i might also add that cane is a more effective source of sugar for
ethanol, and that a lot of the land owned by oil companies, used in
part for drilling, refinieries, ect, but large amounts of empty land
as well, is in the equator area, the best place to cheaply grow said
cane sugar. and ethanol
i would also wonder if large amounts of the various radiations that
make it through would cause heating deeper in the crust, for example
in underground water pockets and oil pockets. similar to a small
pocket of grease below the skin of that piece of chicken in the
microwave heating and
he claims to have a level garage floor. ive sent him an email asking
him to do and tape what someone else has already asked on the youtube
link, which is to run it both ways on the floor.
i havent looked at the other videos, just the wheel.
On 8/9/07, Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wait, what? is this email about Ed?
On 8/6/07, Horace Cochran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is CIALIS?
CIALIS is the only ED (Erectile Disfunction) tablet clinically proven to
work both
up to 36 hours and in as fast as 30 minutes. And because CIALIS has an
extended
period of
http://live.psu.edu/story/25129
University Park, Pa. -- In the hot springs of Yellowstone National
Park, a team of researchers has discovered a novel bacterium that
transforms light into chemical energy. The discovery of the
chlorophyll-producing bacterium, Candidatus Chloracidobacterium (Cab.)
Aye, his punishments according to that article indeed bring me to mind
of prometheus.
On 7/27/07, William Beaty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Jones Beene wrote:
Sad, but it does illustrate very dramatically the close connection
between inventive, or creative, genius and
I'm with Orion here. If i dont write, create, or dream up mad schemes
with regularity, i get a headache. Harlan Ellison said it best, when
he talks about writing becuase he must, becuause if he doesnt spew the
words out upon the page, the characters, the thoughts, they build up
inside of him
http://www.xkcd.com/c123.html
that is all i have to say on teh subject
On 7/20/07, Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 20, 2007, at 11:33 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
I made a drawing of the situation I was imagining:
http://web.ncf.ca/eo200/world-ferriswheel.html
This might work
on a more serious answer, if you are only taking the earths rotation
into account, then yes, i would think so. remember, becuase of the
tilt of teh earth, 90 degrees straight with teh ground would not be
the right orientation, me thinks.
How do you measure the force involved in a transfer of
Ya'll should check the rest of that comic out, ive fallen in love with
it. excellent math humor throughout.
On 7/20/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
The spelling mistake must have have been due to my lack of attention from
laughing so hard at the cartoon leaking
by definition, wouldnt increasing pressure change where the triple point is?
On 7/19/07, Zachary Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've wondered this, too. I was illumined to consider a paper on
sonomagnetism, a phenomena seen in the boundary layer of the oceanic
thermocline. The motion of
the expansion is due to crystal lattice forming, and many compounds
exhibit it in different ranges, just not many that are that simple.
the energy of compression, to a point, can actually go towards helping
teh phase change, as i recall, but during that phase change, temp isnt
going to change
it may never be possible. you assume they MUST have an actual
definate unchanging size. i would think that a natural consequence of
string theory would be that they couldn't, and would in fact pulsate
at different rates and amounts.
On 6/28/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW - For
echo
On 6/27/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Messages not getting through, or not coming back . . .
--
That which yields isn't always weak.
no. not with teh population we have, without a massive reduction in
quality of life, particularly for the top 10 percent, and THAT will
never happen without revolution.
On 6/21/07, Stiffler Scientific [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to gain insight to the Vort's view on the following
actually, most us copper is still coming from arizona.
On 6/21/07, StifflerScientific [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's science fiction, needless to say.
Yes I agree, we would be stupid to do this ourselves, yet what if we really
pis__d of China for example? Your not going to change gears over
:-)
-Original Message-
From: leaking pen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 6:32 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:US Lost
actually, most us copper is still coming from arizona.
On 6/21/07, StifflerScientific [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's science fiction, needless
that would be great michel, if photon pressure was what was being
discussed. I believe the discussion was gravity.
