In reply to Jim Dickenson's message of Sun, 19 Jun 2022 02:54:54 +0900:
Hi,
[snip]
>Hi,
>
>This sounds like the most logical explanation or there were explicit
>instructions in his will to discontinue the web sites. Who knows?
>
>Interestingly, a Bearden DVD was sent to Dutchsinse and he posted
Hi,
This sounds like the most logical explanation or there were explicit
instructions in his will to discontinue the web sites. Who knows?
Interestingly, a Bearden DVD was sent to Dutchsinse and he posted it to
YouTube on 29 April 2022.
Here's the link:
Internet censorship does occur, dealt with by wiki at -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship
if conspiracy then openly admitted conspiracy
-- Original Message --
From: "Nicholas Palmer"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, 18 Jun, 22 At 02:06
Subject: Re: [V
The ISP, Worldnic.com, appears to be offline. It can't be reached. That
could be the problem.
Then again, net sleuths say that worldnic.com changed its name to netsol.com,
and it may now be part of networksolutions.com, which is still active.
https://www.networksolutions.com/
That is who hosts
Whois says the Domain is still active. It is paid for through 2024.
Probably, the ISP was not paid. As I said, the ISP will probably not delete
the content from its servers for a while. If someone contacts them, they
may help with reviving the site or transferring the data.
Here is the Whois
dered in regard to a potential radioactive battery patent.
>
>
>
> *From:* Nicholas Palmer
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 15, 2022 9:29 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone
>
>
>
> Chris Zell - what part of this in Jed's rep
I thought Frolov was long gone (may have confused him with S. Marinov.)
Like Naudin, he had MEG test reports, plus LOTS of other Russian crackpot
stuff which we in the USA have never encountered ...but it was all paper
publications. Testing of time machines. Poliakov antigravity. Kilowatt
ks are dead. Google frequently leads
searches far away from what was intended.
Since the discussion is about Bearden - he thought Arie De Geus was murdered in
regard to a potential radioactive battery patent.
From: Nicholas Palmer
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 9:29 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.
Andrew Meulenberg wrote:
> On the other hand, with uncontrolled population growth . . .
>
Population growth is not uncontrolled. On the contrary, it has largely
stopped. What I mean is, the only age cohort that is growing is people in
the Third World over age 40. Their numbers are increasing
Dear Jed,
Among the advantages of my system is the ability to provide a low-cost (yet
ecologically sound
and man-rated) mass-transfer system as a low-earth-orbit "waystation" that
can then provide
massive boosts to interplanetary transportation (e.g. to L1). The ability
to transfer people from
>
> https://energyfromthorium.com/2014/04/13/mythology-thorium-car-thorium-plasma-batteries/
>
>
>
> And here is a site denouncing the idea – loaded up with dead end links, as
> I said.
>
>
>
> *From:* Jed Rothwell
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 14, 2022 6:05 PM
> *T
I like it!
Oh wow!
Thank you!
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 9:03 PM H LV wrote:
>
> https://universalrejection.org/
>
> ;-)
> Harry
>
://energyfromthorium.com/2014/04/13/mythology-thorium-car-thorium-plasma-batteries/
And here is a site denouncing the idea - loaded up with dead end links, as I
said.
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 6:05 PM
To: Vortex
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone
Chris Zell
Esa Ruoho wrote:
Anyway I've mailed Anthony Craddock about cheniere + energyfromthevacuum.
> Eagerly waiting for a response.
> He should be the go-to-guy for paying for those domains.
>
It may be the domain has lapsed, or the ISP annual fee, or both. (In some
cases, the ISP also maintains the
Anyway I've mailed Anthony Craddock about cheniere + energyfromthevacuum.
Eagerly waiting for a response.
He should be the go-to-guy for paying for those domains.
ke 15. kesäk. 2022 klo 1.11 Jed Rothwell (jedrothw...@gmail.com) kirjoitti:
> I wrote:
>
>
>> The day the website bill comes due,
https://universalrejection.org/
;-)
Harry
I wrote:
> The day the website bill comes due, payment will be refused and the ISP
> told the card holder is deceased. Of course the site will be taken offline.
