Horace,
Not problematic at all! That is exactly what my theory predicts. The
energy deficits of deflation fusion prevent isomers form forming and thus
(large) gammas. The combination of strong force reactions with large energy
deficits followed by weak reactions when feasible makes for
Horace
Let's look at 58Ni specifically which is over 2/3 of all nickel
* The energy deficits for Ni are all huge. For example (energy deficits in
square brackets):
58Ni28 + p* -- 59Cu29 * + 3.419 MeV [-6.329 MeV] -- 59Ni28 + neutrino +
~2.6 MeV
Ok, as I interpret your theory,
On Apr 13, 2011, at 9:07 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
Not problematic at all! That is exactly what my theory predicts.
The energy deficits of deflation fusion prevent isomers form
forming and thus (large) gammas. The combination of strong force
reactions with large energy deficits
Thanks for the explication. I was not aware that an electron could be
trapped like that, but as you say - everyone looks at the shadows on the
cave wall from a different perspective.
-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner
How does a fast electron not produce gamma radiation?
Keep in
On Apr 14, 2011, at 6:35 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Horace
I wrote:
Let’s look at 58Ni specifically which is over 2/3 of all nickel
The energy deficits for Ni are all huge. For example (energy
deficits in square brackets):
58Ni28 + p* -- 59Cu29 * + 3.419 MeV [-6.329 MeV] --
On Apr 14, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Thanks for the explication.
You're welcome.
I was not aware that an electron could be
trapped like that, but as you say - everyone looks at the shadows
on the
cave wall from a different perspective.
Yes.
The trapping energy is
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 14 Apr 2011 06:26:38 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
How does a fast electron not produce gamma radiation? Is there an example of
beta decay that does not register on a sensitive meter? My unsophisticated
meters pick up beta decays from bananas! And I've noticed that
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:35:56 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Anyway, even if we can get past that one, the next problem resolves to the
59Ni and that large amount of 'real' energy 2.6 MeV. Even if most of the
energy were carried away by the neutrino, most of the time - in
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:35:56 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
This isotope is commonly used in medicine
IIRC, with a well-known Auger emission cascade on EC which Levi would have
immediately recognized. This is the most problematic of all, given Rossi's
lack of radioactivity in
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Aluminum foil will stop beta radiation (and look how thin it is).
Sure - and stopping the electron produces bremsstrahlung - easily detected,
and you seem to be underestimating the capability of detectors.
Fast electrons are not very
Robin,
Very little ??? No way !!!
You and Horace seem to making the same error with the 59Ni situation in
cherry picking data. LOTS of copper was seen in the Swedish test. An
incredible percentage, since Rossi says no copper is added.
We're talking grams of copper converted from nickel, if
Robin FYI,
If you look at http://atom.kaeri.re.kr/cgi-bin/decay?Ni-59%20EC you will
see
that the decay of Ni-59 involves electron capture
Correct - as I had already mentioned.
(with no visible signature because the energy is all carried by the
neutrino) 6.3 times out of 10. The
At 07:54 PM 4/14/2011, Jones Beene wrote:
The long half life means it should be VERY evident.
There should be massive radioactivity from any such reaction, and yet there
is none.
Whatever is allowing the nuclear reaction may also accelerate the
decay of unstable elements; LENR is fairly well
Using the decay equation:
N(t)=N0 * 2^(-t/t_0.5)
where N0 = number of atoms initially, N(t) = number of atoms
remaining after time t, and t_0.5 is the half life, we see that the
proportion of atoms remaining after time t, R(t) is given by:
R(t) = N(t)/N0 = 2^(-t/t_0.5)
and the
Jones,
I am convinced that the reversible chemistry is at the heart
of this phenomena, that the reversing force is ZPE and that once the
mechanism is refined there will not be a need for six month replacement
charges or regeneration. My model is of our 3D reality collapsed down
Jones,
I am convinced that the reversible chemistry is at the heart
of this phenomena, that the reversing force is ZPE in the form of gas law
and that once the mechanism is refined there will not be a need for six
month replacement charges or regeneration. My model is of our 3D
On Apr 13, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Once again: chemistry is fully conservative.
We must always preface these remarks with that. Valence electron
manipulation can provide no long term gain via reversible
chemistry… but … catch-22, a hybrid process can provide gain at the
Horace
* Jones, it's good to hear someone talk that way! Did you finally read my
paper?
I read your paper some time ago and may have commented on it when you were
off air but this is not easy stuff to grasp. The quark connection could
materialize in other ways too, but you deserve
On Apr 13, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Horace
The heavy element LENR explanation is problematic due to no gammas
as you are keenly aware. This could be rationalized if there were a
few gammas over background, but when you look at the scope shot of
Levi’s very sophisticated
19 matches
Mail list logo
