Re: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

2019-03-03 Thread Brian Ahern
Magnetism is largely I’ll understood The molecular orbitals supporting ferromagnetism are in dispute Sent from my iPhone On Mar 3, 2019, at 5:28 PM, "bobcook39...@hotmail.com" mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>> wrote: Andrew— You point out: “Point charge is

RE: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

2019-03-03 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com
Andrew— You point out: “Point charge is only a mathematical convenience,” What you say begs the question: Is there any physical significance to a charge by it self? The next question of course is: Is the illusion of charge really a localized dynamic magnetic field? It seems there should be

Re: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

2019-03-02 Thread Andrew Meulenberg
Dear Bob, Point charge is only a mathematical convenience, valid for isotropic sources or conductors when measured beyond any of their charge distribution. We are taught in freshman physics how to treat the static fields inside a charge distribution. That said, the problem gets more difficult

RE: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

2019-03-02 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com
I think the relativistic considerations eliminate the reality of a “point charge” assumption for electrons, particularly in the nuclear dimensional zones and smaller. Andrew—If this is correct you might identify the range (distance) over which your theory applies and, otherwise, clarify the

Re: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

2019-03-01 Thread Andrew Meulenberg
Dear Jones, Thanks for asking about our work. We have published this since JCMNS -Vol 24. J-L Paillet, Andrew Meulenberg, "Deepening Questions about Electron Deep Orbits of the Hydrogen Atom," J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci. *26* (2017) 54–68,

RE: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

2019-02-28 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com
Robin and Jones— IMHO the use of the term pycno hydrogen refered to a dense lattice of hydrogen –a metallic like crystalline lattice. Arata etal were not referring to a dense hydrogen atom as Mills and Holmlid are. As Robin suggested, I wound not compare Holmlid and Arata theory. Bob Cook

Re: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

2019-02-28 Thread Jones Beene
mix...@bigpond.com wrote: > Did you mean Takahashi rather than Arata? Hi Robin, Arata and Zhang had a version of dense hydrogen called "pycno" which means "dense"... http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ArataYdevelopmena.pdf Supposedly it would load into Pd at an atomic ratio of 3:1 compared

Re: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

2019-02-28 Thread mixent
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:59:42 + (UTC): Hi, [snip] > Question for Andrew. The citation that comes up on Google for your most > recent paper seems to > be:http://coldfusioncommunity.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/230_JCMNS-Vol24.pdf > >Excellent, but it does

Re: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

2019-02-28 Thread Jones Beene
Question for Andrew. The citation that comes up on Google for your most recent paper seems to be:http://coldfusioncommunity.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/230_JCMNS-Vol24.pdf Excellent, but it does not try to integrate similar concepts which are floating around, such as those of Holmlid,

RE: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

2019-02-27 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com
Two obvious questions avoided by the paper: 1. What is the theory—a reference would normally be included. 1. What is the “/Coating layer/ on the cathode satisfying some special requirements;?” This information is likely a University/researcher trade secret or part of a patent being

Re: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

2019-02-26 Thread Andrew Meulenberg
I have rejected the common concept of "heavy" electrons as applicable to LENR by simple reasoning. The definition of electron and hole effective mass in a semiconductor refers to the acceleration in that material from a force applied, m =* F/a*). This mass increase does not apply *within* a

RE: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

2019-02-25 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com
Several leading questions about “heavy electrons”: * Do heavy electrons fit in the standard Model? * If so, what is their relativistic KE? * If relativistic. What keeps them from leaving the semi conductor surface? Bob Cook From: Jones Beene Sent:

Re: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

2019-02-25 Thread Jones Beene
Interesting. Alexandrov's concept of providing "heavy electrons" as apparently are seen in semiconductor technology - in order to catalyze the fusion of hydrogen and deuterium sounds a lot like muon catalyzed fusion. In fact the muon is sometimes referred to as a "heavy electron" since it is

Re: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

2019-02-25 Thread Jed Rothwell
See: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Alexandrovheavyelect.pdf

[Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

2019-02-25 Thread Jed Rothwell
See: http://canadiancor.com/proposal-for-the-development-of-an-lenr-reactor/ QUOTE Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor Introduction: Canadian researcher, Dr. Dimiter Alexandrov, Lakehead University, in his semiconductor research laboratory, performed successful replicable LENR