>
My credit card number once changed, and I forgot to update the ISP account.
On the day the payment came due, it did not go through.
Chris Zell wrote:
I would say that the ‘thorium battery’ on the internet has been thoroughly
> scrubbed and every link eliminated.
A Google search for "thorium battery" (in quotes) turns up more than a
thousand items. Without the quotes, more than a million. There is an
organization devoted to
: Monday, June 13, 2022 4:54 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone
information is being purged from internet as part of the political campaign to
delete fake news
-- Original Message --
From: "Esa Ruoho" mailto:esaru...@gmail.com>&
Robin wrote:
> >Not only that but seems like http://energyfromthevacuum.com is also
> gone. I wonder whats up now.
>
> No one paying the bill any more?
> If no one clicked on ads companies would stop paying for them. :)
>
I suppose he was paying for the website with his credit card, the way I
In reply to Esa Ruoho's message of Mon, 13 Jun 2022 19:17:42 +0300:
Hi,
[snip]
>Not only that but seems like http://energyfromthevacuum.com is also gone. I
>wonder whats up now.
No one paying the bill any more?
If no one clicked on ads companies would stop paying for them. :)
AI being used to remove fake news ->
How AI can Remove Fake News
https://bywire.news/articles/how-ai-can-remove-fake-news
-- Original Message --
From: "ROGER ANDERTON"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, 13 Jun, 22 At 21:54
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and chen
information is being purged from internet as part of the political
campaign to delete fake news
-- Original Message --
From: "Esa Ruoho"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, 13 Jun, 22 At 17:17
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone
Not only that but seems
Not only that but seems like http://energyfromthevacuum.com is also gone. I
wonder whats up now.
—
http://linkedin.com/in/esaruoho // http://twitter.com/esaruoho //
http://lackluster.bandcamp.com //
+358403703659 // http://www.lackluster.org //
http://facebook.com/LacklusterOfficial //
What is the meaning of Bearden's work - as you understand it? Was there
reliable evidence of an energy anomaly?
As I recall, there were several high quality attempted replications of MEG -
like that of Naudin which showed nothing more than a moderately efficient
transformer
Jones
David
https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/huntsville/name/thomas-bearden-obituary?id=32759244
Is there a web archive somewhere? Here is one saved in April 2022
https://web.archive.org/web/20220428030850/http://www.cheniere.org/
I began faxing Bearden in the 1990s. It took more than two decades before I
"Toward a LENR reference experiment" F. Metzler at the ARPA-E Low-Energy
Nuclear Reactions Workshop
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ec9OnfWvOjs
That is great stuff! Thanks. Your proposal is low earth orbit. I have heard
of others like this. The one linked to at BBC.com is for a very distant
space umbrella, at earth-sun L1. I don't understand how that would work. It
seems harder to set up. But the technical details and astronomy are over
Dear Jed,
You included this link, which I thought might have been referring to my
papers since some of the numbers agreed with mine.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20160425-how-a-giant-space-umbrella-could-stop-global-warming
* On closer look, I saw that the author did not suggest some of
I have discussed these topics here from time to time. I am preparing a talk
on them. I propose to stop global warming using cold fusion in two steps:
1. Stop emitting carbon dioxide by using cold fusion energy.
2. Remove excess carbon from the atmosphere by growing billions of
trees.
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 20 May 2022 13:22:05 + (UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
>Elon Musk has a strong and important opinion on using hydrogen as a way to
>store green (wind) energy
>"The most dumb thing"
>
Elon Musk has a strong and important opinion on using hydrogen as a way to
store green (wind) energy
"The most dumb thing"
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/05/12/tesla-ceo-elon-musk-dismisses-hydrogen-as-tool-for-energy-storage.html
However, Musk's starting assumptions could be wrong -
... if that is
Robin wrote:
> However, for
> >large scale storage, hydrogen may have an edge. I wouldn't know about
> that.
