Re: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

Maybe what Mills has found in the survey of his many catalysts is the propensity of these catalysts to generate nano particles when heated. His hyfrino states could be accounted for by the rotation counts of SPPs as the SPPs rotate inside the soliton vortex that have been generated by these nano

RE: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

From: Arnaud Kodeck Ø It is known that Rossi uses Fe2O3 to increase the splitting of H2 molecules into H atom. How is this known, Arnaud ? I have heard it before, but there are many rumors floating around the internet concerning Rossi’s catalysts, most of which are guesses or based

Re: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

If you remember, a considerable amount of Ca was found as a component of the fuel in Rossi's reactor.. also >From the last pages of the Rossi test report in the section: Results ECAT ICP-MS and ICP-AES "Sample 2 was the fuel used to charge the E-Cat. It’s in the form of a very fine powder. Besid

RE: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

Thank you Jones for the details. Rossi Hot cat starts to have a COP>1 at lower temperature than Parkhomov. It is known that Rossi uses Fe2O3 to increase the splitting of H2 molecules into H atom. Rossi might also use CaO for its luminescent property. CaO luminescence is in the NIR range, not the FI

RE: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

Ø … if SPP are shown to be the major contributor to thermal gain in Cole’s experiment (or anyone else who jumps into the arena), we may have chopped months or years off of a developmental process that was until recently based on nickel supposedly transmuting into copper. To clarify, this is no

Re: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

Yes, that would be if you filled the whole cell with LiOH and burned every bit of the hydrogen. Of course the true chemical energy potential is likely more than order of magnitude less. Since I didn't measure the actual amounts of the substances added, I did calculations that would grossly overest

Re: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

Yes, that would be if you filled the whole cell with LiOH and burned every bit of the hydrogen. Of course the true chemical energy potential is likely more than order of magnitude less. Since I didn't measure the actual amounts of the substances added, I did calculations that would grossly overest

RE: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

From: Jed Rothwell Aluminum will be oxidized to give off significant energy even in a ceramic mix. Aluminum thermite makes an excellent explosive. It is used in bombs. But the energy density is well below hydrocarbons such as napalm. Yes, but this detail is another reason that I have a gut fee

Re: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

Jack Cole wrote: You can see some calculations I did on potential chemical effects here: > > http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/2015/01/18/status-research/ > That is very helpful! You estimate the potential chemical energy at 121.5 kJ. Quote: "this yields a maximum average output of 1.67 watts over

Re: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

I wrote: > As I said, you can use 43 kJ/g as the maximum energy density by weight. > There is no chemical fuel better than that. If there were, NASA would want > hear about it. > That's not realistic because you need oxygen, as with rocket fuel or torpedo fuel. I gather the most common solid ro

Re: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

You can see some calculations I did on potential chemical effects here: http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/2015/01/18/status-research/ On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Jones Beene wrote: > > >> Not in this case. Apparently you did not read that Jack is using aluminum >> pow

Re: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

Jones Beene wrote: > Not in this case. Apparently you did not read that Jack is using aluminum > powder in the fuel as a safer way to release hydrogen. This is a > replacement for LAH which releases hydrogen thermally. > How many grams? (I do not recall, and I cannot find that number.) As I s

RE: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

From: Jed Rothwell > In any case, the potential chemical energy in this system is negligible, so > we don't need to worry about it. Not in this case. Apparently you did not read that Jack is using aluminum powder in the fuel as a safer way to release hydrogen. This is a replacement for

Re: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

I wrote: > We are analyzing net-energy out vs. net energy in, and chemical energy (as >> potential) is part of the P-in in the calibration. >> > > Jack Cole said, "I'd be convinced with 1.5 (say 135W out vs. 90 in)." > That's power, not energy. He is using the term COP the same way HVAC people >

Re: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

Jones Beene wrote: > We are analyzing net-energy out vs. net energy in, and chemical energy (as > potential) is part of the P-in in the calibration. > Jack Cole said, "I'd be convinced with 1.5 (say 135W out vs. 90 in)." That's power, not energy. He is using the term COP the same way HVAC peopl

[Vo]:more from and about Parkhomov

This serious study is killing any doubts about the Hot Cat effect http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/01/more-from-alexander-parkhomov.html Still much stuff to study- a long video that can be understood 80% even by those who are not speaking Russian or are a bit deaf like your old friend, Peter

RE: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

Arnaud, No there is no "secret sauce," in the sense of a catalyst, if that is what you mean, as this is basically a luminescent cement binder and there could be better ones out there. In general, since experiments are ongoing - it is preferable to optimize the blend first so as not to add confus

[Vo]:2h video with Parkhomov showing his experiment

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTa3uVYuvwg#t=27 Mats www.animpossibleinvention.com

RE: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

From: Jed Rothwell Ø Today, here for the first time that I know of, Beene used "COP" to mean energy out/potential chemical energy. That is not what you meant when you reported a 1.1 COP. That is not correct, yet Rothwell keeps trying unsuccessfully to cover up his incorrect understandi

[Vo]:Second Parkhomov report, in Russian

See: https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Attachment/45-alexander-parkhomov2-pdf/

Re: [Vo]:Electric Car Powered by Salt Water: 920 hp, 373 Miles/Tank

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: > The P85D has dual motors, not four like the Quant. But it makes the Tesla look outright affordable: "It’s a shame, then, that the makers of the Quant e-Sportlimousine had to put their amazing saltwater battery in a car that, should it ever

Re: [Vo]:Electric Car Powered by Salt Water: 920 hp, 373 Miles/Tank

The P85D has dual motors, not four like the Quant. On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:10 AM, David Roberson wrote: >> Would the torque be split into 4 individual portions of 2000 ft-lbs since >> there are 4 motors? > > That doesn't sound right. I d

Re: [Vo]:New report by Parkhomov -- translation needed

I started it Peter On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Lewan Mats wrote: > LENR Forum has picked up a new report by Parkhomov. > > Anyone who can help with translation? > > > http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/1074-New-report-by-Alexander-Parkhomov/?postID=2512#post2512 > > > http://

Re: [Vo]:Electric Car Powered by Salt Water: 920 hp, 373 Miles/Tank

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:10 AM, David Roberson wrote: > Would the torque be split into 4 individual portions of 2000 ft-lbs since > there are 4 motors? That doesn't sound right. I don't know how you could measure it. These guys had trouble measuring the P85D measley 864 ft-lbs (yes split among

[Vo]:New report by Parkhomov -- translation needed

LENR Forum has picked up a new report by Parkhomov. Anyone who can help with translation? http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/1074-New-report-by-Alexander-Parkhomov/?postID=2512#post2512 http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Attachment/45-alexander-parkhomov2-pdf/ Mats --- Mats Le

Re: [Vo]:Electric Car Powered by Salt Water: 920 hp, 373 Miles/Tank

I don't know about 2.8s; but, here are some reactions to 3.1s in the new Tesla S P85D version in the "Insane" mode of operation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpaLgF1uLB8 (expletives NSFW, volume down)

RE: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

Hello Jones, Do you want to keep your lime sauce secret? Arnaud _ From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: mardi 27 janvier 2015 18:28 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design Jack Cole continues to improve his prior results, base

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Jack Cole improvement in LiOH design

On Tues 1/27/15 Axil said [snip] IMHO, The LENR reaction is produced by nano particles. Any chemical compound that when heated produce nano particles (dusty plasma) will be LENR active to some extent. [/snip] IMHO pyrophoricity is the stunted cousin to LENR –grain in a silo / ambient air reactin