-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker
If I have understood what I have read, the decay they're seeing is a signal
being picked up by GM #1 when a lead barrier is interposed between it and
the active material. So for the signal to be due to a fusion reaction,
would this reaction need to be
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 5 Nov 2012 06:45:00 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Here is a Radon map.
http://denr.sd.gov/des/aq/images/Radonmap.gif
Given that Radon is a decay product of Uranium, this is probably also a map of
Uranium deposits in the US.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
Not exactly - a massive source of radon in the Eastern USA is shale and low
grade coal - where there is sometimes 50 ppm of uranium which cannot be
mined, economically ... but because deposits can be hundreds of feet in
thickness over thousands of square miles - substantial radon seeps out - far
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Here is a Radon map.
http://denr.sd.gov/des/aq/images/Radonmap.gif
If a testing lab is in the high radon potential zones, such as say -
Northern New Mexico, efforts must be made to exclude radon counts.
It looks like my
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sat, 3 Nov 2012 16:15:10 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
20Ne + d - 18F + ?
17O + p - 18F + ?
40Ar + d - 41Ar + p
68Zn + d - 69Zn + p
70Ge + d - 68Ga + ?
16O + Hydrino molecule = 18Ne which decays in seconds to 18F, which has a half
life of 109 min. Alternatively
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 1:36 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
16O + Hydrino molecule = 18Ne which decays in seconds to 18F, which has a
half
life of 109 min.
I forgot about the possibility of a more elaborate cascade. That probably
opens up all kinds of possibilities.
Alternatively 16O + D =
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sun, 4 Nov 2012 15:01:00 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Up to now I've only heard about decay half-lives. Is there another name
for the fusion half-life or a page that describes it?
You probably won't find it. The terminology usually used for fusion is reaction
rate
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sun, 4 Nov 2012 15:01:00 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
If I have understood what I have read, the decay they're seeing is a signal
being picked up by GM #1 when a lead barrier is interposed between it and
the active material. So for the signal to be due to a fusion
Two weeks ago we talked about a note that Ed Storms and Brian Scanlan were
passing around [1]. They are conducting an experiment using GM counters
and have identified two signals for unknown species that are decaying. The
half-lives are calculated to be 58 minutes and 109 minutes, respectively,
Eric,
From Wikipedia, the isotope of fluorine 17 has a half life of 64.49s. This
value is close to the 58sfrom the report of Ed Storms and Brian Scanlan.
Can we also consider also the reaction 16O + p - 17F as a possibilities?
Arnaud
Reference: Self-organized atomic nanowires of noble metals on Ge(001):
Atomic structure and electronic properties
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
We found that when several materials are subjected to conditions expected
and found to produce voids, and then exposed to H2, a source of radiation
results that is consistent with the radiation reported by previous
From: Eric Walker
In the paper, Storms and Scanlan describe the Geiger-Muller
activity of unknown species that appear to have half-lives of 58 and 109
minutes, respectively; they wonder whether they're actually the same
species, observed under
I uploaded a version of this paper with some revisions and corrections.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEnatureofen.pdf
- Jed
At 11:26 AM 10/23/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I uploaded a version of this
paper with some revisions and corrections.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEnatureofen.pdf
I had to read it several times to figure out the relationship between
GM#1 and GM#2.
Let me summarize my current understanding
Ed Storms is stuck on fusion in his thinking about radiation coming from
hydrogen concerning its nuclear effects on a cracked metal lattice.
This unsupported preconception is undercutting an objective examination of
what nuclear transmutation processes are happening in the lattice.
The hydrogen
From: Alan J Fletcher
GM#1 and GM#2 are no longer detecting radiation from the Specimen, but are
detecting the decay of K40 in the Mica window.
So the the discovery is that the radiation from the specimen is doing
something to K40 -- which decays with a half-life of 109 minutes.
Does
Alan, if you look at the photograph, you see GM#1 on the apparatus,
where it is clearly shown in the diagram (Fig. 5), and GM#2 is
hanging by a wire off to the right , as clearly stated under the
photograph.
GM#2 never detects radiation from the sample but can detect radiation
from GM#1
Storms, E. and B. Scanlan, *Nature of energetic radiation emitted from a
metal exposed to H2*. J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci., 2012(submitted).
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEnatureofen.pdf
Ed published this description of the paper at CMNS:
I'm making a prepublication copy of a new paper available for your
information and comment - sort of a universal peer review.(
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEnatureofen.pdf) It has been submitted
to JCMNS. Unfortunately it is too big for
On 2012-10-22 20:44, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Storms, E. and B. Scanlan, /Nature of energetic radiation emitted from a
metal exposed to H2/. J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci., 2012(submitted).
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEnatureofen.pdf
I don't think I have the expertise needed to discuss this
In the document, the word fusion should be replaced with the word “fission”
due to coulomb barrier lowering as a direct consequence of Anderson
localization of electrons in and near the lattice discontinuities in the
metal.
Scale up od the effect can be done using electrostatic amplification
“Now we only need a foolproof, methodology to reliably and cheaply create
these NAE on common metals (such as Ni, Cu). Maybe Francesco Celani has
one?”
Rossi first invented this when he used tubules to cover nickel
micro-powder.
Cheers:Axil
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Akira Shirakawa
There are a couple of troubling things about this paper that stand out on a
first read. I hate to sound critical, since in the extreme case (to be
explained) this could be a very important paper.
Like Forsley before, Ed Storms finds radiation, but unlike Forsley there is
little acknowledgement of
Correction: I sent the preceding out too quickly since on review I see the
EDAX of the mica, which somehow shows it is over half carbon when in nature,
mica has none. Possibly mica laminated to a film of polycarbonate. It does
show 5% potassium.
Anyway - this statement says it all - the good
, October 22, 2012 5:08 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:New paper by Storms and Scanlan
There are a couple of troubling things about this paper that stand out on a
first read. I hate to sound critical, since in the extreme case (to be
explained) this could be a very important
would be very surprised if this is the case, but who knows.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Oct 22, 2012 3:08 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New paper by Storms and Scanlan
Ed published this description of the paper
27 matches
Mail list logo