>
> I think it would, because the fuel/electrolysis cell itself is of fixed
> size, and hence cost, whereas the cost of
> hydrogen storage in a tank decreases per unit volume, with the
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 19 May 2022 17:39:02 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Generating hydrogen with wind turbines is a way to store the energy. That
>is needed because wind power does not come on demand. It may be that
>battery storage is now more economical than storing hydrogen.
Jones Beene wrote:
That is to say - if LENR is indeed real and robust - then it is very likely
> that splitting water using catalysis, on a large scale will uncover the
> extent of LENR utility as a base technology.
>
Why? What would be the point of splitting water if you have LENR? What
would
This mega-project - which is to split water on a massive scale using green
energy (wind) - makes almost no economic sense to many observers of alternative
energy ... especially not to Elon Musk - who thinks battery storage makes more
sense.
In reply to Drowning Trout's message of Sun, 15 May 2022 04:48:34 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I get the impression that the fast particle production rate is way to low to be
useful.
>David LaPoint's Primer Field Theory and applications for PrimerFusion.
>https://primerfusion.org/
>
>Thus far everything
David LaPoint's Primer Field Theory and applications for PrimerFusion.
https://primerfusion.org/
Thus far everything David LaPoint has done has been well documented and in
an open source manner, including materials/processes and CAD files for
anyone who wants to replicate. He's been pursuing this
Translated by people, not the Google computers. See:
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJlengjubian.pdf
Another of my papers translated:
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJreviewofthb.pdf
Implementation of Laser-Induced Anti-Stokes Fluorescence Power Cooling of
Ytterbium-Doped Silica Glass
published May 2021
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.1c00116
Abstract
Laser cooling of a solid is achieved when a coherent laser illuminates the
material, and the heat is extracted by
ent: *Monday, May 2, 2022 3:18 PM
*To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject: *Re: [Vo]:laser spectral linewidth is classical-physics
phenomenon
William
There extremely rarely is a two 511keV e+/e- decay signal seen. Its a
special case that can only happen in a contained case. Free e+/e-
annihilation us
, 2022 3:18 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:laser spectral linewidth is classical-physics phenomenon
William
There extremely rarely is a two 511keV e+/e- decay signal seen. Its a
special case that can only happen in a contained case. Free e+/e-
Laser cooling ... could this mechanism (arguably) have a connection to the
Holmlid effect?
Holmlid suggests that laser irradiation in his reactor is able to annihilate
protons, converting them to muons, Ostensibly this sounds more like heating
than cooling.
Unfortunately his company -
A video about laser cooling for the layman.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAEAZaXhD_Y
Harry
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 9:16 AM H LV wrote:
> Laser cooling is the cooling of atoms via spontaneous emission.
> In the video they say the laser radiation provides a damping force at a
> particular
modify QM system allowed energy
>states .
>
>
>Bob Cook
>
>From: Robin<mailto:mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au>
>Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 3:03 PM
>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:Laser Cooling -> Cooling with ra
arbitrary.
From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2022 1:48 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Laser Cooling -> Cooling with radiation
Robin--
Why does nuclear decay happen routinely?
The swap of potential energy of a QM system is not without restrictions
:03 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Laser Cooling -> Cooling with radiation
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Wed, 4 May 2022 16:49:08
+:
Hi Bob,
[snip]
>Radiation cooling is how the final process of LENR works.
>
>The first
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Wed, 4 May 2022 16:49:08
+:
Hi Bob,
[snip]
>Radiation cooling is how the final process of LENR works.
>
>The first step is to swap nuclear potential energy to kinetic spin phonic
>energy of a QM atom (including electronic structure) which is
is consistent with the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.
Bob Cook
From: H LV<mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 6:16 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: [Vo]:Laser Cooling -> Cooling with radiation
Laser cooling is the cooling of atoms
Laser cooling is the cooling of atoms via spontaneous emission.
In the video they say the laser radiation provides a damping force at a
particular frequency.
This is very close to how Count Rumford envisaged frigorific
radiation working.
Is it such a leap to imagine this kind of cooling is
dea of quantized space.
