, 2008 5:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: HUP-spread-out electron feels (and thus
Coulomb-screens?) like a point charge... - T.GIF
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:33:07 +0200:
Hi,
Robin,
Although it seems to make sense, something doesn't fit in your center of mass
frame
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:28:56 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
But thermal energy is actual kinetic energy isn't it, so it doesn't resolve
the dilemma.
There is no dilemma to resolve.
Infinite times a short (but finite) period of time would be infinite... no,
this is
it, so you can't do proper physics in that
frame.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: HUP-spread-out electron feels (and thus
Coulomb-screens?) like a point charge
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:37:48 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
Forgive my obstinacy Robin, but admitting the proper frame should be the CMF,
shouldn't this be the CMF of all particles involved, i.e. including those of
the Pd anvil? After all, the target is not really D, but
in an accelerated frame, so COE isn't verified.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 1:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: HUP-spread-out electron feels (and thus
Coulomb-screens?) like a point charge... - T.GIF
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:57:05 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
But the moment right before dislodgement, when the deuteron pair experiences
considerable deceleration, is precisely when we would expect fusion isn't it?
So I still believe we must use the CMF of the whole
- Original Message -
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2008 11:51 PM
Indeed momentum p is the denominator of the De Broglie wavelength h/p, my
mistake. So in fact the more immobile the target deuteron, the less close the
incident
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:05:33 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
Indeed two immobile d's wouldn't attempt much I don't think, but isn't it ok
if _one_ d in the pair, namely the incident one, makes the attempt, as in the
Desorbing vs Incident Excess Surface Electron Catalyzed
, any enlightening welcome.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 12:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: HUP-spread-out electron feels (and thus
Coulomb-screens?) like a point charge... - T.GIF
In reply
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:33:07 +0200:
Hi,
Robin,
Although it seems to make sense, something doesn't fit in your center of mass
frame of reference and therefore equal De Broglie wavelengths (DBW) paradigm:
in that frame, as you say, when the particles are
PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2008 1:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: HUP-spread-out electron feels (and thus
Coulomb-screens?) like a point charge...
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:09:25 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
No it wouldn't be, but even with my
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:36:24 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
Hi Robin, many thanks for your corrections.
Indeed momentum p is the denominator of the De Broglie wavelength h/p, my
mistake. So in fact the more immobile the target deuteron, the less close the
incident
In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:51:39 +1000:
BTW, hs = h_stripe = h/(2*Pi)
epsilon = permittivity of the vacuum
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
The shrub is a plant.
In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:51:39 +1000:
Hi,
BTW2, ce = unit charge (i.e. absolute value of electron or proton charge).
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
The shrub is a plant.
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:09:25 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
No it wouldn't be, but even with my limited QM skills, I know that fortunately
you don't have to get that close for nuclear fusion. Nucleus is fm scale
(10^-15 m), but its De Broglie wavelength (roughly the
there at the same time... guess what can happen? ;-)
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:HUP-spread-out electron feels (and thus Coulomb-screens?)
like a point charge
@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:HUP-spread-out electron feels (and thus Coulomb-screens?)
like a point charge...
Even within classical physics the existence of a point charge is
problematic.
(as well as point masses.) Do you mean charge density at a point?
Harry
20, 2008 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:HUP-spread-out electron feels (and thus Coulomb-screens?)
like a point charge...
Even within classical physics the existence of a point charge is
problematic.
(as well as point masses.) Do you mean charge density at a point?
Harry
On 20/4/2008 6:49
18 matches
Mail list logo
