McKubre years > ago in the old ELFORSK report, we already know that might be an ambiguous > result, and what does it have to do with the 60 Minutes pre

Re: [Vo]:questions on McKubre cells and AC component

2014-10-24 Thread Foks0904 .
If this is purely in reference to the 3% gain chronicled by McKubre years ago in the old ELFORSK report, we already know that might be an ambiguous result, and what does it have to do with the 60 Minutes presentation? I don't really care if they're able to shoot down one series of ambiguous experim

Re: [Vo]:questions on McKubre cells and AC component

2014-10-24 Thread Foks0904 .
I'd wager this isn't a terribly important critique, considering it's on a guys blog and at-a-glance not even approaching the authority of a white paper. If I had to guess, I'd gamble this has been either implicitly or explicitly covered elsewhere somewhere in the literature. The thing about armchai

Re: [Vo]:questions on McKubre cells and AC component

2014-10-24 Thread James Bowery
Could this explain figure 3 in Storms's paper "The Status of Cold Fusion (2010) "? On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > Barry Kort on Dr bob blog reported challenging critiques of McKubre > experiments > > http://www.drboblog

[Vo]:questions on McKubre cells and AC component

2014-10-24 Thread Alain Sepeda
Barry Kort on Dr bob blog reported challenging critiques of McKubre experiments http://www.drboblog.com/cbs-60-minutes-on-cold-fusion/#comment-37932 maybe some already have the debunking, the correction... i imagien it is addressed: About a year after CBS 60 Minutes aired their episode on Cold

[Vo]:Open Letter to the Hot Cat Testers

2014-10-24 Thread Peter Gluck
I have just published an Open Letter with basic questions iaddressed to the scientists who have done the Hot Cat test in Lugano. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/10/open-letter-to-authors-of-hotcat-lugano.html I hope we can start a real dialogue- it could be relevant for understanding on wha