RE: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-29 Thread Craig Haynie
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 20:35 -0800, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote: Wouldn't that be a hoot if it was good ol Dr. Mills. I hear BLP had to cut back on space heating to save money, and their technology is a little behind schedule, and over budget! :-) -Mark What is their technology? Are

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-29 Thread Joshua Cude
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote: Well, you see, the problem is that there are many possible errors in their determinations and they did not do what was need to rule them out. No, there are not. This is your

[Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Alan J Fletcher
Andrea Rossi November 28th, 2011 at 6:48 PM November 28th, 2011 at 6:48 PM Dear Herb Gills: Today we sold in the USA a 1 MW plant which will go to a normal Customer. This installation will be visitable by the qualified public. We wait to have completed the contractual procedure through the

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
Way to go Rossi. Congratulations. Bit sad they beat us but then we need Ac kWs. AG On 11/29/2011 11:03 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote: Andrea Rossi November 28th, 2011 at 6:48 PM

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Harry Veeder
visitable by the qualified public who qualifies? harry On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote: Andrea Rossi November 28th, 2011 at 6:48 PM November 28th, 2011 at 6:48 PM Dear Herb Gills: Today we sold in the USA a 1 MW plant which will go to a normal Customer.

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Jed Rothwell
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: visitable by the qualified public who qualifies? My guess is: people who feel at home in equipment rooms with 1 MW reactors. That would not include me. Seriously, as I have often said, engineers and HVAC professionals are who we should depend upon to

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Mary Yugo
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: visitable by the qualified public who qualifies? My guess is: people who feel at home in equipment rooms with 1 MW reactors. That would not include me. My guess is nobody

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
My guess is you are very wrong. AG On 11/29/2011 1:05 PM, Mary Yugo wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: visitable by the

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Terry Blanton
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: My guess is: people who feel at home in equipment rooms with 1 MW reactors. That would not include me. Seriously, as I have often said, engineers and HVAC professionals are who we should depend upon to evaluate this

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote: My guess is: people who feel at home in equipment rooms with 1 MW reactors. That would not include me. My guess is nobody who can test it properly and my second guess is that it won't ever happen anyway. Everyone who has tested it so far has been

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Mary Yugo
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote: My guess is: people who feel at home in equipment rooms with 1 MW reactors. That would not include me. My guess is nobody who can test it properly and my second guess is that

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote: Well, you see, the problem is that there are many possible errors in their determinations and they did not do what was need to rule them out. No, there are not. This is your imagination. If they had said there is no heat you would insist this was a

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
This guy was interested in buying a E-Cat: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=32#comment-118944 http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=32#comment-118944 Wonder if he is Rossi’s newest customer? AG On 11/29/2011 11:03 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote: Andrea Rossi

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Jed Rothwell
Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote: This guy was interested in buying a E-Cat: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-** physics.com/?p=510cpage=32#**comment-118944http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=32#comment-118944 http://www.journal-of-**nuclear-physics.com/?p=510**

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
NE is like 25% of the US. As you have said, sometime Rossi does mislead. The guy sure seemed interested to get involved at an early stage of the development and I would suggest, from researching Charlie Sutherland, that he would be a good and knowledgeable early adopter. Just what Rossi and

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Jed Rothwell
Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote: NE is like 25% of the US. But North Carolina is definitely not part of it. This company does not appear to have facilities anywhere else. One source says: Sutherland Products Inc in Mayodan, NC is a private company categorized under Cleaning or

RE: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
Wouldn't that be a hoot if it was good ol Dr. Mills. I hear BLP had to cut back on space heating to save money, and their technology is a little behind schedule, and over budget! :-) -Mark

RE: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
Wait a minute... Hey, AussieGuy, is Aussie your first or last name? :-) Can't remember if you've identified yourself to the Vort Collective or not!! Come on, what's good for the goose is good for the gander! Or vice-a-versa... -Mark

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Mary Yugo
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote: It is true that the tests witnessed by EK were somewhat sloppy. They could have used better instrumentation. However, EK are good scientists and they understand that no experiment

Re: [Vo]:Next customer -- public, NE USA

2011-11-28 Thread Mary Yugo
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote: Wait a minute... Hey, AussieGuy, is Aussie your first or last name? :-) Can't remember if you've identified yourself to the Vort Collective or not!! Come on, what's good for the goose is good for the