, 2011 9:20 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Minor progress
I did try lead in various combinations with other materials. It does not have
very good characteristics. I am working to duplicate the output power wave
form, given the input power vs time, not just explain the energy balances.
I'll have more
: Re: [Vo]:Minor progress
The issue of complete vaporization has plagued the E-Cat from the beginning.
In
he early E-Cats, water was able to run straight out of the E-Cat and down a
rain, without ever being collected or sparged. In the 1MW demo, the steam is
ondensed and fed back
, Nov 7, 2011 10:08 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Minor progress
On Nov 7, 2011, at 3:15 PM, David Roberson wrote:
This exercise has me confused. Are you making an attempt to demonstrate that
it is possible to make a scam ECAT? That would of course be instructive since
Rossi has never run an ECAT
-
From: Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Nov 8, 2011 12:29 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Minor progress
Look at your own calculations:
c). If only liquid water is ejected by the ECATs, the minimum system power
utput is 187.667 grams/second * (440.27
On Nov 7, 2011, at 7:03 PM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Horace, indeed 2 megaeuros would be good investment to check the
validity of Rossi's claim. If it works, then we are hundreds of
modules to play around. And if it does not work in means of cold
fusion processes then just return the device
: Mon, Nov 7, 2011 8:47 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Minor progress
On Nov 7, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Berke Durak wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Colin Hercus
colinher...@gmail.com wrote:
Or 25kg per module if we just bring the water to 105C and make
very little
steam
But that assumes
101 - 106 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
