Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

I wrote: I have not yet looked closely at Holmlid's results, but I don't write them > off. I'm keeping a distinction in my mind between his experimental > observations and his theoretical speculations. > I have now had a chance to look more closely at Leif Holmlid's 2013 paper, "Direct

RE: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

I suppose a real nuclear physicist will correct me on a lot of my assumptions. Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 04:16:37 -0400 Subject: Re: [Vo]:MMDD Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration From: janap...@gmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com I believe that what you imagine is what is happening in one o

Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Stephen Cooke wrote: If any was produced we would need to balance this against those the energy > required for pion production. > The amount of energy needed to create a free pion is large; the rest mass for a pion is ~ 135 MeV.

Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

I believe that what you imagine is what is happening in one of the many cases involving SPP extreme magnetic projections and entanglement,

Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

In case it is interesting I have found a couple of interesting papers on pionic deuterium. http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C070910/PDF/290.pdf

Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

- > From: stephen_coo...@hotmail.com > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: RE: [Vo]:MMDD Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration > Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:16:09 +0200 > > > 'The amount of energy needed to create a free pion is large; the rest mass > for a pion is ~ 135 MeV' &g

Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Stephen Cooke wrote: Very true this is also true for the muon which has a rest mass for a pion > is ~ 106 MeV. This is one of the reasons I don't think muons are involved either. Another reason -- if muons were being generated, you'd

RE: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

say he could well have another explanation. From: eric.wal...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:47:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [Vo]:MMDD Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration To: vortex-l@eskimo.com On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

with > sufficient energy to interact with another Deuterium nucleus to form a > diproton that decays to 2 high energy protons, or it decays to a muon of > characteristic energy that is later detected. > > I suppose a real nuclear physicist will correct me on a lot of my > assu

RE: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

Oct 2015 08:47:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [Vo]:MMDD Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration To: vortex-l@eskimo.com On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: If any was produced we would need to balance this against those the energy required fo

Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

This is definitely a crazy train of thought on my part but it's got me wondering: Bearing in mind Holmlids detection of muons and possibility they come from decay of positive or negative pions along with the fact that they are generated in ultra dense deuterium. Is It possible that the nuclei

RE: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

The lifetime of pions is a factor of 100 times shorter than the muon, which is itself short. How pions can be detected at all, with so short a lifetime is a question worth asking. There is a good possibility that they are inferred – from finding muons, which can be detected.

Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

I guess there is a chance that they saw X-ray spectra from Pionic Deuterium as well as inferring from muons of specific energy. It will be interesting to see what he says on Thursday, I hope someone can ask these kind of questions. Sent from my iPad > On 19 okt. 2015, at 18:18, Jones Beene

RE: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

m. So I hope someone with more knowledge can clarify and knock some holes in what i just said. Thanks Stephen From: jone...@pacbell.net To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:MMDD Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:15:30 -0700 RE: [Vo]:MMDD Mu

RE: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

From: Stephen Cooke * Could there be characteristic photon emission from transitions in muon shell levels similar to those from electrons and at what frequencies these occur. Could these be observed experimentally? If characteristic radiation can be seen from muon energy level transitions

[Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

MMPD Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration The work of Leif Holmlid and others has opened up the possibility of understanding what appears to be a new kind of nuclear reaction - a limited type of chain reaction which is not fusion nor fission. The result of this reaction is the complete

Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

Jones, While this is interesting speculation, I have come to assess probabilities of of heretofore unknown reactions based inversely on binding energy. If we look at molecular binding energy, it is less than atomic binding. Nuclear binding energy is greater than atomic binding. Sub-nucleon

RE: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

Correction * * In this reaction of relatively cold deuterons, gamma emission cannot proceed, and fusion to deuterium is suppressed in favor of complete disintegration of protons and neutrons into quarks. . should read: "gamma emission cannot proceed, and fusion of deuterium to helium

RE: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

Bob, Good analysis. Subnuclear binding energy is significantly higher than nuclear binding energy, in general. As we know, it takes many terawatts to show evidence of the Higgs boson. After that, we must bootstrap power into energy to make this happen. Fortunately – terawatt pulses are

Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > According to the HRM, the process develops in > three steps: a photon (in this case, the 24 MeV internalized photon) knocks > a quark from the nucleon; the struck quark rescatters off a quark from > another nucleon; then

Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

It takes many TeV to show the Higgs - not TeraWatts. A 1.0 TeV particle only has 1.6e-7 joules of kinetic energy, but that energy is in a single particle and can create a TeV event in a collision. A TW laser will not really help. The individual laser photons are only eV level, and a TW laser