RE: [Vo]:New Holmlid paper on Research Gate

Robin— I thought that went without saying, the pure energy transformation of particle-antiparticle reactions. Bob Cook From: mix...@bigpond.com Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 1:08:30 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:New Holmlid paper on

Re: [Vo]:New Holmlid paper on Research Gate

The prior comment from Robin actually reminds me of a recent thread here about a possible "backdoor" way to get the Holmlid effect. This alternative route would not violate conservation of baryon number, in fact. The hypothetical route would involve nuclear charge flipping. Here is the thread.

Re: [Vo]:New Holmlid paper on Research Gate

t a liquid state > > -- > *From:* JonesBeene > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 24, 2019 12:04 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* [Vo]:New Holmlid paper on Research Gate > > > > > > h

Re: [Vo]:New Holmlid paper on Research Gate

Robin - No apparent violation there since the baryon number on both sides of the reaction is 0  p+ + p–   →  γ (gamma ray) + γ (gamma ray) IOW when the proton and antiproton come into contact, they annihilate into two high-energy photons.  mix...@bigpond.com wrote: Perhaps I misundersta

RE: [Vo]:New Holmlid paper on Research Gate

“simpler!” than the SLAC group’s arguments IMHO. Bob Cook From: JonesBeene Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 11:42:28 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:New Holmlid paper on Research Gate Nah. In fact, there are many violations of baryon number conservation

Re: [Vo]:New Holmlid paper on Research Gate

In reply to JonesBeene's message of Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:42:28 -0700: Hi, Perhaps I misunderstand conservation of Baryon number, but isn't proton : anti-proton annihilation an obvious violation? > >Nah. In fact, there are many violations of baryon number conservation at high >local temperatures

RE: [Vo]:New Holmlid paper on Research Gate

–thus deceit and secrecy Is warranted. With a somewhat cynical attitude, Bob Cook From: JonesBeene Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 11:42:28 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:New Holmlid paper on Research Gate Nah. In fact, there are many violations

RE: [Vo]:New Holmlid paper on Research Gate

Nah. In fact, there are many violations of baryon number conservation at high local temperatures in the Standard Model… Here is a decent paper on the subject of baryon conservation law violations from people who see it almost every day and incidentally have LLNL connections. http://www.slac.

Re: [Vo]:New Holmlid paper on Research Gate

What is H2N(0) ? There is no superfluidity without a liquid state From: JonesBeene Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 12:04 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:New Holmlid paper on Research Gate https://www.researchgate.net/publication

Re: [Vo]:New Holmlid paper on Research Gate

[image: B = \frac{1}{3}\left(n_\text{q} - n_\bar{\text{q}}\right),] where *n*q is the number of quarks . Should read [image: image.png] On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 1:20 PM Axil Axil wrote: > In particle physics

Re: [Vo]:New Holmlid paper on Research Gate

In particle physics , the *baryon number* is a strictly conserved additive quantum number of a system. It is defined as {\displaystyle B={\frac {

[Vo]:New Holmlid paper on Research Gate

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331968180_Ultradense_protium_p0_and_deuterium_D0_and_their_relation_to_ordinary_Rydberg_matter_a_review There is a clue here about why the output in muons has been difficult for others to duplicate. It turns out that the active material must be in the fo