RE: [Vo]:RE: f13C or faux13C

rtex-l<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: f13C or faux13C Correction therefore decisive should read therefore destructive On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>> wrote: C12 is a boson and as such is LENR c

Re: [Vo]:RE: f13C or faux13C

Correction therefore decisive should read therefore destructive On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > C12 is a boson and as such is LENR capable. C13 is a fermion and therefore > decisive to the formation of a bose condensate of atoms. It is reasonable >

Re: [Vo]:RE: f13C or faux13C

C12 is a boson and as such is LENR capable. C13 is a fermion and therefore decisive to the formation of a bose condensate of atoms. It is reasonable to expect that C12 will aid in the production of ultra dense hydrogen. The same boson characteristic will support the use of lithium that has been

RE: [Vo]:RE: f13C or faux13C

Here is a detail which came up earlier – the embedded proton concept works best in the context of the Mills’ “hydrino hydride” where the proton and two very tight electrons combine into a stable ion which replaces carbon’s innermost orbital electron. The innermost orbital of carbon would need

[Vo]:RE: f13C or faux13C

In prior thread, the premise was suggested that there are two different species (allotropes) of carbon which are being called carbon-13. One of the two species is the normal isotope with 7 neutrons, but the second is carbon-12 with a deeply embedded proton of UDH (the ultra-dense hydrogen) of