Axil,
I have had same suspicion due to her arrival relative to
timeline.
Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 4:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Testing at University of Bologna - The Deadline
Looms
Mary,
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Roarty, Francis X
francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:
Axil,
I have had same suspicion due to her arrival relative to
timeline.
She's been skepticizing for several years now. I first saw her on the
Steorn forum. I told her how to join Vortex; so,
T,
Ok - fair enough explanation for her ETA, I don't really have issue with her
skepticism relative to Rossi - there is plenty of reason for that. I am
waiting instead on an impact from these recent reports of transmuted elements
and reports of inverted temp coefficients of Ni - Cu alloys. I
I have to say, take a look at:
http://www.moletrap.co.uk/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=483page=1#Item_0
The username maryyugo was banned from Steorn before December 2009.
Sorry, but she's been around the block a few times; Quite loudly.
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 09:18:28 -0500
Subject:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Robert Leguillon
robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have to say, take a look at:
http://www.moletrap.co.uk/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=483page=1#Item_0
The username maryyugo was banned from Steorn before December 2009.
Sorry, but she's been around the
I was just showing that, after a short Google search, it is quite evident that
the maryyugo persona is not, and I quote:
DOD shill assigned by the DOD to put the Vortex community off the scent,
discourage the development and promulgation of the real story of the E-Cat,
Rossi and Defkalion,
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Robert Leguillon
robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
My statement that, Sorry, but she's been around the block a few times..
was merely to state that maryyugo's presence is not evidence of a DOD
coverup, no matter how much some people may want there to be one.
BTW, MY should be awake and online soon. It will be interesting to
see what she has to say.
T
One of the more extravagant and incredible (on any basis) claims made by
Rossi on his blog is that he is tooling up to manufacture a million E-cats
during calendar year 2012. Comments on the moletrap forum noted that:
A million ECats. National Instruments stock must be going up, then. I'd
like
He didn't give a date for 1 million e-cats :) He just says he is working
towards that!
2012/1/6 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
One of the more extravagant and incredible (on any basis) claims made by
Rossi on his blog is that he is tooling up to manufacture a million E-cats
during calendar
Terry sez:
BTW, MY should be awake and online soon.
It will be interesting to see what she has to say.
My only contact with MY these days is through indirect exposure. There
has been a lot of that lately.
Robert's Google search was informative. It ought to put to rest
imaginative scenarios
On 2012-01-05 18:38, Robert Leguillon wrote:
It seems that Rossi may have reaped the benefits associated with
promises of independent university testing, but that delivery of this
may never occur.
Sterling D. Allan of PESN will conduct a live interview with him on
January 14th with user
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:16 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
If in subsequent years Rossi eCats actually DO start rolling off the
shelves of stores like Home Depot I suspect MY will soon start
searching around for another group (preferably linked to a
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2012-01-05 18:38, Robert Leguillon wrote:
It seems that Rossi may have reaped the benefits associated with
promises of independent university testing, but that delivery of this
may never occur.
Sterling D.
Rossi seems to have trouble even keeping track of what he writes on his own
blog.
Here, the device has an output of 5 kW net:
1. Andrea Rossi
January 6th, 2012 at 12:10
PMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563cpage=10#comment-165106
Mr ” Tom Jones”:
Since you used (a
Mary Yugo wrote:
I suggest they start by asking him why he and Focardi are freezing
their buns off in a room in which a running fusion reactor is present,
supposedly making 10 to 15 kW of thermal energy.
That reactor produced 5 to 8 kW, not 15 kW. It was in a large, drafty
room. 8 kW =
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Kerosene heaters are really dangerous, by the way. Picturesque but
dangerous.
Especially in houses with paper walls.
T
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo wrote:
I suggest they start by asking him why he and Focardi are freezing their
buns off in a room in which a running fusion reactor is present, supposedly
making 10 to 15 kW of thermal energy.
That
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo wrote:
It's not a barn, it's a small room.
Where is this photo? The photo I have is in a warehouse sized room.
I linked the photo. I think it's the same location that Krivit described
-- a small room
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Larger images of the room with Focardi and Rossi are here (LOL!):
http://www.moletrap.co.uk/wiki/index.php/Rossicaptions
This is sort of a trivial matter and can't be settled for sure without
cooperation from Rossi or Levi . . .
The heat from that
I wrote:
Running hot water through the dishwasher and down the drain in the kitchen
does not heat the kitchen much. It triggers the water heater to supply 12
kW for a while, so that much heat is going through the system.
Actually, it is probably more than 12 kW. A U.S.-style tank water
And it would become unbearably humid inside, so why hassle with it?
From: Mary Yugo [mailto:maryyu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 1:05 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Testing at University of Bologna - The Deadline Looms
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Jed
About the University of Bologna deadline, I posted to
journal-of-nuclear-physics last night, asking Rossi about the pending deadline.
The post was awaiting moderation; as it doesn't appear to have passed
moderation, I'll add it here for posterity:
Robert L.
Your comment is awaiting
Meanwhile, Defkalion promises independent testing. When? Oh... soon!
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=831
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Meanwhile, Defkalion promises independent testing. When? Oh... soon!
They do not promise it. They hope to have it.
They are a privately held business. They do not owe the public anything.
They do not need to make any promises or commitments to the public,
I'm much less apt to dismiss Defkalion out-of-hand. It's partly just an
objective evaluation of what limited information we have of the organization.
I'll happily grant them a bit of time before real skepticism sets in, mostly
based on Jed's claim that a competent observer has done a site
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Meanwhile, Defkalion promises independent testing. When? Oh... soon!
They do not promise it. They hope to have it.
They are a privately held business. They do not owe the
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
What concept is that, exactly? That someone can continue to make huge
claims, present no or insufficient evidence for an entire year and then
expect some sort of credibility or respect?
Some people respect them and give them credibility. Others do not.
Mary, you do not have the current Rossi inter-personal and political
dynamics down correctly or even worse maybe you do.
As I see things, Rossi never wanted to reveal the details of his work, but
Levi through an appeal to friendship forced Rossi to be more open to
revealing information. His need
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
As I see things, Rossi never wanted to reveal the details of his work, but
Levi through an appeal to friendship forced Rossi to be more open to
revealing information.
It was Focardi, not Levi. I think Rossi wanted to reveal some of his work,
to some
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
With Vortex as the premier LENR web information site, this is why I think
you are actually an air force major with the appropriate background assigned
here to hound this web site, to spread disinformation about the E-Cat, and
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
What concept is that, exactly? That someone can continue to make huge
claims, present no or insufficient evidence for an entire year and then
expect some sort of credibility or
32 matches
Mail list logo
