At 11:55 PM 7/21/2007 -0400, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dr. Mitchell Swartz wrote:
1) For example, even tonight, I observed that the papers of Dr. Ken
Shoulders
still are censored.
Rothwell:
Shoulders has never submitted a paper to me. As far as I know he has
never written one
Imagine that there is a plasma, and it is cooled and compressed
repeatedly. Eventually, we will not be able to compress the plasma any
further, because the Exclusion Principle states that two particles cannot be
in the exact same place at the exact same time. When in this state, since
there is
How are you powering the demon door?
PM fields.
-Original Message-
From: thomas malloy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 10:41 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Maxwell's Demon, naw!
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
Maxwell's Demon, How to know he is
Since Swartz has once again brought up his obsession about censorship at
LENR, this gives me an opportunity to clarify the criteria used to put
papers on the LENR website. For the sake of this discussion, the website
has two parts: a listing of over 3000 papers having some relevance to
cold
On Jul 22, 2007, at 4:08 AM, Nick Palmer wrote:
Imagine that there is a plasma, and it is cooled and compressed
repeatedly. Eventually, we will not be able to compress the plasma
any further, because the Exclusion Principle states that two
particles cannot be in the exact same place at
At 08:04 AM 7/22/2007 -0600, Edmund Storms wrote:
Storms: Since Swartz has once again brought up his obsession about
censorship at LENR ...
Projection and ad hominem.
The ONLY obsession with censorship has been, and remains,
from Ed Storms, himself.
Rothwell even admitted that Storms has
One more important detail to add:
We want to push the oscillation of the barbell to resonance at the same
time as increase the amplitude of asymmetrical jerk (cross vector). Both
of these two isotopes H and D - have a strong magnetic moment, but a
significantly different moment, and also a
Bonjour George,
Regular as clockwork, here I am with my biennial
posting:
It makes one hesitate to engage in a long conversation ;-)
Why should the solar collector field not obey the same
rules as say IT or Mobile phones?
You're right, cost is bound to go down.
Present cost and savings
Ed and Jed, one can't help noticing that the reasons invoked for not uploading
Mitchell's papers to the LENR libraries keep shifting. Initially the reason was
a file format problem. A solution was suggested, which if it is good enough for
Google Books and Amazon should be good enough for LENR.
Michel
Jones, how does it fare compared to the actual quotes you got for your place?
An installed cost of $ 51,000 is about right for that output minimuim
they call it - for those with an existing south facing roof - but the
generous State tax credits of a few years ago are no longer in
Michel Jullian wrote:
Ed and Jed, one can't help noticing that the reasons invoked for not uploading
Mitchell's papers to the LENR libraries keep shifting.
That is incorrect; you misunderstand the situation.
Initially the reason was a file format problem. A solution was suggested,
which if
Edmund Storms wrote:
Occasionally, with
the author's permission, Jed has attempted to make a paper more
understandable.
Actually, I have done that fairly often for authors who speak English as a
second language -- with their permission and cooperation, of course! I have
worked with authors
Dr. Mitchell Swartz wrote:
Titles of papers were censored in a site which purported to represents the
community,
and which claimed to represent ICCF-10.
We emphatically DO NOT represent ICCF-10!!! The web page says:
This section includes the informal, on-line edition of the conference
On Jul 22, 2007, at 6:59 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
Bonjour George,
Regular as clockwork, here I am with my biennial
posting:
It makes one hesitate to engage in a long conversation ;-)
Why should the solar collector field not obey the same
rules as say IT or Mobile phones?
You're
Become an Environmental Activist today !!
Tree-hugger or not - if you really want to help out Gaia - the
environment, and all that - forget solar panels for the home - here is a
much brighter solution that saves tons of money and reduces tons of CO2.
You can accomplish more with a single $20
On 7/22/07, Nick Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I quoted the above from the Wiki article on degenerate matter.
Hopefully, it's not as dangerous as protomatter:
http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Protomatter
Terry
Reading everything that has been said, and a lot of things that
haven't between the lines, I have come to personal conclusion (a
conclusion which nevertheless could be inaccurate) that Dr. Swartz
doesn't get along with either Mr. Rothwell and/or Dr. Storms. Or
perhaps it's the other way around.
I sure hope incandescent bulbs will still be available. They have special
uses such as heaters, ballast resistors, often making use of their non
linear resistance characteristics, infrared sources, low EMI lighting, and a
few other things I've used them for that I can't remember now.
- Original Message -
From: thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sunday, July 22, 2007 1:36 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: centripetal force question
Harry Veeder wrote: Interesting thread. The reason I started it was because I'd like to know, suppose the earth started spinning faster,
Good for Oz. WE should do this arm-twisting in the USA! (bulb-twisting?)
From the article: In the United States, an ingenious website called
18seconds.org (the name derives from the time it takes to change a light
bulb)...
[presumably this is by non-EEs who may, for professional courtesy,
On Jul 22, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
BTW - I notice on the box, in the smallest of small print which
these old eyes can read -- that the U Light America bulbs are ...
yup ... Made in China. Wonder if there is some hidden toxic
surprise...
It may be in the temperature of
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: centripetal force question
...
Interesting thread. The reason I started it was because I'd like
to
know, suppose the earth started spinning
Jones Beene wrote:
But falling prices for solar panels may indeed make good financial sense
for companies or businesses with large flat roofs, where depreciation
and maintenance make those costs deductible . . .
That is the key point in all of this. Even though solar is too expensive for
On Jul 22, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
Ban the bulb!
Terry
Hopefully you mean ban the incandescent!
I wonder how GE and Wal-Mart are getting along these days. GE was
trying to buy time to fight off erosion of its incandescent light
bulb business to compacts, and to develop
I concur with Judge Steven V. Johnson's conclusions.
Jed wrote:
There are none in dispute. We will accept any or all.
You are hereby sentenced to add in the form of his choice, because readers
don't give a damn about the format in which they can access a previously
unavailable resource, and
On Jul 21, 2007, at 7:28 PM, R.C.Macaulay wrote:
Interesting arrangement and diameter of tubes he has used . He must
have spent some time in trial and error in sizing the diameter of
the tubes to achieve the effect by using a rotary pulse voltage
frequency generator..
On Jul 22, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Michel Jullian wrote:
Now the reason invoked is one of contents. This brings support to
Mitchell's
allegations of censorship I am afraid. Why don't you just upload
those
papers so that people can make their own opinion?
Actually, as I
Judge Johnson sez:
Under the circumstances it seems to me that if
Dr. Schwartz would be so kind as to upload the disputed
papers to his own web site (as-is?) that this would go
a long way in resolving the controversy.
To which Jed replies:
That, he will never do.
...
In another recent
I wrote:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - -
Yes, the total super-positioned E field nets to about zero, but the
way that happens is by a change in charge distribution. That change
in charge distribution has effects. The electron fugacity in
29 matches
Mail list logo