I agree with you David, even at twenty tons, i dont think there would
be much force. of course, remember that the larger the object being
pulled in that way, the more force
course correction occurs. as for how
it works to correct course, read up on gyroscopes, and gyroscope
navigation of submarines.
On 6/12/07, thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
leaking pen wrote:
On 6/12/07, thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I regards to the Spacestation's gyros, I posted
, thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I regards to the Spacestation's gyros, I posted, and
leaking pen replied:
what do you mean by stops? they are mounted on arms, was my
understanding. and try standing on a free spinning platform. spin a
bike tire while holding it so it orients vertically
what do you mean by stops? they are mounted on arms, was my
understanding. and try standing on a free spinning platform. spin a
bike tire while holding it so it orients vertically, grab it by the
center, and turn it 90 degrees. fun experiment.
On 6/11/07, thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm conflicted. Im usually all in on an attack on california, but
since this would help reduce one of my gripes with them (that the
winds bring all their air pollution our way where it gets caught by
hte mountains) I can't.
And Rick, states rights, eh?
On 6/8/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL
from the dumb drivers
they export
On 6/8/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
leaking pen wrote:
I'm conflicted. Im usually all in on an attack on california . . .
I had a low opinion of Gov. Schwarzenegger when he was elected, and I
am a democrat, but if I lived in California I would
That an experiment is reproducible is the cornerstone of the
scientific method. What, precisely, is your issue with the statement?
As has been stated before, that is the difference between scientist
and inventor. For an inventor, getting it to work now and again is
enough. for a scientist, it
so basically, his machine heated metal to the point of seperation of
water. what kind of energy input did he require, thats the question?
On 5/25/07, Esa Ruoho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm?
Video: Water into fuel?
Posted by: shane_digital [EMAIL PROTECTED] shane_digital
Fri May 25, 2007
i meant, how much actuall energy did he have to run across it? would
tell one whther or not the method would work for water fuel.
On 5/25/07, Esa Ruoho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
an oscillator capable of radio-wave-band frequency generation?
On 26/05/07, leaking pen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
wouldnt most safe to use paintable beta emitters have much less
energetic particles?
On 5/9/07, Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In reply to William Beaty's message of Wed, 9 May 2007 11:23:07 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Normally a large Tesla coil sends out fractal plasma streamers:
what would you use as a source for the seeds?
in addition, it would only throw the long sparks in the direction of
the motion of the seeds, yes no? so if you were using someting along
the lines of a particle beam gun to provide it, you could have a 10
foot sparker that shot 1000 foot arcs in
immediately goes to particle
accelerators.
and i see, that makes more sense. Sorry, my mind is on neutral today.
On 5/9/07, William Beaty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 9 May 2007, leaking pen wrote:
what would you use as a source for the seeds?
A 10MV tesla coil?
If Tesla succeeded, his
Ĉu vi parolas Esperanton?
On 5/7/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jones Beene wrote:
A few years ago, 95-99 % of the comments about LENR on Slashdot
would have ranged from negative to ROTFL, nowadays the skeptics are
... well... not yet crawling into holes, but shall we say - a bit
nope, number five, after mexico, argentina, colombia, and spain. not
neccesarily in that order.
almost 30 million spanish speakers in the us.
On 5/7/07, Jeff Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the US have the largest Spanish speaking population?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jones
Jones... what are you smoking, and can i get some?
On 4/26/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second Life is an ominous code-word of sorts in today's meme_world.
The meaning, however, depends on which clique one happens to be a part of-
presently... gamer-dude. Hey, they may call it
Of course, since that increase would increase the tides, and increase
the amount of land underwater both during high and low tide, your
comparison to the tides is completely irrelevant.
