They say that there is nothing new under the sun. This applies to wet LENR.
Back in the 1960’s Joe Papp used the wet LENR formula to blast a crater
into the hardpan desert floor of the California desert.
Engineering is the art of turning disadvantage tp your fullest advantage.
Joe Papp did this by
Thanks, dear Axil for mentioning my persistent, intensive
and rather unsuccessful preaching for LENR+.
Even such simple ideas as in my most recent writing
wet CF systems CANNOT be made reproducible, CANNOT be ever scaled up and,
ergo exist only for science saying firmly CF is real and works someti
DGT embraces Dr. Kim’s optical theory as the prime reaction mechanism in
their reactor along with Bose-Einstein condensation.
In the broadest terms, this optical theory postulates that EMF will
catalyze nuclear reactions in elements, that is fusion reactions by
enhanced screening of the coulomb ba
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Foks0904 . wrote:
Unfortunately there remains very little evidence that hints at a
> correlation between transmutations and excess heat. The Miley work has not
> been replicated and remains ambiguous, albeit interesting. Results cited by
> Krivit in Naturwissensch
*I have read all the info on the Ni/H reactor that I can get my hands on,
and that all produce transmuted elements, they don't use deuterium, and
they don't produce tritium, the hallmark of deuterium fusion.*
*The Ni/H reactor does not fuse deuterium to produce heat. Without a doubt,
transmutation
Axil Axil wrote:
>
> The paper that was critiqued was written in 1998, the paper that I
> reference was produced in 2012.
>
> Maybe things have changed in that 14 year period; ya think?
>
This experiment has not changed much. The calorimetry has not changed at
all, as far as I know.
It still has
*"The critique is of a Ni bar experiment performed by Focardi, Habel, and
Piantelli."*
The paper that was critiqued was written in 1998, the paper that I
reference was produced in 2012.
Maybe things have changed in that 14 year period; ya think?
I have read all the info on the Ni/H reactor that
Axil Axil wrote:
> I don't see a any criticism of Piantelli's experimental procedure in the
> paper you provided.
>
The critique is of a Ni bar experiment performed by Focardi, Habel, and
Piantelli. The technique is the same. Others including McKubre have
critiqued the technique for similar reaso
I wrote:
> It says ". . . energy production as measured by means of the external cell
> surface." I guess that means they can measure sections of the external
> surface. It is surprising to me that the heat from the bar still forms a
> coherent pattern by the time it reaches the external surface.
I don't see a any criticism of Piantelli's experimental procedure in the
paper you provided. The referenced paper covers the work of Focardi et al.
And further, you have not provided a critical review of the particular
Piantelli paper I referenced.
So by default, the proof I provided stands true
Axil Axil wrote:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6id5Hf-xMWOYXVjekJCN1ZkQk0/edit?pli=1
>
>
>
> In this research paper by Piantelli, Slide 27 PROVES that transmutation of
> multiple elements from a nickel starting point is the cause of heat
> production in the Ni/H reaction.
>
That is impressiv
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6id5Hf-xMWOYXVjekJCN1ZkQk0/edit?pli=1
In this research paper by Piantelli, Slide 27 PROVES that transmutation of
multiple elements from a nickel starting point is the cause of heat
production in the Ni/H reaction. Please supply references that contradict
this exp
Foks0904 . wrote:
Jed I completely agree. Did you read the rest of my post?
>
I did. I was reiterating the points you made. Perhaps a bit redundantly. I
thought I would mention Takahashi's anticorrelated neutrons and Ed's
fractofusion hypothesis specifically.
- Jed
Jed I completely agree. Did you read the rest of my post?
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Foks0904 . wrote:
>
> I believe Axil is saying that researchers have not discounted the
>> existence of transmutations themselves, but rather have discounted the
>> correlation betw
Foks0904 . wrote:
I believe Axil is saying that researchers have not discounted the existence
> of transmutations themselves, but rather have discounted the correlation
> between excess heat and transmutations.
>
I do not think there is much correlation, except between the heat and
helium. Other
*independently replicated hey…*
Experiments by Piantelli have shown a connection between transmutation and
heat: 6 MeV is produced when a proton cooper pair is absorbed by a nickel
atom. A 6 MeV proton is detected as an energetic particle emanation from a
copper atom as seen in a cloud chamber a
I believe Axil is saying that researchers have not discounted the existence
of transmutations themselves, but rather have discounted the correlation
between excess heat and transmutations. It is similar to claims made
by Larsen and Krivit amongst others.
Unfortunately there remains very little evi
Let me reaffirm that Defkalion has every right to demand NDAs from their
visitors. There is nothing unethical or unusual about keeping a product
like this under wraps.
However, they cannot expect people to fully accept the claims as long as
they stick to this policy. They have a binary choice: sec
Axil Axil wrote:
In my opinion, the data revealed in the two Defkalion papers for ICCF-17
> and ICCF-18 contains a wealth of information or all those who take that
> information seriously.
>
I always take information seriously. But I have seen many, many
experimental errors. Mostly unpublished.
In my opinion, the data revealed in the two Defkalion papers for ICCF-17
and ICCF-18 contains a wealth of information or all those who take that
information seriously.
There is however a blind spot to such data formed when it speaks against
the long held and most cherished theories and predisposit
I know little about the situation at DGT, and I am not inclined to pry into
people's business. I do have two pieces of hard information which put
things in a bad light:
1. They never paid me the grand they owe me. They are either broke or
dishonest.
2. Some questions were raised about the flow ra
-Original Message-
From: Analog Fan
For anyone who has followed this [EEStor] fiasco over the years, it's an
incredible example of inventor self-deception and lack of due diligence,
coupled with lax Canadian markets which make it easy for predatory 'pump and
dump' schemes.
You got that
After many years, it looks like the EESTOR supercap fiasco is finally coming to
the bitter end. Zenn just announced their third set of independent test
results, and it is finally confirmed that the EESU doesn't work, as some have
suspected all along.
http://www.4-traders.com/ZENN-MOTOR-CO-INC-6
23 matches
Mail list logo