Bob Cook
From: William Beaty<mailto:bi...@eskimo.com>
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 9:01 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:laser spectral linewidth is classical-physics phenomenon
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022, H LV wrote:
>
&g
William
There extremely rarely is a two 511keV e+/e- decay signal seen. Its a
special case that can only happen in a contained case. Free e+/e-
annihilation usually is a 3 photon decay with <<0.01% being of 511keV...
The 511keV decay signal is an old illusion, that triggered a completely
Jurg,
You state "In SOP we show that the electron is a resonance of the proton."
Since I believe that the proton is composed of relativistic leptons and
leptons of EM fields (expressed as photons?), you have presented something
that will take me time to examine. I hope to do so - eventually.
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022, H LV wrote:
New research shows that laser spectral linewidth is classical-physics
phenomenon
https://phys.org/news/2020-07-laser-spectral-linewidth-classical-physics-ph
enomenon.html
VERY cool!
Perhaps this points to a new kind of physics which is a synthesis of
see below... vhttps://www.spintorsion.com
Please contact me if you want to email Neil D.
(( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) )))
William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb at amasci com http://amasci.com
A digestible introduction to Hegel's philosophy from the School of Life
channel.
7 minutes
"The German philosopher Hegel believed that strange and alien bits of
history have much to teach us. He believed story and civilisation do not
move in a straight line, so important ideas and attitudes get
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 9:20 AM H LV wrote:
>
> New research shows that laser spectral linewidth is classical-physics
> phenomenon
>
> https://phys.org/news/2020-07-laser-spectral-linewidth-classical-physics-phenomenon.html
> quote
> "As we have explained in this study, there is a simple,
New research shows that laser spectral linewidth is classical-physics
phenomenon
https://phys.org/news/2020-07-laser-spectral-linewidth-classical-physics-phenomenon.html
quote
"As we have explained in this study, there is a simple, easy-to-understand
derivation of the laser spectral linewidth, and
Time is absolute In quantum mechanics like it is in Newtonian mechanics.
However, since Newtonian mechanics does not allow for non-locality, it
could be that
the Newtonian sense of absolute time (N-Time) differs subtley from the
Quantum Mechanical sense of absolute time (Q-Time).
Perhaps the
- Original Message --
From: "Vibrator !"
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, 29 Apr, 22 At 23:43
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Stimulated emission and Pre-Quantum Physics
> So progression from 18th century theory of Boscovich to modern
physics
Fascinating, i was unaware of Boscovich's cont
> So progression from 18th century theory of Boscovich to modern physics
Fascinating, i was unaware of Boscovich's contributions, great
first-principle reasoning though..
There's still a good bit of unfinished business with certain 18th-century
breakthroughs that've languished, but don't get me
Andrew
Just one thing:
I assume that you mean the atom (including the bound electron) is
neutral. If you mean that the bound electron (in its interaction with
the nuclear Coulomb field) is uncharged EM field only, then this would
be one of our incompatible assumptions. However, I am
29 Apr, 22 At 19:38
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Stimulated emission and Pre-Quantum Physics
Did Boscovich subscribe to a wave or a particle view of light?
I wonder if electrons are "elementary points" and protons are "first
order particles" in Boscosvich's scheme.
https://youtu.be/w1vi0
in add: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/schr.html
IE. equivalent, not conflicting..
> here is an example
> Absorption and Stimulated Emission by a Thin Slab Obeying the Lorentz
> Oscillator Model
It's a quantitative formulation from classical first principles, sans
Schrodinger.. whereas the wave equation approximates the time
evolution of the wavefunction; you could describe a
ion from 18th century theory of Boscovich to modern physics
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "H LV"
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Friday, 29 Apr, 22 At 13:19
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Stimulated emission and Pre-Quantum Physics
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 20
hysics
-- Original Message --
From: "H LV"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, 29 Apr, 22 At 13:19
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Stimulated emission and Pre-Quantum Physics
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 5:44 PM Vibrator ! <mailto:mrvibrat...@gmail.com> > wrote:
I have been doing more
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 5:44 PM Vibrator ! wrote:
> > I have been doing more reading about the history of stimulated
> > emission. Einstein formally introduced a quantum version of the concept
> in
> > 1917.
