At 02:04 AM 11/28/2004, Horace Heffner wrote:
At 11:11 PM 11/27/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
Hi,
This is my first post.
I was wondering if anyone in CF community has looked for evidence of a
correlation between the orientation of a CF cell and the amount of excess
heat produced.
Perhaps
At 1:19 AM 12/3/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
After reading some more, it seems to me a more accurate name for this field
is non-inertial-chemistry. Gravi-chemistry is misleading unless you are
endorsing the general theory of relativity which assumes that an
accelerating or non-inertial frame of
At 11:11 PM 11/27/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
Hi,
This is my first post.
I was wondering if anyone in CF community has looked for evidence of a
correlation between the orientation of a CF cell and the amount of excess
heat produced.
Perhaps the performance of a CF cell would change if the cell
At 11:11 PM 11/27/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
Hi,
This is my first post.
I was wondering if anyone in CF community has looked for evidence of a
correlation between the orientation of a CF cell and the amount of excess
heat produced.
Perhaps the performance of a CF cell would change if the cell
on 12/2/04 8:32 AM, Horace Heffner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:11 PM 11/27/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
Hi,
This is my first post.
I was wondering if anyone in CF community has looked for evidence of a
correlation between the orientation of a CF cell and the amount of excess
heat
on 12/2/04 12:40 PM, Horace Heffner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:58 AM 12/2/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
My hunch is that earth's gravity plays a essential role in the generation
excess heat in a CF cell. If I am correct, then rotating the same apparatus
will change the amount of excess heat
At 4:02 PM 12/2/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
I misunderstood the focus of your 'gravi-chem' research.
I thought your focus was D+D fusion.
Is it fair to say the primary focus of your research is the critique of the
conservation laws by physical means?
Actually, if you look at the vortex archives at
on 12/2/04 5:36 PM, Horace Heffner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 4:02 PM 12/2/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
I misunderstood the focus of your 'gravi-chem' research.
I thought your focus was D+D fusion.
Is it fair to say the primary focus of your research is the critique of the
conservation
on 11/28/04 2:04 AM, Horace Heffner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:11 PM 11/27/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
Hi,
This is my first post.
I was wondering if anyone in CF community has looked for evidence of a
correlation between the orientation of a CF cell and the amount of excess
heat
on 11/28/04 6:44 AM, Steven Krivit at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harry,
Welcome to Vortex.
Dennis Letts has performed some experimentation with magnets, at a certain
orientation, surrounding a cf cell.
Perhaps others have as well.
Steve
Thank you for the welcome.
My question concerns
At 2:21 PM 11/28/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
Thanks, but please don't get me wrong.
I am not insinuating that gravity is generating misleading calorimetric
measurements.
Yes, understood, but I am asserting that there in fact is good evidence
gravity does play a role if calorimeters are not properly
on 11/28/04 8:25 PM, Horace Heffner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 2:21 PM 11/28/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
Thanks, but please don't get me wrong.
I am not insinuating that gravity is generating misleading calorimetric
measurements.
Yes, understood, but I am asserting that there in fact is
Hi,
This is my first post.
I was wondering if anyone in CF community has looked for evidence of a
correlation between the orientation of a CF cell and the amount of excess
heat produced.
Perhaps the performance of a CF cell would change if the cell or some of its
parts were rotated 90 degrees
Excuse me! That is Mitchell Swartz who posts here sometimes and is publiher
of COLD FUSION TIMES and who has published on the existence of
*calorimetric anomalies* relating to gravity.
Regards,
Horace Heffner
14 matches
Mail list logo
