-Mark
From: Joshua Cude [mailto:joshua.c...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 2:28 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR Presentation by Joseph Zawodny, NASA Langley Research
Center Edit
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
wrote:
Nope, let
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <
zeropo...@charter.net> wrote:
> Nope, let me look into it... thx.
>
>
>
I meant google. Have you heard of google.
Don't bother looking in to the particular resonant collisions. It's just an
example of where collision energy can be tailo
Nope, let me look into it... thx.
-Mark
From: Joshua Cude [mailto:joshua.c...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 1:29 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR Presentation by Joseph Zawodny, NASA Langley Research
Center Edit
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Mark Iverson
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <
zeropo...@charter.net> wrote:
> ** **
>
> “Collisions can be resonant too…”
>
> ** **
>
> Please explain…
>
> **
>
Here's an abstract from PRL, which I found with 10 seconds of google. Have
you heard of it?
Resonant collisional ene
"Collisions can be resonant too."
Please explain.
-Mark
From: Joshua Cude [mailto:joshua.c...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 1:01 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR Presentation by Joseph Zawodny, NASA Langley Research
Center Edit
On Tue, D
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <
zeropo...@charter.net> wrote:
> The END RESULT is brute force smashing things together… there is NO
> resonance in that! That is, and always has been, my point. The actual
> interaction of the particles is by brute force, NOT RESONANCE.
>
mber 06, 2011 10:32 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR Presentation by Joseph Zawodny, NASA Langley Research
Center Edit
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
wrote:
JC:
Thx for the explanations, relevant or not, however, I still think that the
discussion wa
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <
zeropo...@charter.net> wrote:
> JC:
>
> Thx for the explanations, relevant or not, however, I still think that the
> discussion wandered from my initial point, which was, given proper
> conditions, one can disrupt the natural balance wi
ubject: Re: [Vo]:LENR Presentation by Joseph Zawodny, NASA Langley Research
Center Edit
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
wrote:
I would have thought with my clear statements about using extremely intense
magnetic fields and smashing particles head on at extremely high v
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <
zeropo...@charter.net> wrote:
>
> I would have thought with my clear statements about using extremely
> intense magnetic fields and smashing particles head on at extremely high
> velocities, it would have been obvious that I was referring to
ance to overcome electrostatic
repulsion?
-mark
From: Joshua Cude [mailto:joshua.c...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 12:40 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR Presentation by Joseph Zawodny, NASA Langley Research
Center Edit
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Mark Iv
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <
zeropo...@charter.net> wrote:
> I never said it was ‘exotic’…
>
> And I never attempted to explain something as simply claiming it was a
> resonant phenomenon…
>
> Stop putting words in my mouth.
>
> This whole discussion started with
In what way? Explain.
-Mark
From: Joshua Cude [mailto:joshua.c...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 11:56 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR Presentation by Joseph Zawodny, NASA Langley Research
Center Edit
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
w
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <
zeropo...@charter.net> wrote:
>
> The simple fact is, that given the SAME amount of ‘push’ at regular
> intervals, a resonant system will achieve what appears to be extreme
> amplitudes whereas the non-resonant push of the SAME amount of for
Cude replied with the following 'reasonable sounding' rebuttal, but it is
faulty at a fundamental level. It is not a valid comparison... I think he
was just accusing someone else of that same thing.
> I guess it depends what you mean by brute force physics. To me, when I
> push a child on a
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Joshua Cude wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I wholeheartedly disagree with your statement,
>>
>> “Resonance is very much a part of brute force physics.”
>>
>>
>>
>> I think I need to explain resonance to you…
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Robert Lynn wrote:
> It is clearly demonstrable that there exist mechanisms (of unknown type)
> in room temperature condensed matter to create at least 10's of keV, check
> out the rather fascinating following video:
>
>
I wouldn't say that's a mechanism *in* cond
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <
zeropo...@charter.net> wrote:
> ** **
>
> I wholeheartedly disagree with your statement,
>
> “Resonance is very much a part of brute force physics.”
