On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-07-12 22:21, Jones Beene wrote:
Akira - yes this conversation did happen; but it is/was NOT supposed to be
public. The subject line is also misleading.
Celani (via Passerini) should not have posted it.
On 2011-07-13 17:44, Michele Comitini wrote:
Interesting... the page has been removed from 22passi!
From other comments in that website it looks like there has been a
misunderstanding between Passerini and Celani regarding the permission
to publicly post that email, so the blogpost got
Interesting... the page has been removed from 22passi!
Mic
Il giorno 12/lug/2011 20:56, Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
ha scritto:
Hello group,
It looks like there have been interesting news on the (private) CMNS
mailing list as of late. Passerini in his latest post on his 22passi
Hello group,
It looks like there have been interesting news on the (private) CMNS
mailing list as of late. Passerini in his latest post on his 22passi
blog reported one email in particular (probably forwarded by Celani)
regarding tritium production from Rossi-like Ni-H LENR experiments. I
Akira - yes this conversation did happen; but it is/was NOT supposed to be
public. The subject line is also misleading.
Celani (via Passerini) should not have posted it. But, since 'LA-cat is out
of the bag,' why not make the best of it?
This is an extraordinarily important validation for the
On 2011-07-12 22:21, Jones Beene wrote:
Akira - yes this conversation did happen; but it is/was NOT supposed to be
public. The subject line is also misleading.
Celani (via Passerini) should not have posted it. But, since 'LA-cat is out
of the bag,' why not make the best of it?
[snip]
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Akira Shirakawa
By the way, I wonder if the Rossi-like experiment being tested at
LANL has something to do with the recently disclosed Brillouin device
which is supposed to be replicated there too...
... that is a very good bet
Perhaps this is the reason
Jones Beene wrote:
Claytor tried to go public with early convincing work nearly twenty years
ago, but because of the National Security Implications he was effectively
silenced; and dropped out of view for many years.
That's not true. He published several papers. Several are uploaded at
On 2011-07-12 23:18, Jones Beene wrote:
No - it is more about secrecy and proliferation - and the early history of
LENR. Not to mention, when someone asks you not to go public with a
conversation, it is considered good-form to honor their request. The
LENR-world may never hear from him again.
9 matches
Mail list logo
