[Vo]:Calorimetry versus Thermal imaging

friends, this is just an idea I want to put into discussion. The background is, that although LENR maybe proven, there is a gap between theory and experiment. Apart from the experiment-setup itself, we have the diagnostic tools. Which are a) in-process: a1) nuclear particle detection a2) He_x

Re: [Vo]:Calorimetry versus Thermal imaging

Von: Guenter Wildgruber gwildgru...@ymail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com vortex-l@eskimo.com Gesendet: 11:52 Freitag, 6.April 2012 Betreff: [Vo]:Calorimetry versus Thermal imaging This is a typical example: Surface Analysis of hydrogen loaded nickel alloys

Re: [Vo]:Calorimetry versus Thermal imaging

Von: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com An: Guenter Wildgruber gwildgru...@ymail.com Gesendet: 20:27 Freitag, 6.April 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Calorimetry versus Thermal imaging Thermal imaging is more *intuitive*  than thermocouples and caloritmetric calculations, and that makes it more

Re: [Vo]:Calorimetry versus Thermal imaging

Guenter, Your idea of Thermal Imaging is worthwhile, but is severly limited by available technologies. For instance, I could not find a reasonably priced and easilty available Sight Glass pipe fitting that is rated for 1000 psi and 1000K; otherwise, I would immediately implement a camera

Re: [Vo]:Calorimetry versus Thermal imaging

At 04:52 AM 4/6/2012, Guenter Wildgruber wrote: friends, this is just an idea I want to put into discussion. The background is, that although LENR maybe proven, there is a gap between theory and experiment. Apart from the experiment-setup itself, we have the diagnostic tools. Which are a)