On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 3:41 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
You can get an idea of this from the HUP where delta E x delta t = h_bar/2.
If delta E is the energy of the reaction (about 4 MeV), then you get a
time of
at least 8E-23 sec.
(I think this is the way it is normally calculated.)
In
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
In reply to Axil Axil's message:
If the cause of LENR is the excitation of the vacuum through the
injection of very energetic EMF (magnetic), it might be possible that the
energy intensive magnetic fields supported by exothermic gainful
caught
between these grains acting as Casimir boundaries?
Fran
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 9:42 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:understanding the relationship between internal
conversion and the far
One further point relative to... it would surprise no one to learn that a
nickel version is also used (nominally NiOOH).
As mentioned before wrt Rydberg holes in nickel and iron, the combination of
the two (found in the Rossi reactor as well) is especially energetic for
ground state redundancy,
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Jul 6, 2014 9:36 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:understanding the relationship between internal conversion
and the far field
Eric--
I have several items that may pertain to your effort
the relationship between
internal conversion and the far field
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
In reply to Axil Axil's message:
If the cause of LENR is the excitation of the vacuum through the
injection of very energetic EMF (magnetic), it might be possible that the
energy
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 7 Jul 2014 06:41:53 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Not quite the same as LENR but close, since apparently with the military
version of nano-thermite, instead of finding the usual nanoparticles of
magnetite, we find that a ferrihydrite (nominally FeOOH) is used, which
-
From: mixent mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Jul 7, 2014 6:21 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:understanding the relationship between internal conversion
and the far field
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 7 Jul 2014 06:41:53 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Not quite the same
the relationship between internal
conversion and the far field
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 7 Jul 2014 06:41:53 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Not quite the same as LENR but close, since apparently with the military
version of nano-thermite, instead of finding the usual nanoparticles
I'm in the process of trying to better understand internal conversion and
it's cross section vis-a-vis inner shell electrons and sources of charge in
the far field. I'm hoping someone (Robin?) can help me to get the
terminology right and point me to further reading.
Here is my understanding so
Eric - By now you fully appreciate the impossibility of reconciling
mainstream fusion details with LENR. There is little way to rationalize all
of the contradictions, based on the data now available… but that does not
keep us from trying.
Let me add this, which would clear up some of the
Species which look like helium on a mass spec - especially when subject to
variable mass interactions immediately prior to measurement.
Helium - 4.002602 amu
D2 - 4.028203 amu
4 protons as Rydberg matter – 4.03176 amu
Next we must consider variable mass. To understand variable mass, this
Interesting proposal, Jones. I'll have to think about it. Thanks for the
pointer to the paper.
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
If Mizuno is correct we could add a fourth pathway for the dd reaction in
LENR. That would be p+p+p+p. It is not clear if this
One of the insights that we might possibly draw from the Mizuno experiment
is that there might be a mix of exothermic and endothermic nuclear
reactions going on simultaneously in LERN transmutation reactions.
If the cause of LENR is the excitation of the vacuum through the injection
of very
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sat, 5 Jul 2014 23:28:13 -0700:
Hi Eric,
[snip]
Here's where my understanding starts to get fuzzy. The above description
talked about isomeric transitions, which involve the decay of a metastable
isomer to the ground state of the isotope. Metastable isomers
Are there any textbooks you can recommend that touch on some of these areas
in some detail?
Eric
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 3:41 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sat, 5 Jul 2014 23:28:13 -0700:
Hi Eric,
[snip]
Here's where my understanding starts to get fuzzy.
Eric--
I have several items that may pertain to your effort to understand internal
conversion of nuclei.
Various isotopes have dipole and quadrapole moments existing in the stable
nucleus as well as the excited nucleus. Isomers and radioactive nuclei may
have these moments. The moments
Thank you, Bob. If you have any textbooks you particularly like (e.g.,
touching on nuclear spin states and nuclear transitions), feel free to
recommend them.
For anyone who is interested, I have found the following helpful in getting
a broad overview:
- Turner, Atoms, Radiation, and
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sun, 6 Jul 2014 15:56:14 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Are there any textbooks you can recommend that touch on some of these areas
in some detail?
Eric
Sorry, I don't know. Google is your friend (sometimes;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 6 Jul 2014 13:43:13 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
If the cause of LENR is the excitation of the vacuum through the injection of
very energetic EMF (magnetic), it might be possible that the energy intensive
magnetic fields supported by exothermic gainful nuclear
20 matches
Mail list logo