> > Therefore you might think that it is only possible in a quantum
> theoretical
> >
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 3:15 PM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> I started to dig deeper the last few months and it became clear that most
> of the classic physics approaches are Kindergarten level physics based on
> wrong understanding of basic physics rules.
> On 25.04.2022 17:53, Andrew
> I have been doing more reading about the history of stimulated
> emission. Einstein formally introduced a quantum version of the concept in
> 1917.
> Therefore you might think that it is only possible in a quantum
theoretical
> context. However, subsequent mathematical work has shown that a form
Harry wrote:
> I had to look up those references. :-)
>
> Susquehanna Hat Co
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THZV5g1CNZM
> The Three Stooges - Slowly I Turned
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYP1OBZfFK0
>
>>
Clearly you have been too enveloped in your flaming youth to appreciate the
finer
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 2:42 AM William Beaty wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, H LV wrote:
>
> > I have been doing more reading about the history of stimulated
> > emission. Einstein formally introduced a quantum version of the concept
> in
> > 1917.
>
> "STIMULATED EMISSION!" Oh man don't even
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 2:42 AM William Beaty wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, H LV wrote:
>
> > I have been doing more reading about the history of stimulated
> > emission. Einstein formally introduced a quantum version of the concept
> in
> > 1917.
>
> "STIMULATED EMISSION!" Oh man don't even
Jones,
I looked quickly at the patent by Haisch and Moddel but could not find
anything about cooling. However, the authors of this paper,
ttps://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5893
experimentally investigated the claims of Haisch and Moddel in section
2.3.2. They tried to find alternative explanations for the
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, H LV wrote:
I have been doing more reading about the history of stimulated
emission. Einstein formally introduced a quantum version of the concept in
1917.
"STIMULATED EMISSION!" Oh man don't even get me started. (Too late!)
Saying the words Stimulated Emission, that's
The Anomalous Magnetization of Iron and Steel, B. Osgood Peirce 1912:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20022770?seq=2
The effects seem to pertain to high dv/dt impulses however.. not to
mention antique metallurgical samples (the high-Sv kind).
Modern electrical steels OTOH are designed to be
I have been doing more reading about the history of stimulated
emission. Einstein formally introduced a quantum version of the concept in
1917.
Therefore you might think that it is only possible in a quantum theoretical
context. However, subsequent mathematical work has shown that a form of
> Think of little magnets arranged end to end. NSNSNS etc. Not only do they
> attract but the field is cumulative, and as it
> get stronger it "convinces" other magnets to align the same way.
Variability of domain pinning strengths (individual domain wall
coercivities) is one cause of Sv per
Thanks, Jones...Danzik was what I was trying to remember, along with the
Earth Engine.
How do you do that with the neurons you have left?
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 4:33 PM Jones Beene wrote:
> Very similar to the Dennis Danzig "Earth Engine" scam of a few years back.
>
> ... or Steorn.
>
>
>
>
There is huge pent-up demand for cheap and carbon-free electrical power these
days, and gullible investors are constantly being fooled. PT Barnum
underestimated.
Holcomb Energy's technical claims may be unsophisticated to the point of being
laughable but they will find a few suckers. Holcomb
Photons are the universal = most basic form of energy. With photons you
can transport energy over any distance. So here the equivalence relation
E = mc^2 is obvious. Same for the Pointing power vector for a radiation
field.
But if you write E = mc^2 and e.g. m is 4-He then the equation simply
In reply to Vibrator !'s message of Mon, 25 Apr 2022 23:16:20 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>The guy's claiming that induced B in 'electrical steel' climbs to 500% of
>applied H.
Think of little magnets arranged end to end. NSNSNS etc. Not only do they
attract but the field is cumulative, and as it
get
The guy's claiming that induced B in 'electrical steel' climbs to 500% of
applied H.
He's basically claiming runaway self-induction, apparently as an inherent
property of this material.
