In reply to thomas malloy's message of Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:55:18 -0500 (CDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
Actually, the frequencies that one might expect lie halfway between
the 27.2
multiples.
e.g.
13.6 eV
40.8 eV
68.0 eV etc.
Interesting post Robin. I'm reminded of the 3rd
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to thomas malloy's message of Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:43:40 -0500 (CDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Well,let me put it another way. if someone were attempting to get an LENR reactor to work. Let's suppose that it worked, measurable anomolus heat out put. Then they built a
whats the take on the ravi raju replication of the dave lawton replication
of stanley meyer's stuff?
is it really true that the popular consensus is that bob boyce's
electrolyzer is better at extracting HHO than stanley meyer's tube system
(i hear meyer also switched to plates just like bob boyce
just bumped into these, seems like hours and hours of interviews of people
like stephen meyer, jeane manning, dale pond, timothy thrapp, george wiseman
(isnt he one of the proponents of browns gas?)
Water Fuel Museum Vol.2 - http://www.blogtalkradio.com/waterfuel2007
Water Fuel Museum Vol.3 -
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
Actually, the frequencies that one might expect lie halfway between
the 27.2
multiples.
e.g.
13.6 eV
40.8 eV
68.0 eV etc.
Interesting post Robin. I'm reminded of the 3rd and 5th order harmonics
used by Keeley. Does anybody know if BLP is using multiple
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:In reply to thomas malloy's message of Wed, 23
Apr 2008 03:11:29 -0500 (CDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to thomas malloy's message of Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:43:40 -0500 (CDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Well,let me put it another way. if someone
--- In further reply to Robin van Spaandonk's reply
to Thomas Malloy's message:
Yes, there is a signature for hydrino activity, and
it is EUV radiation in particular spectra.
EUV is not expected in electrolysis or combustion, nor
is it evident visually like light photons (which would
tend to
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:26:58 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
In a high voltage plasma, EUV can be be expected
without hydrinos, but there are specific spectra which
are multiples of 27.2 eV which are the important clue,
according to Mills' CQM theory; and these energy
MAJ Todd Hathaway wrote:
This outlines some of the theory behind hydroxy gas production in the
Bob Boyce resonance drive systems we are building, similar to the
Stanley Meyer's system as described below:
AFAIK, the best Boyce Electrolyzers approach the theoretical efficiency
of
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to MAJ Todd Hathaway's message of Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:19:29 -0700
reinterpreting ordinary electrolysis. There must be some additional energy
source involved that is not normally accounted for, and determining exactly what
that energy source is, is the real
Here is a video of what is very likely (my opinion) to
be overunity hydrogen production from Ron Stiffler.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1pJEz0YGlQ
Dr Stiffler has made no claims of the sort, but the
numbers speak for themself in the context of the gas
being evolved- and are certainly a bit
In reply to thomas malloy's message of Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:30:39 -0500 (CDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to MAJ Todd Hathaway's message of Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:19:29 -0700
reinterpreting ordinary electrolysis. There must be some additional energy
source involved that is not
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to thomas malloy's message of Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:30:39 -0500 (CDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to MAJ Todd Hathaway's message of Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:19:29 -0700
reinterpreting ordinary electrolysis. There must be some
In reply to thomas malloy's message of Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:43:40 -0500 (CDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Well,let me put it another way. if someone were attempting to get an LENR
reactor to work. Let's suppose that it worked, measurable anomolus heat out
put. Then they built a hydrio generator and bubbled the
--- Robin wrote:
This is the key faulty assumption. It is not 1 V. It
is 1.48 V (and that is per hydrogen atom, not per
molecule). Hence the energy input is at least 2 x 1.48
x 96.5 kJ = 285 kJ, i.e. just what you get out of
burning it. Sorry, no free lunch.
Yes, although you can get a few
Apologies to Maj Hathaway who apparently started the
original posting to this thread, which for some reason
I did not receive, but read it just now in the
archives.
I suspect that he was actually present at the Jarboe
event in Maryland, and can fill us in on anything
which was demonstrated there,
This outlines some of the theory behind hydroxy gas production in the Bob Boyce
resonance drive systems we are building, similar to the Stanley Meyer's system
as described below:
The electrolysis process is not dependent on energy. From Arrhenius theory,
molecules in solution dissociate
17 matches
Mail list logo
