In a recent email, Ed Storms observed that the sample of the Lugano ash
that was tested was probably not at all representative of the material that
was active in the reactor core. At the temperatures measured, many of the
materials would have melted (or vaporized), and those that did not melt
The fact the the Ni62 particle was still functional and had its tubericles
intact points to the fact the particles was not melted and was no hotter
than the outside of the reactor. To explain this LENR miracle, see my
thread called: Super-fluidic heat flow.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Bob
Following on to this line of thought ... Given the temperatures that the
reactor had been operating in actual operation, many of the constituents of
the fuel powder would have either melted, vaporized, or sintered to the
inside of the reactor core vessel. Thus, when removing the ash for test,
the
Particle 1 was analyzed and found to contain Ni62. Its photo shows that its
tubercles were not melted and the particle was therefore cold. Your
reasoning must be reversed. Particle 1 came from the COLDEST part of the
reactor. The induction coil is also cold and must have been located close
to the
FYI, you can search all of Rossi's blogs using this handy link:
http://www.rossilivecat.com/all.html
Here is an entry from Aug. 28 2014 where Rossi states that his Rossi
effect seems to enrich nickel to Ni62, and that Ni62 seems to improve
the efficiency of the reaction. H
-Original Message-
From: Brad Lowe
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=853cpage=12#comment-992087
Quoting Rossi: We think that our process, the so called “Rossi Effect”, is, as
a serendipity, also a system to produce 62Ni, because only this fact can
explain the formation of
Robert,
Whether you know it or not, you may have put another nail in
coffin of any faint hope that this report is valid, and not a fraud. What's
more, in answer to Ransom, it could be a deliberate fraud.
Let me put it this way, if
_
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 4:16 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Isotope conversion completeness, was RE:
[Vo]:Pomp weighs
...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 4:16 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Isotope conversion
completeness, was RE: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in
Let me put
-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Isotope conversion
completeness, was RE: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in
Let me put it this way, if what you say is
true - that the sample tested to 99.3% purity of Ni-62, then we have
In reply to Robert Ellefson's message of Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:24:55 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
While this still only represents a small sample of the complete reactor ash,
I have a difficult time believing that a substantial fractionation of nickel
isotopes occurred. I suspect that most of the other fuel
]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 4:16 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Isotope conversion
completeness, was RE: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in
Let me put
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Why is the Ni62 nearly pure? The reaction was stopped for reasons which were
pre-planned, and not related to a depletion of reactants. They made this
clear.
There was an earlier thread about the possibility of burn-in,
: RE: Isotope conversion
completeness, was RE: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in
Let me put it this way, if what you say is
true - that the sample tested to 99.3% purity of Ni-62, then we have a
major
problem. Are you certain
Beene
[mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 4:16 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Isotope conversion
completeness, was RE: [Vo]:Pomp weighs
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
...and besides there is the little matter of all that excess energy.
All that excess?
In fact, here is nothing that can be called scientifically proved excess
energy at all... this is because the experiment is fatally flawed in using a
IR
I
f I read the information correctly reactor is only transparent to
I.R. below a wavelength of about 5 microns ( almost 0% transmissive
at wavelengths longer than 5 microns) and they used I.R. cameras that
were sensitive in the range of 7.5 microns and 13 microns. Therefor
the cameras
]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 4:35 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Isotope conversion completeness, was RE:
[Vo]:Pomp weighs in
Ok - I can buy the cyclic reaction, but how do you explain
the great preponderance of Li-6 in the ash
Harry and Jones,
I do not believe that the discovery of highly-enriched isotopes is the result
of fraud. I think that the variable fractions of isotopes between the surface
and the bulk of the ash indicates that isotopic enrichment was occurring
in-situ. The apparent fact (if true) that
Thanks!
Harry
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Robert Ellefson vortex-h...@e2ke.com
wrote:
Harry and Jones,
I do not believe that the discovery of highly-enriched isotopes is the
result of fraud. I think that the variable fractions of isotopes between
the surface and the bulk of the
Subject: RE: Isotope conversion
completeness, was RE: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in
Let me put it this way, if what you say is
true - that the sample tested to 99.3% purity of Ni-62, then we have a
major
problem. Are you certain
21 matches
Mail list logo
