[Vo]:Laser toner controversy

2007-12-04 Thread David Jonsson
I thought that laser toner was dangerous chemically since they are collected and disposed separately. i investigated and found that this was not the case http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toner The only health risk associated with it is due to its ability to generate static electricity. Putting it in

Re: [Vo]:Laser toner controversy

2007-12-04 Thread leaking pen
same as any fine dust, rub it against itself. one of those bagless vacuums would work perfect. i created 3 inch sparks to my legs with one of those just using reglular house dust from the static buildup. On Dec 4, 2007 1:51 AM, David Jonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought that laser toner

Re: [Vo]:Laser toner controversy

2007-12-04 Thread David Jonsson
Isn't laser toner specifically chosen for having high or well known static characteristics? What is he ability to have static electricity? Has it anything to do about paraelectricity? David On Dec 4, 2007 2:35 PM, leaking pen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: same as any fine dust, rub it against

Re: [Vo]:Laser toner controversy

2007-12-04 Thread Terry Blanton
http://home.howstuffworks.com/photocopier1.htm On Dec 4, 2007 9:46 AM, David Jonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Isn't laser toner specifically chosen for having high or well known static characteristics? What is he ability to have static electricity? Has it anything to do about paraelectricity?

Re: [Vo]:Laser toner controversy

2007-12-04 Thread Harry Veeder
There is concern about toner dust. It is extremely fine and can lodge deep in the lungs. Harry On 4/12/2007 3:51 AM, David Jonsson wrote: I thought that laser toner was dangerous chemically since they are collected and disposed separately. i investigated and found that this was not the case

Re: [Vo]:Laser toner controversy

2007-12-04 Thread leaking pen
yes. the laser on the paper causes static, the toner than sticks to that static, so that toner only sticks to areas where the laser has excited. the heater element then mlets the toner to the page. the large amount of static generated is one of the reasons a laser printer running overtime

Re: [Vo]:Laser toner controversy

2007-12-04 Thread David Jonsson
A friend of mine said the same thing but I wonder if the real hazard might be electrical. Do you know how these health investigations were performed? Dust has been available to humans for millennia without problem so I doubt that this is the real hazard. It could be the end hazard (ontologically)

RE: [Vo]:Laser toner controversy -

2007-12-04 Thread Rick Monteverde
Per the Nick Palmer experiments, I wonder if toner carts get lighter when you shake them up? - R.

Re: [Vo]:Laser toner controversy

2007-12-04 Thread leaking pen
its not the toners that are collected, its the toner containers. thats becuase they have valuable parts, like the drum, inside them, and it costs about a buck to refill it with toner as opposed to manufacturing a new one. its a blend of plastic resins. not something i want in my lungs. On

Re: [Vo]:Laser toner controversy

2007-12-04 Thread thomas malloy
David Jonsson wrote: Isn't laser toner specifically chosen for having high or well known static characteristics? What is he ability to have static electricity? Has it anything to do about paraelectricity? David On Dec 4, 2007 2:35 PM, leaking pen [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]