On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:40 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
This is the sort of thing that makes me think that the primary energy
release
mode is via fast particles, e.g. protons, alphas, or even heavier nuclei
(from a
clean fission reaction). These don't usually produce much in the way of
I wrote:
What are ways, known or hypothesized, to preferentially get fast particles?
Sorry about this question -- this is sort of the big one, I suppose.
There's catalysis of helium by way of fractional hydrogen, for example.
You may have even already answered this question.
Eric
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sat, 14 Jul 2012 23:43:52 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:40 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
This is the sort of thing that makes me think that the primary energy
release
mode is via fast particles, e.g. protons, alphas, or even heavier nuclei
At 12:27 PM 7/11/2012, David Roberson wrote:
Abd, do you have information concerning the relative magnitude of
the power input drop relative to the nominal value in its
absence? Are we speaking of a large percentage change?
The change is significant. I saw this in certain data, and
At 03:00 PM 7/11/2012, Rich Murray wrote:
maybe, the cathode becomes coated with many micro and nano bubbles,
raising its surface electrical resistance -- then micro and nano
explosions on the surface, which quickly becomes much more rugged with
tractal geometry, expose the metal directly to the
At 02:44 PM 7/11/2012, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Could this be an indication of the onset of ballistic conduction in some
micro-/nano-channels?
I first want to know what this is before going much into possible
explanations!
The proposed explanation here seems overly complex to me,
At 03:07 PM 7/11/2012, Axil Axil wrote:
Could this be an indication of the establishment of entangled
electron states resulting in mass increase related to heavy
electrons? Recently, heavy electrons have been shown to be an
indicator of an onset of superconductive conditions.
Axil
Gee,
At 03:19 PM 7/11/2012, Nigel Dyer wrote:
I would agree that looking at the physical state of the
water/bubbles at the surface of the electrode is a good idea. There
was some work done many years ago on the sound of various chemical
reactions. The sound of jelly setting was particularly odd
At 10:29 PM 7/11/2012, David Roberson wrote:
A thought occurred to me concerning the drop in equivalent
resistance that this thread covers. It would be quite important if
the drop were due to a reverse voltage generated by the LENR
mechanism that could be improved in such a manner as to act
Here is a way to test my guess.
One indicator that the alpha particles come from fusion is a lack of light
nuclear transmutation products; products with an atomic number less than
the cathode material.
From the begining, the assumption has always been that helium is a product
of deuterium
An alternative to fusion is the lowering of the coulomb barrier which
increases the probability of alpha particle emissions from the heavy element
nucleus.
I must not understand your point here. If the barrier is lowered then it would
seem that an alpha particle would exhibit less of a
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 11 Jul 2012 20:59:54 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Ed Storms has estimated that to generate 1 watt of power, a typical output,
by way of helium production, you would need on the order of 10^12 reactions
per second. (I think this is probably for a 1 cm^3 volume, but
The coulomb barrier is symmetric. It is just as hard to get a proton out of
the nucleus as it is to get a proton into a it.
In 1928, George Gamow http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Gamow had
solved the theory of the alpha decay via tunneling. The alpha particle is
trapped in a potential well
At 03:49 PM 7/12/2012, Axil Axil wrote:
Here is a way to test my guess.
One indicator that the alpha particles come from fusion is a lack of
light nuclear transmutation products; products with an atomic number
less than the cathode material.
The indicator that helium is coming from fusion
*The indicator that helium is coming from fusion is that it is correlated
to anomalous heat, in the FPHE, at approximately the deuterium fusion ratio.
*
This assumption must be tested.
If the precise composition of the reaction ash from the reaction is studied
in detail, assumptions about the
(this was also posted to the private list for CMNS researchers.)
It's come to my attention that some researchers have frequently
observed a sudden drop in resistance of electrolytic cells associated
with the onset of XP bursts. I'm seeking to document this.
In experiments where there is
Abd, do you have information concerning the relative magnitude of the power
input drop relative to the nominal value in its absence? Are we speaking of a
large percentage change?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Could this be an indication of the onset of ballistic conduction in some
micro-/nano-channels?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
(this was also posted to the private list for CMNS researchers.)
It's come to my attention that some researchers have frequently
observed a sudden drop in resistance of
maybe, the cathode becomes coated with many micro and nano bubbles,
raising its surface electrical resistance -- then micro and nano
explosions on the surface, which quickly becomes much more rugged with
tractal geometry, expose the metal directly to the electrolyte, with
reduced average
Could this be an indication of the establishment of entangled electron
states resulting in mass increase related to heavy electrons? Recently,
heavy electrons have been shown to be an indicator of an onset of
superconductive conditions.
Axil
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:44 PM,
I would agree that looking at the physical state of the water/bubbles at
the surface of the electrode is a good idea. There was some work done
many years ago on the sound of various chemical reactions. The sound
of jelly setting was particularly odd (another situation where water is
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
It's come to my attention that some researchers have frequently observed a
sudden drop in resistance of electrolytic cells associated with the onset
of XP bursts. I'm seeking to document this.
I skimmed over
I wrote:
What I like about strong magnetic fields is that they bring gamma
quenching just a little bit more into the realm of possibility. They
could, for instance, lead to synchrotron radiation, although synchrotron
radiation might imply a 511 keV peak.
I omitted the important point
Eric, I see that you are looking into gamma quenching as a method to control
the dangerous gammas which are expected to be released by the reactions. Do
you think that the process is virtually perfect such that there are essentially
no gammas escaping to the outside world? I might accept
You wrote:
Eric, I see that you are looking into gamma quenching as a method to
control the dangerous gammas which are expected to be released by the
reactions.
Yes, unfortunately. It took me a little while to move away from neutron
production, so there's still hope that I'll give up on
I wrote:
In my ignorance I am not able to get from p+p or p+D to tritium or
helium-3, a decay product of tritium, without electron capture or something
even more mysterious.
I should clarify that what I'm hoping to find is an aneutronic reaction to
get to tritium or helium-3. If you allow
Eric Walker wrote:
Yes, unfortunately. It took me a little while to move away from neutron
production, so there's still hope that I'll give up on gamma quenching as well
at some point.
I think that we should give consideration to every possible concept that arises
until Rossi or some of the
Eric, I think that tritium naturally undergoes beta decay to form helium-3.
This process does not release any neutrons but it has a very slow decay rate
which might not demonstrate much helium-3 during our time frame.
Helium-4 is a strange acting element. It has an incredible amount of
28 matches
Mail list logo
