I will answer you after Christmas.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: de Bivort Lawrence
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2012 2:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] Moon God, Dozens of wives, and marriageable age--for
the education of Jojo
Greetings
At 01:48 PM 12/24/2012, de Bivort Lawrence wrote:
A discussion of the issue of Ayesha and her age and condition at the
time of marriage, and some related descriptions. Thanks.
I had not discussed this issue for probably almost a decade. I've
been rummaging around and found three web sites
- Original Message - From: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2012 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] Moon God, Dozens of wives, and marriageable age
Funny thing happened on the way to truth...
Lomax first accuses me of lying because I refuse
: [Vo]:[OT] Moon God, Dozens of wives, and marriageable age
At 10:30 PM 12/23/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
Lomax accuses me of cherry picking what I read, but he does that
even better than I. Quite honestly, I have never met anyone with
such an innate skill at spinnng the truth. Excellent work Lomax
-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2012 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] Moon God, Dozens of wives, and marriageable age
At 10:30 PM 12/23/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
Lomax accuses me of cherry picking what I read, but he does that
even better than I. Quite honestly, I have never met anyone
Guys, I would very much prefer it if this thread were to be terminated. It is
apparent that there will never be agreement between the parties involved in the
dispute and highly unlikely that one or the other will modify his beliefs. Why
not just shake hands (electronically of course) and
Dave:
Couldn't agree more, that there will never be agreement. and that's ok, but
take the debate elsewhere, guys.
-Mark
From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2012 9:46 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] Moon God, Dozens of wives
; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 1:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] Moon God, Dozens of wives, and marriageable age
At 06:26 AM 12/22/2012, orgasm wikipedia wrote:
I STILL AGREE!
See bottom of this comment.
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=from:%22Jojo+Jaro
Frank,
Please refrain from saying things like this. I find it very insulting.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: fznidar...@aol.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] Moon God, Dozens of wives, and marriageable age
I
Greetings,
I'm curious. What is the source of this document?
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 23, 2012, at 5:04 AM, orgasm wikipedia wikipedia.org...@inbox.lv
wrote:
Jojo,
Not to worry. Free people appoint strong moral pillars such as yourself to
Secretary of State positions to
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 3:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] Moon God, Dozens of wives, and marriageable age
Essentially, all that Jojo has written about Islam is flat-out
incorrect. Lomax did a great job explaining and providing sources
for the reality.
I don't believe
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 9:26 AM, de Bivort Lawrence ldebiv...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
I'm curious. What is the source of this document?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defence_Regulation_18B
Many thanks, Terry.
My first reaction to the earlier posting of this text was, Fascism arises.
Interesting to see its provenance!
The British seem to have abolished the Regulation promptly. Odd that some
should be advocating its reintroduction.
On Dec 23, 2012, at 12:41 PM, Terry Blanton
have a right
to be deceived if you want.
Jojo
- Original Message - From: de Bivort Lawrence ldebiv...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 3:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] Moon God, Dozens of wives, and marriageable age
Essentially, all
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 2:45 PM, de Bivort Lawrence ldebiv...@gmail.com wrote:
Many thanks, Terry.
My first reaction to the earlier posting of this text was, Fascism arises.
Interesting to see its provenance!
The British seem to have abolished the Regulation promptly. Odd that some
At 12:51 AM 12/23/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
My friends, you will notice who it is that wanted to keep this topic alive.
The facts make it clear in case the Vortex system does not. Lomax started
this thread for which I responded with the truth. Orgasm Wikipedia
responded by agreeing and
At 07:04 AM 12/23/2012, orgasm wikipedia wrote:
Jojo,
Not to worry. Free people appoint strong moral pillars such as
yourself to Secretary of State positions to administer laws against
terrorism such as:
Ah. OW is trolling Jojo, too.
The document that is then quoted is an altered version
.
This is the last reply I will make regarding the matter. You
have a right to be deceived if you want.
Jojo
- Original Message - From: de Bivort Lawrence
ldebiv...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 3:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] Moon God, Dozens
At 04:17 PM 12/23/2012, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 2:45 PM, de Bivort Lawrence
ldebiv...@gmail.com wrote:
Many thanks, Terry.
My first reaction to the earlier posting of this text was,
Fascism arises. Interesting to see its provenance!
The British seem to have
?
- Original Message -
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2012 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] Moon God, Dozens of wives, and marriageable age
At 12:51 AM 12/23/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
My friends, you will notice
At 10:30 PM 12/23/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
Lomax accuses me of cherry picking what I read, but he does that
even better than I. Quite honestly, I have never met anyone with
such an innate skill at spinnng the truth. Excellent work Lomax.
The point is, Lomax conveniently ignores that the 2
At 06:26 AM 12/22/2012, orgasm wikipedia wrote:
I STILL AGREE!
See bottom of this comment.
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=from:%22Jojo+Jaro%22Jojo
Jaro
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:20121220Thu,
20 Dec 2012 21:52:43 -0800
Are all muslims preoccupied with obsessions? Someone told me they have animal
sex and it is advocated in the Koran. Could this be like a virus from (that
activity) and a medical condition causing undue speculation as a mental
syndrome. Does it make muslims to be insulted or mad to suggest
Essentially, all that Jojo has written about Islam is flat-out incorrect. Lomax
did a great job explaining and providing sources for the reality.
I don't believe that Joho is doing so maliciously: he is, I believe, merely
repeating misinformation that he has picked up elsewhere. Alas, given
On Dec 22, 2012, at 11:29, de Bivort Lawrence ldebiv...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone on this list is interested in Islam, I'll be happy to discuss
further, perhaps off-list.
Thank you for stepping in here. I like off topic posts like everyone else here,
but we should draw the line at
: [Vo]:[OT] Moon God, Dozens of wives, and marriageable age
Essentially, all that Jojo has written about Islam is flat-out incorrect.
Lomax did a great job explaining and providing sources for the reality.
I don't believe that Joho is doing so maliciously: he is, I believe, merely
repeating
At 12:58 PM 12/22/2012, Harvey Norris wrote:
Are all muslims preoccupied with obsessions?
Obsessed Muslims seem to be preoccupied with their obsessions,
perhaps unlike other humans who Can Stop Anytime I Want, I Just
Don't Want To.
However, to know about all Muslims, I'd need to know about
I went to Starbucks and asked for a Jojo Jaro and they recommended something.
-Original Message-
From: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Dec 22, 2012 10:15 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] Moon God, Dozens of wives, and marriageable age
Hey, I can't
As Jed always says, I AGREE!Wikipedia Jojo Jaro Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:52:43 -0800I am not going to respond to your spin anymore. The reader only needs to research this to confirm I am speaking the truth. It's funny how after knowing the history of wikipedia and its authorships, you still
At 12:51 AM 12/21/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
I am not going to respond to your spin anymore.
Once upon a time, I'd be hopeful reading this. But again and again,
my hopes were dashed. Jojo lies, it's that simple.
The reader only needs to research this to confirm I am speaking the truth.
Again
I am not going to respond to your spin anymore. The reader only needs to
research this to confirm I am speaking the truth.
It's funny how after knowing the history of wikipedia and its authorships,
you still cling to it as an authoritative source. Something must be wrong
when you have to
101 - 131 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
