Is that Oriani paper the draft that Oriani testifies the US editors of
"Nature" rejected, despite it passing peer Nature's own peer review?
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Foks0904 . wrote:
> Well Mr. Franks bailed preemptively. For anyone else whose interested:
>
> Oriani, Excess Heat, Fusio
James,
Yes it is. It was then published in Fusion Technology, which I believe
George Miley was editing at the time.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:40 PM, James Bowery wrote:
> Is that Oriani paper the draft that Oriani testifies the US editors of
> "Nature" rejected, despite it passing peer Nature'
This image shows the RAR Energia device moving at its maximum
rotational velocity:
http://rarenergia.com.br/imagem51a.JPG
(I'm not sneering, I'm snarking!)
- Brad
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Foks0904 . wrote:
> Well Mr. Franks bailed preemptively. For anyone else whose interested:
>
> Orian
Well Mr. Franks bailed preemptively. For anyone else whose interested:
Oriani, Excess Heat, Fusion Technology:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/OrianiRAcalorimetr.pdf
Morrison-Fleischman debate about Fleischman's published calorimetry
in Physics Letters: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmanrep
Please don't unsubscribe Mr. Franks. Your tact is unparalleled and would
surely be missed.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:40 AM, John Franks wrote:
>
>> What is "wrong with the data" Mr. Franks? Specifically the Excess Heat
>> data. What artifacts are present in the calorimetry? Point out to me the
>
>
> What is "wrong with the data" Mr. Franks? Specifically the Excess Heat
> data. What artifacts are present in the calorimetry? Point out to me the
> peer reviewed critiques of researchers' calorimetry that have stood the
> test of time.
>
Wow! Was it you claiming one group had 100% repeatabil
* It doesn't get past first base as there is no data and when there is
claims of data, that data is flawed. There is no theory base too to make
the real scientific community *suspect* that anything will come out of it.*
What is "wrong with the data" Mr. Franks? Specifically the Excess Heat
data. W
What has hope got to do with science?
Your assertion below is incorrect. We know that physical diseases have a
biochemical basis, so we are correct to apply the scientific method and
*suspect* that greater knowledge and/or a cure will result. This is why
people fund the science of cancer research.
It was, and is the hope that we will find cures for cancer that provides
the funds for many people such as myself to do the research that I am
doing. In a number of cases there was no scientific basis for the hope
when the research was started, but it funded the scientific research,
and scienc
>>> Foks0904 : Obviously I hope it performs as advertised.
What has hope got to do with science? Do you believe in mind matter effects
and magical thinking? Nature (excuse the pun) just does what it bloody well
wants to.
CF *is* like RAR where grown ups keep telling them to read the proper
litera
Obviously I hope it performs as advertised. So I do "care" in that
respect. My point is it is novel and inspired enough to be interesting and
worth paying attention to no matter what.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Foks0904 . wro
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Foks0904 . wrote:
> Truly bizarre, and I could care less as to its usefulness.
>
". . . could *not* care less . . ."
It will make a brilliant centre peice for a museum looking at all the
attempts, both successful and unsucessful, to find alternative energy
sources. I guess the problem is that we dont yet know which of the two
sections of the museum which should put this (and many other current
projects) into
Like this 4 cylinder Stirling which I was hoping that Santa would deliver
http://cdn.homemodelenginemachinist.com/images/1/5/2/7/8/dsc-0004-2.jpg
Running on Nickel-hydrogen of course .
From: Foks0904
And the P-F cell perhaps?
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Yes. "If". And by "Art
And the P-F cell perhaps?
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Foks0904 . wrote:
>
> Yes. "If". And by "Art" I don't necessarily mean lacking in utility. I
>> mean its a damn fine piece of craftsmanship whatever the hell it can or
>> cannot do.
>>
>
> I agree. It does look wo
Foks0904 . wrote:
Yes. "If". And by "Art" I don't necessarily mean lacking in utility. I mean
> its a damn fine piece of craftsmanship whatever the hell it can or cannot
> do.
>
I agree. It does look wonderful. Retro and steampunk, too.
Many experimental machines and scientific instruments have
Yes. "If". And by "Art" I don't necessarily mean lacking in utility. I mean
its a damn fine piece of craftsmanship whatever the hell it can or cannot
do.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:32 PM, James Bowery wrote:
> Well, actually, if they are demonstrating an energy technology as
> radically differe
Well, actually, if they are demonstrating an energy technology as radically
different as they claim, I'd think twice about comparing its value as "art".
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Foks0904 . wrote:
> Just the sheer imagination and brazenness that went into this design
> brings a smile to
Just the sheer imagination and brazenness that went into this design brings
a smile to my face. Truly bizarre, and I could care less as to its
usefulness. It is an inspiring piece of art regardless of its technological
utility. Brings a smile to my face.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:56 PM, a.ashfiel
RAR continues to post new photos at their site http://rarenergia.com.br/
I also see they claim to have posted five newspaper adverts in the
Gilman IL area saying:
The generator is driven by a mechanical system that is fed exclusively
from the Earth's gravity.
It will be the first equipment w
20 matches
Mail list logo
