James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The Ivy League, by handing out what amounts to life patents of nobility in
the guise of degrees, has taken the place of the old world aristocracy
with its claim on economic rent streams . . .
Really??? I had no idea. I completely missed out on that.
If it quacks like a life title, waddles like a life title and lays eggs
like a life title, it may as well be a life title.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The Ivy League, by handing out what amounts to life
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
If it quacks like a life title, waddles like a life title and lays eggs
like a life title, it may as well be a life title.
Yeah, okay, great. But where do I collect the payoff for this life title?!?
I mean, I love the old world aristocracy part. It is
To be fair, my basic argument about life patents of nobility applies to all
higher education degrees, not just Ivy League degrees. And to be fairer
the value employers place on degrees is starting to diminish. And to be
even fairer, people are starting to question the relative value of Ivy
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
To be fair, my basic argument about life patents of nobility applies to all
higher education degrees, not just Ivy League degrees.
To be realistic, I have never seen or experienced this. Ever. Not in 40
years.
Perhaps when I was just out of college, I
I do partly agree with you Jed. It is not the school or the education that
is privileged. The statements from those institutions are lifted up on a
pedestal because they already are accredited. I think people often select
this or that school or education because they want some of the glory and
With Robin van Spaandonk's assistance, I have been able to educate myself
on the Mills chronology. It is, insofar as chronology alone can be,
supportive of Mills's authenticity. However, if Mills is real, as this
chronology seems to indicate, it sheds new light on the sociology of
science in the
James
I think your evaluation is correct.
It does not matter which historical society you look into at some point in
time they become ruled with CYA. Do not think you are somebody.
Just now e built very large companies and government has responded by
growing in a way that they can be a comparable
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 1 Aug 2014 00:33:45 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:22 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
It's actually the other way around. Mills came up with the theory first,
then
started looking for ways to realize practical benefits from it.
Ah!
There are only 2 copies available for sale at Amazon, both used paperbacks
and the cheapest is $599.00
I doubt this is available by interlibrary loan but I've sent out a request.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 5:08 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 1 Aug 2014
In reply to James Bowery's message of Tue, 29 Jul 2014 22:10:04 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Perhaps I should restate the 2 miracles along a slightly different axis:
1) If one adopts Storms's viewpoint, there is no scientific revolution --
merely a different interpretation of accepted theory. So the
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:25 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to James Bowery's message of Tue, 29 Jul 2014 22:10:04 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Perhaps I should restate the 2 miracles along a slightly different axis:
1) If one adopts Storms's viewpoint, there is no scientific revolution --
In reply to James Bowery's message of Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:07:18 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
No of course a Newton, Maxwell, etc comes along once a century or so.
That's not what I'm talking about. Its more like someone accidentally
discovers steam power but can't really reproduce it because Newton's laws
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:22 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
It's actually the other way around. Mills came up with the theory first,
then
started looking for ways to realize practical benefits from it.
Ah! Then that is a start on an answer to my request for a chronology
stated in my prior
OK was I was able to adopt an unreasonably open posture toward Mills's
presentation and spend time searching for the calorimetry in the
demonstration videos. What I found was intriguing enough to bother to do a
little more investigation and invest a bit of my personal credibility with
a physicist
In reply to James Bowery's message of Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:22:19 -0500:
Hi James,
[snip]
OK was I was able to adopt an unreasonably open posture toward Mills's
presentation and spend time searching for the calorimetry in the
demonstration videos. What I found was intriguing enough to bother to do
out
and totally denounce Hydrino, who knows; or maybe he already has but I am not
processing it properly.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: James Bowery
To: vortex-l
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 3:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Personal observataions about the part two BLP July
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 4:53 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Why is this a miracle? Note that there are lots of Hydrino sizes, and
therefore different sizes are likely to predominate under different
circumstances. This could go a long way toward explaining the variability
in CF
experiments. In
I get it that there is plenty doubt about Mills' current claims due to his
prior track record. Personally, I find Mills often coming off as arrogant,
particularly in his terse responses to posts in the yahoo
[SocietyforClassicalPhysics] group. He is no friend of LENR research either,
that is
Can the recycling process function properly at 2000 cycles a second? Can a
rinse cycle clear the powder from the walls in 5 micro seconds? Will the
rinse cycle be a bottle neck in the overall firing rate?
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
Find a way to keep the powder suspended in the chamber magnetically like
Joe Papp did.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Can the recycling process function properly at 2000 cycles a second? Can a
rinse cycle clear the powder from the walls in 5 micro
More...
If there is 15 megawatts of waste heat to get rid up per cycle, water will
only exist as super heated steam. Washing the walls of the reaction chamber
with liquid water will not be possible.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Find a way to keep the
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 27 Jul 2014 22:28:42 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Can the recycling process function properly at 2000 cycles a second? Can a
rinse cycle clear the powder from the walls in 5 micro seconds? Will the
rinse cycle be a bottle neck in the overall firing rate?
Personally,
They should try for no cycling. I makes for a better system.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:38 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 27 Jul 2014 22:28:42 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Can the recycling process function properly at 2000 cycles a second? Can a
rinse cycle
MAYBE there is a MW, but for microsecons. From the videos on the PDF, it
seems that the electrodes get oxidized in seconds. I really doubt they can
keep the machine functioning longer than a few minutes.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
I don't get it.
Why do people think Mills is relevant when, if he has made any energy in vs
energy out measurements at all, they are so buried in other material that
any reasonable man would give up long before finding them?
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:38 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply
26 matches
Mail list logo
