Jones Beene wrote:
> Defkalion has been burdened with poor management, too few qualified
> scientists . . .
I do not know how many scientists they have.
> - and a flawed business plan. Dumber than dumb. Their business
> plan envisioned charging extremely high up-front license fees for every
Good old dark matter/energy. You know it is working when your device
malfunctions.
Stewart
Darkmattersalot.com
On Wednesday, October 24, 2012, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Jones Beene
> >
> wrote:
>
> > True, even Celani is not yet
> > independently replicated, at l
It's just a "DETACHMENT event". Let's hope them to find something
interresting after the ongoing calibration.
> -Original Message-
> From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: mercredi 24 octobre 2012 20:27
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sub
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> True, even Celani is not yet
> independently replicated, at least not on the record, but insiders think the
> first replication will be published soon.
It looks like HUG might have experienced a "LENR event".
http://www.quantumheat.org/inde
-Original Message-
From: Robert Lynn
I can only surmise that Defkalion prevented publication, which would
contradict their earlier statements about allowing independent
testers
to publish. Hiding poor results?
Yes - I think they are hiding results, but "poor" in
Robert Lynn wrote:
So if they funded the trip then why didn't they publish any results?
>
Because they are under NDAs.
- Jed
So if they funded the trip then why didn't they publish any results?
After all they are a charity that is trying to promote and expand LENR
research - and publishing good results would surely help this.
I can only surmise that Defkalion prevented publication, which would
contradict their earlier s
On 2012-10-22 14:14, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
As a side note, it appears that the entity which funded Michael A.
Nelson's traveling expenses was not the "Free Energy Foundation", but
rather the "New Energy Foundation". This correction comes from Mark
Gibbs of Forbes. See [1] and f
A theory that might explain how this excess high energy electron charge
forms in response to a spark in a pressurized gas is as follows:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_oscillation
Plasma oscillations, also known as "Langmuir waves" (after Irving
Langmuir), are rapid oscillations of the ele
I was just looking over the documentation and I saw something that does not
make sense. In the step 1 triggering process it is claimed that the separation
of diatomic hydrogen into individual atoms is an endothermic process. There is
a discussion where it is said that this is done electrically
“John Hadjichristos explained that
the amount of time the electron of a polarized H atom is
close enough to the nucleus to appear to be a virtual
neutron (stage 2) is 1 x 10-17 seconds.”
This conjecture is not accurate. The excited hydrogen atom would have a
quantum number in the neighborhood of
Nothing we had not surmised.
Professionally I'm devastated to see that...
Technically very interesting. not much secret hopefully. Most was in their
ICCF17 article. Happy to see Potassium confirmed...
Human factor comments are very interesting. tell more than the measures.
Too bad it is "fruit of the poisonous tree". no path
On 2012-10-22 14:14, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
The document (I suggest saving a copy in case it gets deleted):
http://ecatnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Summary-of-Visit-to-Defkalion.pdf
Compare the document above with this one:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/government/NASA/20110922NASA-Nelson
Old stuff, I think it is proof that this technology is very
different from Rossi's.
Peter
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Akira Shirakawa
wrote:
> On 2012-10-22 14:24, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
>> Every page in this document is marked "Extremely
>> Confidential." Evidently that does not mean much at
On 2012-10-22 14:24, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Every page in this document is marked "Extremely
Confidential." Evidently that does not mean much at Defkalion.
I don't get all this confidentiality either.
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2012-10-22 14:14, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
The document (I suggest saving a copy in case it gets deleted):
http://ecatnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Summary-of-Visit-to-Defkalion.pdf
By the way, I think it's important to point out that this document is
dated March 2012, while the other t
Every page in this document is marked "Extremely Confidential." Evidently
that does not mean much at Defkalion.
- Jed
Atomic Hydrogen with potassium as a catalyst? Doesn't this sound an
awful lot like Mill's work in the 90s?
Craig
On 10/22/2012 08:14 AM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
It appears that the pdf documents with redacted names wasn't the only
one which sort of "leaked" from early uploads pu
Hello group,
It appears that the pdf documents with redacted names wasn't the only
one which sort of "leaked" from early uploads put on the official
Defkalion GT forums and hastily replaced with different ones. Apparently
there was another one, formatted as a presentation and signed by Micheal
20 matches
Mail list logo