On 4/26/07, Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In reply to leaking pen's message of Wed, 25 Apr
Its not noise. its the normal cycle, and anything, even mm's is
variation on the normal cycle. In addition, we are talking about the
FUTURE, not right now. If the ice caps melt off, the sea level will
rise by meters. No one is saying that small amount the sea levels
have risen NOW is having a
except water is still reflective, more reflective than land, and large
amounts of land surface become water, yes?
On 4/25/07, Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In reply to leaking pen's message of Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:36:37 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
now, the mechanism is likely a global
no, its increased as a fraction by that much.
its increased by 22.5 percent. (measurement of increase is against
itself, as a fraction, not the whole)
On 4/24/07, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nitrogen 78.084%
Oxygen 20.946%
Argon 0.934%
Carbon dioxide 0.038%
Water vapor 1%
Other
now, the mechanism is likely a global warming, causing ice cap melting
and a change in albedo, causeing cooling, leading to ice age, thats
the generally accepted mechanism. Its a form of control and cycle.
Will the co2 going beyond what it gets too normally in that cycle
change things? and how
I couldnt be bothered to read youre whole post Kyle, becuase, frankly,
the whole thing disgusts me.
:D
just kidding.
and as a working class type person, I A. could care less about al gore
and his carbon credits, and B. could care less about the working class
as a whole having job and
this is actually the first vo post ive gotten in months that DIDNT
have the tag.
On 4/13/07, William Beaty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My fault. I think I got it this time.
(( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) )))
William J. Beaty
seriously, i use gmail. all the posts are marked vortex for me anyways!
On 4/13/07, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just delete the fucking thing, Bill. We lived forever without it.
Terry
(I'll give you fifty dollars (US) to restore the forum the way it was.)
PS (tell me how to pay
not in all of the us. a lot of empty ground is here in the southwest,
and algae will grow year round.
Also, large ponds that are heated... that waste heat goes straight
up, and will change wehather patterns.
On 4/2/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jones Beene wrote:
That is an
True, however, in terms of weather patterns, a small temperature over
a large area has more effect than large but concentrated. see el
nino.
On 4/2/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
leaking pen wrote:
Also, large ponds that are heated... that waste heat goes straight
up
there are many theories of everything. gut instinct, you know.
On 4/2/07, thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a serendipitous event last Thursday night. I met this Chem E. He
was talking about remediating the waste out of a nickle mine. I
mentioned ghost gold, he replied, ORMES. I
I for one never understood CORN being used. grow something with a
higher fruit yeild per acre, and sugar yeild per pound.
On 3/30/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recent negative comments on Vortex on this subject are short-sighted and
counter productive, despite the fact that ethanol
Theres direct cellulose conversion now? I'm behind on the technology,
obviously.
On 3/30/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
leaking pen wrote:
I for one never understood CORN being used. grow something with a
higher fruit yeild per acre, and sugar yeild per pound.
The decision
This may make wood alchohol production useful again, as you can now
break down both the lignin AND the cellulose.
On 3/30/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
leaking pen wrote:
Theres direct cellulose conversion now?
Yup. Only this year has the Rumpelstiltskin effect g come
Nice. theres also work now to put more traditional photosynthesis
into such beasties as yeast. But thats a lot more complex work.
On 3/27/07, Ron Wormus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is pretty cool!
http://www.technologyreview.com/Biotech/18436/
--
That which yields isn't always weak.
i prefer it. having that tag makes it easier to sort out by my
filters, and get the vo posts out of the junk folder.
On 3/21/07, John Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill: Let's get rid of this crazy Vo: adding macro. It does not work!
- Jed
Agreed, let's make this a 'me too!' thread.
My
Or, as my friend Brad would often say back in high school, Alex... PUT
THE SHOVEL DOWN!
and i object as well. the archive is not just for the purpose of
research into already discussed topics, but a source of info on the
evolution and use of the list. i rankle at the thought of ANY
censorship,
http://www.dailybeat.net/media/706/The-water-fueled-car.html
yet another example of shoddy reporting.
