Another typo, I'm afraid. The "hot-cat-data" file was an addendum to the
validation report Rossi presented in Zurich -- the test was done on July
16, 2012. Both these files are in my Scribd account where I have uploaded
various documents .
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> *
From: Patrick Ellul
Rossi's numbers in a spreadsheet:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/109919735/Rossi-Validation
There is a data file on this linked page called "hot-cat-data":
http://www.scribd.com/doc/105325449/Hot-Cat-Data
The assumption seems to be that this is the data in questi
Rossi's numbers in a spreadsheet:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/109919735/Rossi-Validation
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 10:50 AM, David Roberson wrote:
>
> Eric, you mention that LENR devices tend to shut down by themselves in the
>> HAD mode. Rossi
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 10:50 AM, David Roberson wrote:
Eric, you mention that LENR devices tend to shut down by themselves in the
> HAD mode. Rossi has insisted that his units only reach this state if they
> run uncontrolled and self destruct by melting. I would consider this type
> of operati
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 10:50 AM, David Roberson wrote:
Eric, you mention that LENR devices tend to shut down by themselves in the
> HAD mode. Rossi has insisted that his units only reach this state if they
> run uncontrolled and self destruct by melting. I would consider this type
> of operati
would consider this type of
operation a defect that needs to be corrected.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sat, Oct 13, 2012 1:05 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Another Rossi error?
On Oct 13, 2012, at 9:00, David Roberson wrote:
I can only guess that he
On Oct 13, 2012, at 9:00, David Roberson wrote:
> I can only guess that he allowed this operation to continue until stopped
> with some form of heat extraction to defeat the process and allow the unit to
> cool down.
Assuming what Andrea Rossi is saying is basically true, there may or may not
all for another few
months? A little taste of poor quality food is better than starvation.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sat, Oct 13, 2012 12:20 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Another Rossi error?
Well, it’s too badthat Physics Today is giving abit of credence
Well, it's too bad that Physics Today is giving a bit of credence to the
field at the same time this Rossi crap comes out .
It could not be called 'crap,' and would be easier to believe if Rossi had
included data and did not include this warning at the top of the document
(ironically labeled a
It looks as though they have taken the temperature of the device of 1050 C and
subtracted the room temperature of 25 C before converting into Kelvin at
1298.15, which is inserted into the radiation equation. The non linearity of
the temperature effect upon the radiation makes this not accurate.
, 2012 11:43 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Another Rossi error?
From:David Roberson
It looks as though he used the conversion factor of .0001 toconvert the square
centimeters to square meters which is a valid calculation. I wonder why he does
not include the area of the end caps in hiscalculation
The comments in the referenced link address these issues and more. There
is also this link:
http://www.physicstoday.org/daily_edition/science_and_the_media/media_outlets_consider_cold_fusion_and_low-energy_nuclear_reactions
Which is a summary of LENR in the news.
I am pretty sure the decimal in the first number should be a comma. Rossi
is mixing up numbering conventions.
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* David Roberson
>
> ** **
>
> It looks as though he used the conversion factor of .0001 to convert
From: David Roberson
It looks as though he used the conversion factor of .0001 to convert the
square centimeters to square meters which is a valid calculation. I wonder
why he does not include the area of the end caps in his calculation? Do you
suppose he wants to be conservative on th
to interpret as usual for Rossi, but the numbers look pretty
good as a start.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sat, Oct 13, 2012 10:43 am
Subject: [Vo]:Another Rossi error?
Amidst all the hoopla over Rossi's recent hot-cat claims, and the
Amidst all the hoopla over Rossi's recent hot-cat claims, and the first
retraction - and the notable lack calibration data, or lack of real data -
did Rossi also make a devastating math error?
Last night, in the comments - it looks like Ahern suggests that Rossi's own
calculations are off by four
16 matches
Mail list logo
