From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 12:47:05 PM
The conclusion that logic forces us to arrive at must be that there is
another place where all that over unity heat is coming from. These particles
cannot be producing (900 watts) (3.5) = 3150 watts of
Perhaps these are the sources. If you look at the literature (I don't
remember where, but I think it's a paper o presentation from Kim), it's
pointed out that 24MeV particles from within old experiments with Pd look
like conic craters with 4um in diameter and similar depth, if my memory is
We may eventually come to the conclusion that the nickel can produce power even
in the molten form. That seems to be what is implied. Is there reason to
assume that molten nickel can not work? A higher temperature might enhance the
process that is not well understood at the moment.
I have
In reply to David Roberson's message of Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:16:29 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
We may eventually come to the conclusion that the nickel can produce power
even in the molten form. That seems to be what is implied. Is there reason
to assume that molten nickel can not work? A higher
I believe that Ni particles will not work once melted - just intuition,
because I don't buy the neutron stripping yet. If we take a leap of faith
and say that the central reactor core alumina tube is coated with particles
sintered to its inside (like a catalytic converter for example), we don't
5 matches
Mail list logo