So what to make of it? Applying an H field induces a B field, giving their
combined field density M, or net
Here's some interesting and colorful background on the principal
"inventor" Dr Roberet Ray Holcomb:
https://casetext.com/case/in-re-holcomb-health-care-services
On 4/25/2022 2:47 PM, Robin wrote:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 25 Apr 2022 20:32:24 + (UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
Very
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 25 Apr 2022 22:17:01 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Classic misunderstanding ... the bomb energy comes from E=dmc^2 .
>
>
>J.W.
That was assumed anyway. I.e. the change in mass is where the energy comes
from. Are you saying that E=mc^2 is not the
total energy of
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 25 Apr 2022 20:32:24 + (UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
> Very similar to the Dennis Danzig "Earth Engine" scam of a few years back.
>
>... or Steorn.
>
>
He appears to confuse magnetic field strength with energy. However, that said,
perhaps it works in a similar
I think I have posted this before, but Einstein was also able to derive E=mc^2
without recourse to his theory of special relativity. Max Born presented
this alternate derivation in his book Einstein's Theory of Relativity. Here
is the proof:
Harry - perhaps you should have a look at the work and patents of Haisch and
Moddel on the Lamb shift mechanism using hydrogen or helium in Casimir
cavities.
The dynamical Casimir effect can be either positive or negative and Lamb shift
photons would be cold. IIRC there was a measured
I was thinking about LASERS (Light amplification by Stimulated Emission of
Radiation) and it occurred to me that the notion of cooling radiation is
already present in quantum theory, but it is disguised as "stimulated
emission" in order to respect the mid 19th century doctrine that cooling
Very similar to the Dennis Danzig "Earth Engine" scam of a few years back.
... or Steorn.
Terry Blanton wrote:
So does anyone know about these folks? They make me think of Steorn but with
credentials.
https://holcombenergysystems.com/about-us/the-team/
THE TECHNOLOGY
The HES utilizes
Classic misunderstanding ... the bomb energy comes from E=dmc^2 .
J.W.
On 25.04.2022 21:23, Robin wrote:
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:25:49 +0200:
Hi Jürg,
If E=mc^2 is wrong, then perhaps you should write the major nuclear powers, and
explain to them why
Andrew,
I started to dig deeper the last few months and it became clear that
most of the classic physics approaches are Kindergarten level physics
based on wrong understanding of basic physics rules.
On 25.04.2022 17:53, Andrew Meulenberg wrote:
Jurg,
Thank you for the comments. It helps
Reminds me of "The Electric Universe Theory" including the *Safire Project*
.
There is a small earth to air current. Very weak but measurable. There were
attempts to gather this current with balloons covered with spikes, hundreds of
feet up. So, I guess the earth is negative.
From: H LV
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2022 3:02 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo
So does anyone know about these folks? They make me think of Steorn but
with credentials.
https://holcombenergysystems.com/about-us/the-team/
THE TECHNOLOGY
The HES utilizes the natural energy produced by the electron spin in the
iron atom, converting it into usable electricity. Through a total
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:25:49 +0200:
Hi Jürg,
If E=mc^2 is wrong, then perhaps you should write the major nuclear powers, and
explain to them why their bombs don't
work. ;)
>Andrew,
>
>
>I could give you a very long list. First problem: The Dirac equation
Using something similar to this method?
>
>
>
> *From:* H LV
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 23, 2022 12:33 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:A simpler test
>
>
>
> Update...
>
> I haven't done any experiments yet, but I have refined my thinkin
Jurg,
Thank you for the comments. It helps us to understand the reasons behind
rejection of the concept of deep-orbit electrons.
Comments below
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 9:25 AM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> I could give you a very long list. First problem: *The Dirac equation
> itself
Andrew,
I could give you a very long list. First problem: The Dirac equation
itself is only working for fields and never for mass. The inclusion of
the relativistic mass simply is an error made by a mathematician with no
clue of physics.
The Einstein equation (E=mc^2) has been guessed
1101 - 1200 of 104665 matches
Mail list logo