--
That which yields isn't always weak.
i cant get the video to play. how long does he discharge?
electrolytic caps have a discharge cycle, if its a quick flash, theres
still some juice in there.
On 2/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
On 2/17/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Time
this is not true. we have footage that shows the collapse of the
inside of the building for the first few seconds, and arial footage
showing it from the inside.
On 2/27/07, Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Palmer wrote:
I do not think they went down in freefall, after a
Umm, so, if there were no suicide pilots, who was flying?
On 2/21/07, John Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's my point exactly.
What I am saying has solid evidence to back it up, and you counter with
'Bush is a twit'.
Which while obviously true, no one is claiming he did any of the
not a skeptic, but, with the flow inside and out of the girder almost
even, that one looks more like it sheared off at an angle, and then
molten metal dripped over it.
and, as someone that uses the stuff, that is NOT what thermite
leftovers looks like.
On 2/20/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
oxide. the cooled metal there looks to me like melted
cooled aluminum, not iron. its too smooth, thin, and silvery.
On 2/20/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
leaking pen wrote:
not a skeptic, but, with the flow inside and out of the girder almost
even, that one looks more like it sheared
of course, the traces of thermite are , again, iron, aluminum, and the
oxides of each. ohh, and high heat.
i think its safe to say the site was FULL of said materials.
(besides, the sheared angle of the broken girder looks more like a
shaped charge explosive cutting through. which would have
also, 5k pounds of thermite would be required to bring it down on its
own. thats not the conspiracy theory. the theory is that the
thermite was used to melt the concrete and weaken teh steal, allowing
the rest of the natural damage from the plane to do it. that requires
substantially less
Indeed, i recall experts being brought on teh air as the towers were
burning stating they were designed to take this and more. my
understanding the engineers who designed and built the suckers were
shocked when they fell.
On 2/20/07, Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jed Rothwell
First off, not all in a radar defeating scheme is absorbed, a lot is
just scattered in various directions. secondly, most radar systems
are, at a difference, not much energy. it likely drops back down to
the unexcited stated, and emits a wave in some random direction. Might
i suggest studying
its all in teh execution.
On 2/7/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet another bio-fuel turns out be an environmental nightmare. See:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/business/worldbusiness/31biofuel.html?pagewanted=1ei=5070en=f15ff4f804f7d47aex=1170997200
QUOTES:
AMSTERDAM, Jan. 25
no, the way of phedre. heh.
On 2/1/07, Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
leaking pen wrote:
That which yields isn't always weak.
The way of Tao?
Harry
--
That which yields isn't always weak.
depends what you mean by electrical power. by my understanding,
wattage, the big way of measuring power, IS a change of electrical
current over time. i could be mistaken, my understanding of units of
electricity has always been iffy.
On 1/31/07, Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If
since part of the process of making ethanol is making corn syrup,
which converts a lot of the partially digested starches to sugars,
yes, actually, the whole process is likely more effecient to burn then
to eat. also, corn is already in just about everything we eat. we
grow more corn than we
push new techniques and higher efficiency
growing, so that will help. and immagine if all the money being spent
on drilling, pumping, and refining, werent? the good that could be
done with the numerical savings.
On 1/19/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
leaking pen wrote:
since part
That type of growing would be what i meant by more efficient. agreed.
a single multistory building with perfect climate and soil control
would be great. hell, run pigs and cattle on the top floor, and drop
fertilizer down.
On 1/19/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
leaking pen wrote
that they are the nations largest energy user? Wouldn't surprise me.
Shy of maybe some company that owns a lot of manufacturuing
facilities.
And most Walmart stores are indeed single story. And 24 hours a day,
and in places where weather patterns means not much sunlight. Just
sunlight isnt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wal-Mart
On 1/15/07, Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
leaking pen wrote:
that they are the nations largest energy user?
Yes, exactly!
Wouldn't surprise me.
Shy of maybe some company that owns a lot of manufacturuing
facilities.