>
> ** **
>
> I think I need to explain resonance to you…
>
> Resonance is an in
Thx for taking time to post that reference Axil.
I'm visually oriented, so some of the charts do look familiar.
-m
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 10:32 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR Presentation by Joseph Zawodny,
I wholeheartedly disagree with your statement,
"Resonance is very much a part of brute force physics."
I think I need to explain resonance to you.
Resonance is an interesting phenomenon where SMALL INputs of force or energy
into a system results in VERY LARGE OUTputs. There is nothing res
um energy density that
discounts the disassociation threshold of dihydrinos but allows hydrino motion
unopposed.
Fran
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 11:58 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:LENR Presentation by Jose
Am 05.12.2011 19:50, schrieb Robert Lynn:
It is clearly demonstrable that there exist mechanisms (of unknown type) in
room temperature condensed matter to create at least 10's of keV, check out
the rather fascinating following video:
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/10588/X_Rays_from_Sello
It is clearly demonstrable that there exist mechanisms (of unknown type) in
room temperature condensed matter to create at least 10's of keV, check out
the rather fascinating following video:
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/10588/X_Rays_from_Sellotape/
On 5 December 2011 15:52, Joshua Cude
>
> ** **
>
> -m
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, December 05, 2011 9:31 AM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:LENR Presentation by Joseph Zawodny, NASA Langley
> Research Center Edit
>
> ** **
>
xil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 9:31 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR Presentation by Joseph Zawodny, NASA Langley Research
Center Edit
Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint posted a study on Rydberg matter a few weeks ago
which stated that this special f
Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint posted a study on Rydberg matter a few weeks ago
which stated that this special form of exotic hydrogen (alkali matter) can
amplify quantum mechanical properties of atoms by some 11 orders of
magnitude; that is 10 to the 11th power. The Coulomb barrier cannot protect
the nucl
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <
zeropo...@charter.net> wrote:
> Joshua wrote:
>
> “So, random atomic motion representing a fraction of an eV per atom is
> somehow supposed to be concentrated by a factor of much more than a million
> by some resonant phenomenon.”
>
Joshua wrote:
"So, random atomic motion representing a fraction of an eV per atom is
somehow supposed to be concentrated by a factor of much more than a million
by some resonant phenomenon."
ABSOLUTELY POSSIBLE.
You are reasoning from the physics of brute force, which is all that nuclear
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <
zeropo...@charter.net> wrote:
> JC wrote:
>
> “Say what? That's just gibberish. I seriously doubt that Zawodny has any
> idea what that sentence means, if it means anything at all. A physical
> effect is allowed by a breakdown in a mathe
JC wrote:
"Say what? That's just gibberish. I seriously doubt that Zawodny has any
idea what that sentence means, if it means anything at all. A physical
effect is allowed by a breakdown in a mathematical approximation? What that
sentence does is make people's eyes glaze over, and think it sounds
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <
zeropo...@charter.net> wrote:
> The only set of slide notes in the presentation said the following about
> WLT:
>
> “The theory makes specific, testable predictions. Predictions that can be
> inexpensively verified.”
>
>
>
Well, one
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
>
> Interesting. Long on theory. Short on data.
>
Long on obfuscation.
A few things that struck me about that presentation:
Slide 13:
Zawodny is up front about the energy needed for electron capture by a
proton, which is more tha
The only set of slide notes in the presentation said the following about
WLT:
"The theory makes specific, testable predictions. Predictions that can be
inexpensively verified."
-mark
Interesting. Long on theory. Short on data.
On 2011-12-05 01:44, ecat builder wrote:
I just posted a slideshow from Dr. Joseph M. Zawodny of NASA Langley
Research Center from the September 22 LENR Workshop.
http://www.ecatplanet.net/content.php?133-LENR-Presentation-by-Joseph-Zawodny-2011
Its a 35 page PowerPoint presentation that covers
35 matches
Mail list logo
