In reply to Alain Sepeda's message of Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:54:31 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
thus the mass is simply caused by all the lattice/wave around, slowing the
electrons when it tries to move...
Personally, I can't see this contributing to it's ability to form a neutron,
however it might solve a
Hi,
I'm looking at W/L theory.
To be honest, the first comments I've read make me think about crackpot
language, but it seems to be simple jargon.
I resume my opinion, asking for better explanation and eventual critics.
note that I have basic level in QP (and classic physic) because of basic
That heavy mass electron in WL refers to its self-energy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-energy
Not to the mass in relation to the conduction band:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_mass_(solid-state_physics)
2012/1/6 Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
Hi,
I'm looking at W/L
thanks,
difference is subtle, and on wikipedia they even say that self-energy
include effective mass...
it is the same mass as the some heavy particle have because of Higgs Boson,
or the one nucleus have different from their nucleons members. right?
2012/1/6 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
The difference is not subtle, but it's the fault WL papers are not clear
because they are dealing simultaneously with different subjects where the
term mass has different meanings. I only realized that when I read a
comment by another critic.
But I didn't understand your question...
2012/1/6
my question was to check if the self energy is a mass weighting the energy
of the interaction of the particle
with the around, like we find that nucleons are more heavy inside a nucleus
than alone, free...
like also Z/W bosons get heavy because they interact with Higgs bosons...
so unlike
6 matches
Mail list logo
