Why would the act of measurement take the absolute value rather than, say,
the real component of the complex value?
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 6:44 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
If the speed light in a vacuum c had a real and an imaginary components
too, then the components could vary
It seems that for hot fusion ising FLIR camera is quite common
https://www.fusie-energie.nl/sites/default/files/2013_53004.pdf
can someone competent interpret that study?
I've caught that industrial article
http://www.azosensors.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=92
what I am searching is an
http://money.cnn.com/2014/10/28/news/economy/russia-oil-price-100-dollars-budget/
It's interesting to see that Russia's economy is based largely on oil.
If LENR+ were to be replicated in a credible way tomorrow, for example, in
some sort of device that didn't require external power to continue
from my community watch it seems LENR is quite popular among Russian
pro-putin supporters... to break the blocus that USA is trying to
establish by current tactics.
be careful about information around Rossia. the level of disinformation is
as huge as WMD, ISIS, Syria,Iran... in fact it is the
Greetings Vortex-L,
IF my memory is correct...the Redford movie: Three Days of the Condor
..is about oil wells.
Which leads to the assasination of the CIA readers. In my town when I
first went on-line
there were members of our 'tech group that were readers.
I asked if our computer club
from the helping hints of Warthog I found those documents
a reference book
Use of infrared thermography for industrial heat balance calculations
https://archive.org/details/useofinfraredthe1129krei
and an interesting reference article
Infrared thermography for convective heat transfer
Greetings Vortex-L.
Normally..most Mars speculation images are not worth noting and
of poor content, but IMHO this is an exemption.
http://www.examiner.com/article/mars-evidence-of-intelligent-design-earth-valve-found-nasa-image-report
There could be a simple earth fabricated valve
There's plenty of better images of machinery and intelligently built artifacts
on Mars than that ( especially from the
Pathfinder rover ). Just zoom and pan hi-res images at random, about 1 in 5
has some anomalies. They can be
verified by comparing images of the same place from different
From: Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 2:52:17 AM
It seems that for hot fusion ising FLIR camera is quite common
https://www.fusie-energie.nl/sites/default/files/2013_53004.pdf
can someone competent interpret that study?
No, but I did notice :
The IR
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
From the point of the calorimeter heat is not absorbed since no heat
vanishes.
The energy does vanish! You put in X amount of electricity but only a
fraction of X comes out. The
From: Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 4:17:39 A
and an interesting reference article
Infrared thermography for convective heat transfer measurements
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00348-010-0912-2
That one's (at least partly) downloadable.
That looks a lot like the impression left from a Philips screw head that has
been pressed into the soil, since the image is from the Microscopic Imager it
would be helpful to know the scale of the impression, if the artifact is in the
2 to 8 mm range, I would guess that part of the
Pancreatic, no less.
I am in total agreement with the statements from Bob. In every simulation that
I have conducted using LTspice the system input power is accurately determined
by the product of the constant current source DC value and the average DC
voltage measured at the node of entry. During my testing I
http://www.google.com/patents/WO2007030740A2?cl=en
abstract
Gamma radiation (22) is shielded by producing a region of heavy electrons
(4) and receiving incident gamma radiation in such region. The heavy
electrons absorb energy from the gamma radiation and re-radiate it as
photons (38, 40) at a
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
We imagine sometimes that Oil is the source of all our problems. But
LENR+ could be a geopolitical nightmare as it completely upends the fragile
balance of things.
I assume that once LENR starts making its way
as McKubre says, that cast many questions, thus doubts on the precision of
the results.
anyway, an error in emissivity have to be of 3.6 to explain current
situation.
this level of error , especially once you notice that the assumed
emissivity at 1250-1400C is 0.4, and the one at 450 is 0.7,
I've updated my paper to include a couple of those links (thanks!) and to
correct an error.
http://lenr.qumbu.com/blackbody_141102A.php
Conclusion : WITH proper calibration their results would have been valid.
Without them I remain in the inconclusive zone.
Mind giving some decent examples to take a look at?
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. hoyt-stea...@cox.net
wrote:
There's plenty of better images of machinery and intelligently built
artifacts on Mars than that ( especially from the
Pathfinder rover ). Just zoom and pan
As much as I would like to find evidence of life or prior life on
Mars, I have to agree that the object shown in the picture is just an
impression of one of the Mars Curiosity Rover instruments. If you
look you will see that the big rock in the picture has been moved as
if something pushed
I'll do that when I have some time later, but there are plenty of websites
dedicated to that.
Since it takes quite a lot of time to go through hi-res images with a fine
tooth comb, I stopped doing that once I was
convinced that there were one or more civilizations that resided on Mars 2
Seems like a gamma absorber may be a good source of energy for space ships
flying near a star. The heavy electrons may induce catalyzed fusion like muon
catalyzed fusion in hydrogen.
I am becoming more and more convinced that the SPP phenomena is related to
LENR.
Bob
- Original
Dr Tom Van Flandern's Mysterious Mars Lecture
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgzkjsMmRZg
Hoyt
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
too bad.
do you think it is anyway possible that COP=1 even if 3.6 is uncertain ?
usin just emissibity it seems simply impossible that COP=1.
it would imply crazily high and low emissivity for alumina depending on
temperature ?
anyway in that domain, doubt even on the amplitude only is deadly.
24 matches
Mail list logo