Like Nucor
by definition, wouldnt that be a jet and not a rocket?
On 1/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has the merit of not altering the composition of the
atmosphere. The Isp can be improved with a nonmaterial
nozzle directing very hot exhaust. I think that a
directional leak for
Very interesting article.
http://www.forbes.com/business/2006/06/20/ethanol-fuel-biobutanol-cz_kad_0620ethanol.html
SAN FRANCISCO - DuPont and BP, riding the global wave of enthusiasm
for bio-based fuels, announced today that the two companies have
developed a new biofuel called biobutanol that
When one looks at what is going on at the bio level and has a summary
knowledge of the molecular level, if you are sane, you will not remain for
long.
very much agreed on that above statement. and im a christian myself,
though i do believe it quite possible life started by accidental
quote as it has been 50 some years from the time I read a Bible.
This is not the issue. WE, mortals have no real concept of where and how
we evolved, we add volumes of information, yet we ignore (?) well those
first atom were just there. :-)
-Original Message-
From: leaking pen [mailto
well, i like my pool. but then, in arizona, its a little more of a
neccessitya nd less a luxury
On 11/29/06, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/06, leaking pen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i take it youve never heard of watermellon snow?
http://waynesword.palomar.edu/plaug98.htm
.
(dealt with several this summer. massvie amounts of trees plus blowing
dust. kills the chlorine. for acid rain, try a salt water
chlorinator. adds some base, is more self stabilized. )
On 11/29/06, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/29/06, leaking pen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, i like
first off, i first heard the theory that earth spent time as an
iceball after the molten slagball before the dirt ball stage AGES ago.
its an accepted geologic theory that said icing over is what broke
down early rock into the first sand and dirt to provide a base for
life as the ice melted.
actually, the more elastic something is, the more it forms a ball
under its own gravity as well as surface tension. (ie, fluids, even
if small enough to not have gravity of their own, will still pull into
a sphere in zero g from surface tension. its the smallest volume to
surface area ratio,
PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: leaking pen
why WOULDNT have early aneaorbic life had oxygen as a waste
product?
pretty simple really -- they cannot live on the surface of ice.
The ice surface, then as now, is inhospitable to chlorophyl based
plants or algae and the ice
i take it youve never heard of watermellon snow?
http://waynesword.palomar.edu/plaug98.htm
On 11/28/06, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: leaking pen
why WOULDNT have early aneaorbic life had oxygen as a waste
product?
pretty simple really
well, i first heard about the stuff in my dec 1987 volume of national
geographics for kids, but hey
On 11/28/06, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: leaking pen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i take it youve never heard of watermellon snow?
http
bill put up videos? i missed this. anyone have a link?
On 11/2/06, Steven Krivit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to Bill Beaty's inspiring science videos on YouTube, I've decided to
start putting up some of my own content.
So when you're really bored and have nothing to do, here's the first
should the net ever truly become a war ground, it will return to the
original field of battle, as it was in the late 80s (this war is older
than you think) and it will compartmentalize. connections will e
through central nodes, like the bbs'es of old. there are already
people working on teh
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,221182,00.html
And, less than a kiloton. now, everyone ive heard is saying, wow,
thats just a baby nuke. aww, isnt that cute. they blew up a bomb
smaller than some CONVENTIAL bombs we have.
however, i recall back when the bunker buster nukes were being
rots the brain.. yeah, some say the same about comic books.
and
http://www.fas.org/faspir/2001/v54n1/weapons.htm
On 10/16/06, thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just heard Fox news say that the NK did detonate an atom bomb. Last
night Hal Lindsey mentioned the 550 ton yield. Since the
first off, how does this give evidence of an abiotic source? im
missing something.
second, even if true, its formed very very slowly. meaning we WILL run out.
On 9/12/06, Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Massive oil field found under Gulf
Reserves south of New Orleans could rival
well, all i did was write a suject in the subject field. are you
adding the [Vo}: yourself jones?
