Re: [Vo]:12 years from now

On 17/03/2017 2:08 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: . . . I see no reason why this will not happen sooner or later. Machines are far from being able to do this now, because they have brains roughly the size of a bird's brain. Birds do not understand human language. . . . So I believed until quite

Re: [Vo]:Palladium cold fusion as an energy source

Peter Gluck wrote: mre cells with death after (no) heat. > I do not know what this sentence means. Perhaps you are saying that Pd-D does not produce heat after death. That's incorrect. It does. There is no input power, so the COP is infinite. > probably not true for

Re: [Vo]:Palladium cold fusion as an energy source

mre cells with death after (no) heat. probably not true for Ti- very abundent element have worked with it. For CF remeber Scaramuzzi and our friend Chino has done a lot with Ti. Au is Au and has it s place in electromivvcs. So please do not mention PD based commercial energy sources. Re the

[Vo]:to create a better LENR culture (ii)

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-16-2017-creation-of-true-lenr.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:Palladium cold fusion as an energy source

Peter Gluck wrote: b) The heavy water gives D2 with a consume of energy good COP is > say 1.30 to be optimist . . . > There have been many cells with heat after death for long periods. That is a COP of infinity. Once the reaction is understood and controlled, I am

Re: [Vo]:12 years from now

I wrote: > , and application of the concepts to problem solving in a completely >> different domain. This still requires invention. >> > > Of course. However, neural networks can probably provide the basis for > this. > I mean they can provide the foundation. Like this: High level

Re: [Vo]:12 years from now

Bob Higgins wrote: I submit that using neural techniques to solve a problem is not AI. > Well, your brain is neural network of a similar nature. It is not just an analogy; the brain really is a neural network. Clearly, this architecture can give rise to intelligence.

Re: [Vo]:12 years from now

Bob Higgins wrote: Hmmm... Didn't your program insist that you include all of the words in the > sentences that are needed? :) re-read below. > No, it just flagged missing words. 120,000 words is enough to cover most vocabulary. The trick is to allow additional user

Re: [Vo]:12 years from now

AI and multilevel neural network are nothing new. In 88 when I was student , Yann Lecun was a reference in the domain... Older than Cold Fusion But the size of the network and the data were too small. Internet also overtake the priority on AI, Expert System, neural network, Natural language

Re: [Vo]:12 years from now

I submit that using neural techniques to solve a problem is not AI. Neural programming is a different solution type - more like comparing writing a program in a sequential language like C or Fortran compared to a data driven language like Labview that is fundamentally multi-threaded. If it were

Re: [Vo]:12 years from now

Neural network improvements to Google translate are described here. Look at the sample sentence. https://blog.google/products/translate/found-translation-more-accurate-fluent-sentences-google-translate/ See also: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/14/magazine/the-great-ai-awakening.html

Re: [Vo]:12 years from now

Bob Higgins wrote: That is the problem with the work of Futurists - many of the massive > changes in our lives comes from seminal inventions whose timing cannot be > predicted. Once that seminal invention is proved, progress from > engineering can be rapid, or can be

[Vo]:12 years from now

Hmmm... Didn't your program insist that you include all of the words in the sentences that are needed? :) re-read below. On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Frank Znidarsic wrote: > > Look at the picture. They predicted tug boat

Re: [Vo]:12 years from now

Frank Znidarsic wrote: Look at the picture. They predicted tug boat airplanes, painted floating > signs, boies as flight path markers. They knew that air travel was coming > but they could only extend the existing technology to explain it. That is a great picture. But the