Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
> We are analyzing net-energy out vs. net energy in, and chemical energy (as > potential) is part of the P-in in the calibration. > Jack Cole said, "I'd be convinced with 1.5 (say 135W out vs. 90 in)." That's power, not energy. He is using the term COP the same way HVAC people do. In any case, the potential chemical energy in this system is negligible, so we don't need to worry about it. - Jed