On 9/29/06, leaking pen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
testing subject.
--
That which yields isn't always weak.
--
That which yields isn't always weak.
ohh, youre using outlook express. thats your problem there. its a
pos. ive had mails sent but not sent, subject lines mangled and
dropped ALL the time when i was using it.
On 9/29/06, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: leaking pen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
well
if its based on difference in wave velocity, wouldnt stationary be
based on the surrounding radiation fields? and if so... now, uber
amateur here, im einsteinian, in that, im great with theory, weak with
mathematics, would two of these drives mounted at an angle to each
other, say, a 90 between
not all terrorist groups are muslim, and not all muslim groups are oil funded. drugs funds a lot of them as well, and some are funded through other, not oil businesses.
On 8/14/06, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:No one can win against a foe who is willing to die for
, and groups like his still exist.
there are still anti government riots and terror attacks and plots from many groups that are not muslim. assuming otherwise becuase a single convenient scapegoat makes you FEEL better is foolhardy.
On 8/14/06, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leaking pen wrote:not all
hes also stating that the average person ever sees dime one of the oil money. its the primary income for the RICH. not every one else there.
On 8/14/06, Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jed, you are proposing we treat the Moslem countries exactly how wetreated Germany after WWI.The plan was
lets also recall where osama bin laden got his training in guerilla warfare. yup, us, when we supported him in afghanistan to drive out russia.
On 8/14/06, Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In reply toJed Rothwell's message of Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:22:41-0400:Hi,[snip]What makes these
why not just upload the mpeg to youtube?
On 8/5/06, Steve Krivit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any Vorts skilled at converting mpg to swf? I've got a one-hour video from1989 of an internal EPRI meeting about CF that I'd love to drop on the net.
I could use either some guidance (I own Macromedia MX
same way you subscribed, but in reverse.
On 8/2/06, Anthony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Guys,How do I unsubscribe?Thanks!Anthony
-- That which yields isn't always weak.
generally not, no. most bearings are closed lube system now.
On 7/20/06, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting the Tesla Motors FAQ:The Tesla Roadster has no motor oil or oilfilters to change, no smog equipment to check, no air filters to
replace, no power steering fluids to refill.It
now, wait, it said a black box was the power source for an electric motor put into it. so the motor was replaced, not the regular motor. therefore, existing gearing goes out the window.
On 7/26/06, RC Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy Terry,The link refers to Tesla's 1931 Pierce -Arrow
god that is kim jong il, but close. news that there are greater than human beings? not smart move!
On 7/25/06, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/25/06, leaking pen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but seriously, what would it avail them?what would be the benefit to
admiting it publicly for them
hmm, regrowing jawbone, we already have. parts of teeth, we already have. but this is nice.
On 7/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone, apparently we now have the technology to regrow teeth, also to help regenerate receding gums or bone in the mouth.
i believe list manager would be bill beaty, and from what i can see, he doesnt always go through all the emails. you might wanna try him directly
On 6/8/06, Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure but then people who only watch their inbox like me will miss the posts, or they will check them
i was almost tempted to make a road trip of it until you said orem. i hit a cow on a road trip in 96 about a mile south of there, pulled into town, stayed the night at a hotel, informed the local authorities about it, and was arrested for not reporting the collision at the time (1 am...)
yeah,
Anyone seen this sucker?
http://cgi.ebay.com/THE-TESLA-SHIELD-radionics-psionics-rife-orgone-magick_W0QQitemZ9522360679QQcategoryZ1523QQcmdZViewItem
among other things, it incorporates the measurement of the cubit... isnt a cubit from your shoulder to your pointing index finger?
sounds great. now, where do we get a zero friction bearing?
On 5/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I posted this elsewhere; but, Vorts deserve a chance to poo-poo it.Thanks to Beene and Grimer for the inspiration.
Imagine a gyroscope with zero bearing friction and windage.It
301 - 400 of 574 matches
Mail list logo
