Jed sez:
> Here is an interesting treatise on being wrong:
> http://www.amazon.com/Being-Wrong-Adventures-Margin-Error/dp/0061176044
It seems to be human nature to want to be right about what it is that
we chose to pontificate on. Unfortunately, arriving at certain
opinions seems to be one of hum
Am 23.09.2011 23:29, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Peter Heckert mailto:peter.heck...@arcor.de>>
wrote:
However, experts skilled in the art have said that
Galantini's methods are correct.
Did Galantini know whats inside the tower?
Did these experts know whats inside?
Horace Heffner wrote:
> People who "tell it like it is" look sophomoric, in my opinion. People who
>> are dismissive run the risk of being themselves dismissed. It is better to
>> leave some room to retreat in case it turns out you are wrong.
>>
>>
> What is so bad about being wrong. It is the
Peter Heckert wrote:
>
However, experts skilled in the art have said that Galantini's methods are
>>> correct.
>>>
>>
> Did Galantini know whats inside the tower?
> Did these experts know whats inside?
>
They say they looked inside it. They saw nothing unexpected or unusual.
> Did the expe
Hi Jed,
On Sep 22, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
However, experts skilled in the art have said that Galantini's
methods are correct.
Did Galantini know whats inside the tower?
Did these experts know whats inside?
Did the experts get true and complete detail informations? Did they u
On Sep 22, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
Some questions for you and other self-appointed experts here:
This remark seems to have some emotional content.
Darn right it does. I am annoyed.
DO you know of any requirement for anyone here on vortex-l to be
a
Horace Heffner wrote:
Some questions for you and other self-appointed experts here:
This remark seems to have some emotional content.
Darn right it does. I am annoyed.
DO you know of any requirement for anyone here on vortex-l to be an
expert to comment?
Not to comment. I have no obje
Who knows enough about sound velocity in various quality steam?
- Original Message -
From: Jouni Valkonen
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: About measurement of steam with Galantini probe
Mattia, you can also measure the
dard
> is to condensate the steam.
> > From: Jouni Valkonen
> > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:45 PM
> > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> > Subject: Re: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe
>
> >
> > Peter, in order to measure the enthalpy you
am
quality/ecc from a RH reading. I challenge you. Nobody do it. ISO standard
is to condensate the steam.
> From: Jouni Valkonen
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:45 PM
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe
>
> Peter, in
On Sep 22, 2011, at 6:24 AM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
- Original Nachricht
Von: Jed Rothwell
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 22.09.2011 15:53
Betreff: Re: Aw: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe
peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Now what happens
On Sep 22, 2011, at 5:53 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Now what happens, when an inventor without deep knowledge and
experience constructs a steam device, makes it unaccessible and
then lets unexperienced scientist measure the steam?
Most scientists expect that devi
wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Nachricht
> Von: Jed Rothwell
> An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Datum: 22.09.2011 15:53
> Betreff: Re: Aw: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe
>
>> peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
>>
>> > Now what happens, w
- Original Nachricht
Von: Jed Rothwell
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 22.09.2011 15:53
Betreff: Re: Aw: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe
> peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
>
> > Now what happens, when an inventor without deep knowledge an
peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Now what happens, when an inventor without deep knowledge and experience
constructs a steam device, makes it unaccessible and then lets unexperienced
scientist measure the steam?
Most scientists expect that devices that they use are properly constructed and
work
- Original Nachricht
Von: Mattia Rizzi
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 22.09.2011 14:32
Betreff: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe
> Jed Rothwell wrote: » In the first test, Galantini used a Delta Ohm
> monitor to measure the relative humidity
Jed Rothwell wrote: » In the first test, Galantini used a Delta Ohm
monitor to measure the relative humidity of the steam. This is a model
HD37AB1347 IAQ with a high temperature HP474AC SICRAM sensor. See:
http://www.deltaohm.com/ver2010/uk/st_airQ.php?str=HD37AB1347
The brochure and the experts
17 matches
Mail list logo
